تاثیر ساختار تجارت اجتماعی بر قصد خرید با میانجی اعتماد و جستجوی اطلاعات | ||
| کاوش‌های مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 13، شماره 25، شهریور 1400، صفحه 371-394 اصل مقاله (564.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/bar.2021.12978.3305 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد فاریابی* 1؛ سعیده عزیزخواه آلانق2 | ||
| 1دانشیار مدیریت استراتژیک، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی ـ تجارت الکترونیک، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از مهمترین کاربردهای فناوری و اینترنت در حوزه اقتصادی، تجارت اجتماعی است، که زیر مجموعه ای از تجارت الکترونیک میباشد. با این وجود این سوال وجود دارد که ساختار تجارت اجتماعی چگونه بر قصد خرید مصرف کننده تاثیر میگذارد؟ در این راستا پژوهش حاضر تاثیر ساختار تجارت اجتماعی بر قصد خرید مصرفکنندگان را بررسی میکند. این پژوهش از نوع پژوهشهای کاربردی بوده و از نظر شیوه انجام پژوهش جزء پژوهش های توصیفی ـ پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش دانشجویان دانشگاه تبریز بوده و حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 376 نفر به دست آمد. دادههای جمعآوری شده توسط پرسشنامه با استفاده از روش مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزارهای SPSS و PLS تجزیه و تحلیل شده است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان میدهند که ساختارهای تجارت اجتماعی که شامل پیشنهادات و ارجاعها، رتبهبندی و بررسیها، فرمها و انجمنها میباشد به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 391/0، 325/0 و 201/0 بر اعتماد تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارند و همچنین اعتماد بر قصد خرید با ضریب مسیر 402/0، اعتماد بر جستجوی اطلاعات با ضریب مسیر 602/0 و جستجوی اطلاعات بر قصد خرید با ضریب مسیر 219/0 تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. به طوریکه اعتماد در رابطه بین ساختار تجارت اجتماعی و قصد خرید به عنوان متغیر میانجی و جستجوی اطلاعات در رابطه بین اعتماد و قصد خرید به عنوان متغیر میانجی تاثیرگذار هستند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اعتماد؛ تجارت اجتماعی؛ قصد خرید؛ ساختار تجارت اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The impact of Social Commerce Construction on Purchase Intention with the mediating role of Trust and Information Seeking | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Faryabi1؛ Saeideh Azizkhah Alanagh2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Strategic Management, Faculty of economics and management, University of Tabriz | ||
| 2M.A, Business Management - E-commerce, University of Tabriz | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: One of the most important uses of technology and the Internet in the economic field is social commerce, which is a subset of e-commerce. Recent advances in information and communication technologies and the advent of Web 2 have brought new developments in e-commerce. The popularity of social technologies and operating systems such as social networking sites (SNS) is one of the main reasons for progress in this area. These developments lead people to policy making and interaction with their friends in social contexts, especially in online communities. Social communications and interactions on the Internet, especially on social networking sites, which are the main focus of SNS, have opened up e-commerce to economic development. As the connection between business and technology has existed and continued for a long time, today one of the most popular methods of business is online shopping in the web world. Social commerce is an application from the Web 2 like a content creation tool to increase user interaction in e-commerce. Social commerce is a subset of e-commerce that includes the use of social media to assist in e-commerce activities and transactions. The difference between social commerce and e-commerce is that social commerce involves forums and conversations between members, while e-commerce focuses on people and one-on-one interactions to create value. The technology of Web 2, as the foundation of social media and social networking sites, facilitates the acquisition of products through user engagement and interaction. Nowadays, the use of social commerce has increased so that social commerce companies have significantly increased their financial investment risks. In the meantime, trust is one of the main reasons for customers to lead to e-shopping. However, according to the concept of social commerce, when users know about a product, they may participate in the purchase. So, trusting social networking sites can increase users' purchases from e-sellers. Buying from an e-seller depends on the customer's trust in the e-seller. So, trust in social networking sites can increase the intention to buy. Social networking sites as social commerce platforms connect customers with e-sellers and facilitate exchanges. Trust is a key concept in interactions and is important for companies in developing relationships with vendors Methodology: In this regard, this research examines the impact of construction of social commerce on consumer purchase intention. This research is practical in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population of this study consists of Tabriz University students who are considered as a set of the Instagram users or fans of popular non-Iranian social networks in Iran. The sample size is 376 according to the Cochran formula. In addition to being popular, the Instagram social network is chosen because it is a website-based social network. Due to the large number of users in the statistical population, random sampling method has been used. The data collected by the questionnaire were analyzed using the structural equation modeling method and the SPSS and PLS software programs. Results and Discussion: In this study, to check the reliability and validity of the constructs, four sets of necessary tests are carried out including internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. These validities are evaluated by analyzing Cronbach's alpha (α), factor loadings, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE). The minimum level of factor loading is 0.7, and the results show that they are above 0.7. The minimum value for α is 0.7, which shows that the data have an internal consistency. The model has good and reasonable convergent validity because the value of CR for all the constructs is above 0.8, while the value of AVE for all the constructs is above 0.5. Thus, the findings show a reasonable convergent validity. The discriminant validity confirms whether the construct measures are different from other constructs or not. Also, the result shows reasonable discriminant validity because the square root of the AVE is higher than the correlation between variables. The discriminant validity shows whether the construct measures are different from other constructs or not. Also, the findings show the square root of the AVE, which is higher than the correlation between variables, which shows the reasonable discriminant validity. The value of R2 above 0.2 is considered relatively high and acceptable. In this study, the value of R2 for trust is o.53, for information seeking is 0.36, and for purchase intention is 0.31. Furthermore, we use the blindfolding method to assess the relevance of exogenous variables and the model performance, which is a sample reuse method. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the role of social commerce and trust in the consumer's intention to buy from e-vendors. We used Instagram as the best-known platform for e-commerce to empirically test our model. Various findings can be obtained from this study. First of all, recommendations and referrals, ratings and reviews, and forums and communities are found to have a positive effect on consumers' trust in online purchasing. The results are consistent with the studies of Hajli (2015), Kim & Park (2013), and Weisberg et al. (2011). As these structures also affect purchase intention through trust, the effect of trust on purchase intention is also confirmed by information seeking mediation. This finding is consistent with prior studies and supported by Hajli (2015), Hajli et al. (2017), Li (2019), Henien (2011), and Featherman & Hajli (2015). Conclusion: This study tested the research model by collecting data from 376 customers. The results showed that recommendations and referrals affect trust. The findings suggested that ratings and reviews and forums and communities have a significantly positive influence on trust, which further influences purchase intention. Also, as reported, trust positively and significantly affects information seeking. Furthermore, information seeking affects purchase intention. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Trust, Social commerce, Purchase intention, Social commerce construction | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ben Yahia, I., Al-Neama, N., & Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 11-19. Braojos, J., Benitez, J., LIorens, J. (2019). How do social commerce-IT capabilities influence firm performance? Theory and empirical evidence, Information & Management, 56(2), 155-171. Chang, X., Li, J. (2019). Business performance prediction in location-based social commerce, Expert Systems with Applications, 126, 112-123. Chen, J., Xu, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). Moderated online communities and qualityof user-generated content. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2),237–268. Chen, J., Xu, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). Moderated online communities and qualityof user-generated content. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2),237–268. Chiou, J. -S., Droge, C., & Hanvanich, S. (2002). Does customer knowledge affect how loyalty is formed? Journal of Service Research, 5(2), 113–124. Chris, F., Anindya, G., & Batia, W. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviewsand sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313. Danaei, A., Momen, E. (2017). Investigating the effect of viral marketing on social networks on consumers' purchase intention (Case study: Telegram social network users). Journal of Business Administration Research, 9(18), 243-267. Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software, Second Edition, Jihad Daneshgahi Publications. Doha, A., Elnahla, N., McShane, L. (2019). Social commerce as social networking, Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 47, 307-321. Do-Hyung, P., Jumin, L., & Ingoo, H. (2007). The effect of on-line con-sumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role ofinvolvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. Featherman, M. S., & Hajli, N. (2016). Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), 251–269. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 888-902. Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2009). Consumer empowermentthrough Internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 71–102. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003b). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003a). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307–321. Ghafourian Shagerdi, A., Daneshmand, B., Behboudi, O. (2017). The Impact of Social Media Marketing on Brand Loyalty and Consumer Purchasing Intent. Journal of New Marketing Research, 7(3), 175-190. Gunawan, D. D., & Huarng, K.-H. (2015). Viral effects of social network and media on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2237-2241. Hajli, M. N. (2014). A study of the impact of social media on consumers. International Journal of Market Research, 56(3), 387-404. Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy, International Journal of Information Management, 35, 183-191. Hajli, N., Sims, J., H.zadeh, A., & Richard, M.-O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71(7), 133-141. Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(9), 393-408. Heinonen, K. (2011). Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers' social media behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(6), 356–364. Hu, T., Dai, H., Salam., A.F. (2019). Integrative qualities and dimensions of social commerce: Toward a unified view, Information & Management, 56(2), 249-270. Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 246–259. Kaiser, S., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2008). Leveraging lead user knowledge in software development: The case of weblog technology. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 199-221. Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318-332. Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information service. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited Incorporated, 361. Kushik, K., Mishra, R., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Exploring reviews and review sequences on e-commerce platform: A study of helpful reviews on Amazon.in, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 21-32. Li, C. Y. (2019). How social commerce constructs influence customers’ social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(129), 282–294. Liang, T. -P., & Turban, E. (2011). Introduction to the special issue, social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 5–14. Lu, B., Fan, W., & Zhou, M. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225-237 Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 9(4), 346–360. McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trustmeans in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35–59. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. Montazeri, M., Ebrahimi, A., Ahmadi, P., Rahnema, A. (2014). Investigating the factors affecting the intention to buy in e-commerce. Journal of Business Management, 6(2), 207-416. Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307–318. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-Loyalty : Your Secret Weapon on the Web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommen-dation on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169. Shafie Nikabadi, M., Zarei, A. (2017). The effectiveness of social networking advertising. Journal of Business Administration Research, 9(17), 149-173. Shin, D.-H. (2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approch to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with computers, 22, 428-438. Shirkhodai, M., Shahi, M., Nejat, S., Mahmoudinasab, S. (2017). Investigating the effect of social media on the formation of trust and loyalty to the brand in the brand community (Case study: Instagram social network). Journal of New Marketing Research, 7(3), 107-124. Stephen, A. T., & Toubia, O. (2010). Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 215–228. Tajvidi, M., Richard, M.-O., Wang, Y., Hajli, N. (2018). Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media, Journal of Business Research. Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 20(5), 520-535. Wang, X., Lin, X., Spencer, M. K. (2019). Exploring the effects of extrinsic motivation on consumer behaviors in social commerce: Revealing consumers’ perceptions of social commerce benefits, International Journal of Information Management, 45, 163-175. Wang, Y., Min, Q., & Han, S. (2016). Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behavior toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 56(7), 34-44. Weisberg, J., Te’eni, D., & Arman, L. (2011). Past purchase and intention to purchasein e-commerce: The mediation of social presence and trust. Internet Research, 21(1), 82–96. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 708 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 490 |
||