A Critique on Power Spectrum – Area Fractal Method for Geochemical Anomaly Mapping | ||
| روش های تحلیلی و عددی در مهندسی معدن | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 25، دی 1399، صفحه 33-41 اصل مقاله (955.45 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/anm.2020.9372.1326 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| حسین مهدیان فر* | ||
| دانشکده مهندسی معدن، دانشگاه گناباد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Power spectrum – area fractal (S-A fractal) method has been frequently applied for geochemical anomaly mapping. Some researchers have performed this method for separation of geochemical anomaly, background and noise and have delineated their distribution maps. In this research, surface geochemical data of Zafarghand Cu-Mo mineralization area have been utilized and some defects of S-A fractal method have been discussed. The surface geochemical data were transformed to the frequency domain using Fourier transformation and the S-A fractal method was performed on obtained Cu power spectrum. 4 geochemical classes were distinguished on the basis of fractal diagram then these classes were separated using various filters and their signals were analyzed separately by principal component analysis (PCA) and the situation of mineralization was interpreted. PCA shows the low frequency geochemical signals have strongly been affected by the Cu and Mo mineralization process. In the end, the Cu geochemical anomaly map based on this low frequency class was delineated using inverse Fourier transformation. The deep borehole that was drilled in the center of this obtained anomaly shows there is a mineralization zone at the depth. The disadvantages of S-A fractal method have been discussed using these obtained results. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Two-dimensional Fourier transform؛ frequency domain of geochemical data؛ Principal Component Analysis (PCA)؛ Power spectrum – area Fractal method | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Critique on Power Spectrum – Area Fractal Method for Geochemical Anomaly Mapping | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| hossein Mahdiyanfar | ||
| Dept. of Mining, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Power spectrum – area fractal (S-A fractal) method has been frequently applied for geochemical anomaly mapping. Some researchers have performed this method for separation of geochemical anomaly, background and noise and have delineated their distribution maps. In this research, surface geochemical data of Zafarghand Cu-Mo mineralization area have been utilized and some defects of S-A fractal method have been discussed. The surface geochemical data were transformed to the frequency domain using Fourier transformation and the S-A fractal method was performed on obtained Cu power spectrum. 4 geochemical classes were distinguished on the basis of fractal diagram then these classes were separated using various filters and their signals were analyzed separately by principal component analysis (PCA) and the situation of mineralization was interpreted. PCA shows the low frequency geochemical signals have strongly been affected by the Cu and Mo mineralization process. In the end, the Cu geochemical anomaly map based on this low frequency class was delineated using inverse Fourier transformation. The deep borehole that was drilled in the center of this obtained anomaly shows there is a mineralization zone at the depth. The disadvantages of S-A fractal method have been discussed using these obtained results. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Two-dimensional Fourier transform, frequency domain of geochemical data, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Power spectrum – area Fractal method | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Zuo, R., & Wang, J. (2016). Fractal/multifractal modeling of geochemical data: A review. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 164, 33-41.
[2] Zuo, R., Wang, J., Chen, G., & Yang, M. (2015). Identification of weak anomalies: A multifractal perspective. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 148, 12-24.
[3] Meigoony, M. S., Afzal, P., Gholinejad, M., Yasrebi, A. B., & Sadeghi, B. (2014). Delineation of geochemical anomalies using factor analysis and multifractal modeling based on stream sediments data in Sarajeh 1: 100,000 sheet, Central Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(12), 5333-5343.
[4] Sadeghi, B., Moarefvand, P., Afzal, P., Yasrebi, A. B., Saein, L. D. (2012). Application of fractal models to outline mineralized zones in the Zaghia iron ore deposit, Central Iran. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 122, 9-19.
[5] Hassani, H., Daya, A., & Alinia, F. (2009). Application of a fractal method relating power spectrum and area for separation of geochemical anomalies from background, Aust J Basic Appl Sci, 3(4), 3307-3320.
[6] Shahi, H., )2017(. Prediction of dispersed mineralization zone in depth using frequency domain of surface geochemical data, Journal of Mining and Environment, 8(3), pp.433-446.
[7] Shahi, H., Ghavami, R., Kamkar Rouhani, A. and Asadi Haroni, H., )2014(. Identification of mineralization features and deep geochemical anomalies using a new FT-PCA approach. Geopersia, 4(2), pp.227-236.
[8] Shahi, H., Ghavami Riabi, R., Kamkar Ruhani, A. and Asadi Haroni, H., )2015(. Prediction of mineral deposit model and identification of mineralization trend in depth using frequency domain of surface geochemical data in Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit. Journal of Mining and Environment, 6(2), pp.225-236.
[9] Shahi, H., Ghavami, R., Rouhani, A.K., Kahoo, A.R. and Haroni, H.A., )2015(. Application of Fourier and wavelet approaches for identification of geochemical anomalies. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 106, pp.118-128.
[10] Shahi, H., Ghavami, R. and Rouhani, A.K. )2016(. Detection of deep and blind mineral deposits using new proposed frequency coefficients method in frequency domain of geochemical data, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 162, pp.29-39.
[11] Zuo, R. (2011). Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with Cu and Pb–Zn skarn mineralization using principal component analysis and spectrum–area fractal modeling in the Gangdese Belt, Tibet (China). Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 111(1-2), 13-22.
[12] Cheng, Q., & Zhao, P. (2011). Singularity theories and methods for characterizing mineralization processes and mapping geo-anomalies for mineral deposit prediction, Geoscience Frontiers, 2(1), 67-79.
[13] Cheng, Q., Xu, Y., & Grunsky, E. (2000). Integrated spatial and spectrum method for geochemical anomaly separation. Natural Resources Research, 9(1), 43-52.
[14] Zuo, R., Carranza, E. J. M., & Cheng, Q. (2012). Fractal/multifractal modelling of geochemical exploration data.
[15] Jolliffe, I.T., (2002). Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York,547 NY.487 pp.
[16] Brigham, E.O., (1974). The Fast Fourier Transform. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
[17] Jennison, R.C., (1961). Fourier Transforms and Convolutions, Pergamon Press, NY.
[18] Qiuming, C. (2006). Multifractal modelling and spectrum analysis: Methods and applications to gamma ray spectrometer data from southwestern Nova Scotia, Canada. Science in China Series D, 49(3), 283-294.
[19] Zuo, R. (2012). Exploring the effects of cell size in geochemical mapping, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 112, 357-367.
[20] Asadi Haroni H. (2008). First Stage Drilling Report on Dalli Porphyry Cu-Au Prospect, Central Province of Iran, technical Report.
[21] Shahi, H., Ghavami, R. R., & Kamkar, R. A. (2018). Identification of mineralization pattern in high frequencies of geochemical data by using the new approach of DWT-PCA. Journal of analytical and numerical methods in mining engineering, 7, 1- 11. (in Persian)
[22] Mahdiyanfar, H. (2019). Detection of Mo geochemical anomaly in depth using a new scenario based on spectrum–area fractal analysis. Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3), 695-704. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 555 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 469 |
||