تاثیر نقشهای استراتژیک بنگاه مادر بر الگوی اداره کسب و کارها | ||
| کاوش‌های مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 10، شماره 19، شهریور 1397، صفحه 233-251 اصل مقاله (356.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| عبداله اسدزاده* | ||
| استادیار مدیریت بازرگانی (سیاستگذاری)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد رباط کریم | ||
| چکیده | ||
| اداره کسب و کارهای تابعه از جمله وظایف اصلی هر شرکت هولدینگ است که تناسب آن با جهت گیری‌های کلی بنگاه مادر که در قالب نقشهای استراتژیک تبلور می‌یابد ضروری می‌باشد. این پژوهش درصدد است تا تاثیر نقشهای یاد شده را بر الگوهای اداره کسب و کارها یا شیوههای مادری مورد بررسی قرار دهد. پژوهش حاضر از منظر نتیجه، پژوهشی توسعهای، از منظر هدف، توصیفی و از منظر داده کمی می‌باشد. در این پژوهش پس از توسعه مدل تحقیق و استخراج فرضیههای مربوطه، پرسشنامه‌ای مشتمل بر 30 سوال جهت احصاء نقش های استراتژیک بنگاه مادر و شیوه مادری طراحی گردید و روایی و پایایی آن مورد تایید قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل 500 هولدینگ ایرانی بود که اندازه نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران برابر 81 تعیین وطی نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده پرسشنامهها میان هولدینگها توزیع شد. برای آزمون فرضیههای تحقیق از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل سازی مربعات جزئی و ضرایب مسیراستفاده گردید. نتایج حاصله از معناداری تاثیر نقشهای مادری بر شیوههای مادری از یکسو و تاثیر هر دو سازه یاد شده بر عملکرد مالی ستاد مادر حکایت داشت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بنگاه مادر؛ شرکت هولدینگ؛ شیوههای مادری؛ نقشهای استراتژیک مادر؛ عملکرد مالی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Corporate Strategic Roles on Corporate Parenting Styles | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abdollah Asadzadeh | ||
| Assistant Professor Business Management (Policy Making), Islamic Azad University, Robat Karim Branch | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Directing subsidiaries is one of the key tasks of a holding company, and the alignment of this task with overall firm directions, reflected in strategic roles, is crucial. This study aims to investigate the effects of such roles on the types of directing subsidiaries or parenting styles. The present research is a developing study from the viewpoint of results, a descriptive one from the viewpoint of goals, and a quantitative study from the viewpoint of data. To do the research, after the research model was generated and the corresponding hypotheses were extracted, a questionnaire including 30 questions was made to determine the parenting strategic roles and the parenting styles. The validity and the reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed. The statistical population of research included 500 Iranian corporate parents. The sample size was determined by the Cochran’s formula as 81 units. The questionnaires were distributed through simple random sampling. To test the hypotheses, structural equation modeling was done using partial least squares and path coefficients. The results confirmed that parental roles have a significant influence on parenting styles. There were also proofs for the influence of both mentioned variables on corporate parent financial performance. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Corporate parent, Holding company, Parenting strategic roles, Parenting styles, Financial performance | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1- Alexander, M. (1992). Disintermediation - Redefining the Role of Corporate Headquarters. Long Range Planning, 25(6), 110-112.
2- Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
3- Birkinshaw, J., Braunerhjelm, P., Holm, U., &Terjesen, S. (2006). Why Do Some Multinational Corporations Relocate Their Headquarters Overseas? Strategic Management Journal, 27, 681-700
4- Camisón C. &Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1): 2891–2902
5- Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6- Chandler, A. D. (1962). The functions of HQ unit in the multi-business firm, Strategic Management Journal, 12:31-50.
7- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (295–336). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8- Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1998). Creating Corporate Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 70-84
9- Collis, D. J., Young, D., & Goold, M. (2007). The Size, Structure, and Performance of Corporate Headquarters. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 383-405
10- Fathollahi, A. (2011). A Model for Selecting Parenting styles by a Corporate Parent in its Subsidiaries Based on Resource Based View (Doctoral dissertation). Iran, Tehran, Allame Tabatabaee University.
11- Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(3): 39-50.
12- Foss, N. J. (1997). On the Rationales of Corporate Headquarters. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2), 313-338.
13- Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (1988). Strategies and Styles the role of the center in managing diversified corporations. Basil Blackwell.
14- Goold, M., & Quinn, J. (1990). Strategic control: milestones for long-term performance. London: Hutchinson.
15- Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate level strategy: Creating Value in the Multi Business Company. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2): 195-204.
17- Hungenberg, H. (1993). How to Ensure That Headquarters Add Value. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 62-73
18- Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy. London: Prentice Hall.
19- Markides, C. C. (2002). Corporate Strategy: The Role of the Centre. In Pettigrew, A. & Thomas, H., & Whittington, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Strategy and Management, 98-111. London: Sage publication.
20- Menz, M., Kunisch, S., & Collis D. j. (2013). What Do We Know About Corporate Headquarters? A Review, Integration, and Research Agenda. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 14-16
21- Mishra, A., & Akbar M. (2007). Empirical Examination of Diversification Strategies in Business Groups: Evidence from Emerging Markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2(1), 22-38.
22- Moss, E., Rousseau, D., Parent, S., St-Laurent, D. & Saintonge, J. (1998). Correlated of Attachment at School Age: Maternal Reported Stress, Mother-Child Interaction, and Behavior Problems. Child Development, 69 (5): 1390-1405.
23- Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory, (3rd Ed.). New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
24- Pettifer, D. (1998). Measuring the Performance of the Corporate Centre. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 783-785
25- Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43-59.
26- Villalonga, B. (2004). Does Diversification Cause the "Diversification Discount"? Financial Management, 33(2), 5-27. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 949 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,343 |
||