طراحی الگوی شهرت دیجیتال برند در صنعت بانکداری | ||
| کاوشهای مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 40، مرداد 1404، صفحه 1-21 اصل مقاله (525.53 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jbar.2025.21781.4447 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علیرضا حمیدزاده اربابی1؛ ناصر سیف اللهی* 2؛ قاسم زارعی2؛ محمد باشکوه اجیرلو2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه، با افزایش شدت رقابت و افزایش انتظارات مشتریان، رویکرد بانکها نسبت به مشتریان تغییر یافته و بحث شهرت برای بانکها به امری حیاتی و مهم بدل شده است. از طرف دیگر، شهرت دیجیتال برند یکی از عوامل اصلی مؤثر بر رقابتپذیری آنها و جذب مشتریان جدید میباشد. بنابراین، مدیران جهت دستیابی به موفقیت پایدار نیازمند کنترل اطلاعات و محتوای تاثیرگذار بر شهرت دیجیتال برند بانکها میباشند. با توجه به اهمیت این موضوع، هدف پژوهش، ارائه مدل شهرت دیجیتال برند در صنعت بانکداری است. روش پژوهش، براساس رویکرد کیفی و بر مبنای روش پژوهش داده بنیاد استراوس و کوربین انجام گرفت. جمعآوری دادهها، از طریق مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته صورت پذیرفت. جامعۀ پژوهش، اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاهها و مدیران ارشد بانکی (متخصص در زمینه بازاریابی و انفورماتیک) بودند و نمونهگیری، به صورت هدفمند صورت پذیرفت، بر این اساس، ۱۲ مصاحبه تا حصول اشباع نظری انجام شد. تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی با استفاده از نرمافزار MAXQDA صورت گرفت. براساس نتایج، مدلی متشکل از عوامل درونسازمانی، برون سازمانی و فناورانه برای شرایط علّی، ویژگیهای سازمان برای شرایط زمینهای، ویژگیهای بازبین و چالشهای مدیریتی برای شرایط مداخلهگر، برندسازی، حضور دیجیتال قدرتمند و راهبردهای فرایندی و عملیاتی برای راهبردها و نهایتاً پیامدهای مالی، نگرشی و کارکردی برای پیامدهای حاصل از شهرت دیجیتال برند ارائه گردید. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| برند؛ شهرت؛ دیجیتال؛ صنعت بانکداری؛ نظریه داده بنیاد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing a Brand Digital Reputation Model in Banking Industry Using Grounded Theory Method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Alireza Hamidzadeh Arbabi1؛ Naser Seifollahi2؛ Ghasem Zarei2؛ Mohammad Bashokouh Ajirlou2 | ||
| 1Ph.D Candidate of Business Management, Faculty of social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Business Management, Faculty of social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Extended Abstract Introduction: Today we are witnessing the dramatic expansion of social media and e-commerce in general, and this phenomenon will grow exponentially in the future. Currently, digital media has brought convenience to consumers, and they are increasingly using digital channels to process information and make purchase decisions. With the development of communication and information technologies, reviews and content created by users regarding the reputation of the relevant brand can influence consumer behaviors and choices. Digital transformation brings both new challenges and opportunities when it comes to reputational risk management. Therefore, it is obvious that in such a situation, the vital role of every industry is to protect their companies and brands from scandal and public infamy. In the banking sector as well, the increase in the intensity of competition and globalization, along with technological advances, have changed the approach of banks towards customers, and the issue of reputation has become vital and important for banks. Without brand digital reputation management, increasing economic efficiency, increasing the level of attracting and retaining customers, earning more profit and achieving sustainable success in the long term as the most important goals of any business, especially banks, will be challenging. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of investigating how to manage the brand digital reputation and how to use the benefits of digital platforms by banks. The current research is trying to find out what the brand digital reputation model is like for public and private banks and what components and indicators does it has by studying the theoretical foundations and asking opinions from professors and experts and conducting field studies. Methodology: The present study is of a qualitative type and is an exploratory-applied research, which, due to its exploratory nature, Foundation's data method has been used. The required data were collected through semi-structured interviews with faculty members and senior bank managers (experts in marketing and informatics). A purposeful sampling method was used to collect data based on which, 12 interviews were conducted and the basis for completing the interviews was data saturation. At the same time as the interviews were conducted, the data were documented according to the process of Strauss and Corbin. Data analysis was performed in three stages of open coding, axial coding and selective coding using MAXQDA 2020 software. It should also be mentioned that in order to ensure the validity of the research findings, the method proposed by Lincoln and Guba was used. Discussion and Results: After examining the data obtained from the conducted interviews, 12 main categories and 38 subcategories were extracted. Based on the analyzes conducted on the interviews and the obtained codes, three categories of intra-organizational factors, extra-organizational factors, and technological factors were classified as the main categories of causal conditions; The category of organization characteristics was classified as the main category of underlying conditions; Two categories of reviewer characteristics and management challenges were classified as the main categories of intervening conditions; Three categories of branding, strong digital presence, and process and operational strategies were classified as the main categories of strategies and three categories of financial consequences, attitudinal consequences and functional consequences were classified as the main categories of brand digital reputation consequences. Conclusion: The results of the present study consist of identifying the main variables related to brand digital reputation and presenting a model related to it. Based on this, the most important causal conditions that justify the brand digital reputation are customer relationship management, knowledge management, advertising and public relations, social responsibility, regulatory and legal environment, economic factors, social and cultural factors, industry and competitors, technical performance, user experience, technological advancement and technical support. Also based on the intervening conditions and by presenting the brand digital reputation model, cumulative experience, psychological factors, demographic factors, managerial weaknesses and rapid environmental changes will be managed in a favorable manner. On the other hand, based on underlying conditions, organizational culture, organizational dynamics, organizational resource capacity, and organizational governance have been identified as the most important areas for the development of brand digital reputation. On the other hand, based on the strategies obtained from the research, in order to create and develop brand digital reputation, managers can try to expand and develop their brand digital reputation by defining the brand identity, co-branding, telling the brand story, providing exceptional service to customers, penetration among users, strong online activity, conducting market research and integrated marketing communications. Finally, with the presentation of the digital brand reputation model, the most important outcomes include increasing sales, increasing profitability, increasing market share, increasing stock value, brand preference, brand purchase intention, increasing the favorable image of the organization, customer loyalty, and attracting talented experts and employees. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Brand, Reputation, Digital, Banking industry, Grounded Theory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aaker, D.A. (2014). Aaker on Branding, New York: Morgan James Publishing. Aggarwal, A., & Saxena, N. (2023). Examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation and brand equity in Indian banking industry. Journal of Public Affairs, 23(1), e2838. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2838 Al Olaimat, F., Habes, M., Al Hadeed, A. Y., & Al Jwaniat, M. I. (2022). Reputation management through social networking platforms for PR purposes: A SEM-based study in the Jordan. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 1009359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1009359 Al Shobaki, M. J., Abusharekh, N. H., Abu-Naser, S. S., & El Talla, S. A. (2020). Digital Reputation in the University of Palestine: An Analytical Perspective of Employees' Point of View. International Journal of Academic Accounting, Finance and Management Research (IJAAFMR), 4(9). https://philpapers.org/rec/ALSDRI Amrozi, A. I., Ghofur, A., Damayanti, D. D., Suprapto, H., & Sulaeman, M. M. (2024). Dynamics of Social Media Interaction: Implications for the Manifestation of Digital Business Image and Reputation in Public Perception. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 2(1), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v2i1.141 Aydemir, I. (2020). Social Media Automation Effects On Brand Reputation “A Study Of Social Media Automation Effects On Brand Reputation In The Digital Age”. [Master's thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia]. Venezia. Italy. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17719 Azhdari, A., Nazemi Ardakani, M., & Taghian Omani, E. (2023). Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Reputation, Employer Branding, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Empirical Research in Accounting, 13(4), 221-244. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2023.44319.3149 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 389 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 366 |
||