Comparative Numerical Analysis of Indirect Tensile Strength Assessment Methods in Rock Engineering | |
| روش های تحلیلی و عددی در مهندسی معدن | |
| مقاله 6، دوره 15، شماره 43، تیر 1404، صفحه 55-67 اصل مقاله (1.35 M) | |
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | |
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/anm.2025.22387.1648 | |
| نویسندگان | |
| Hadi Fattahi* ؛ Hossein Ghaedi؛ Abolfazl Faghihi | |
| Dept. of Geomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Geoscience Engineering, Arak University of Technology, Arak, Iran | |
| چکیده | |
| This study presents an in-depth comparative numerical analysis of three distinct methods employed to evaluate the indirect tensile strength of rock materials: the Brazilian Tensile Test (BT), the Three-Point Bending Test (TPBT), and the Four-Point Bending Test (FPBT). Utilizing advanced simulation capabilities provided by the three-dimensional Particle Flow Code (PFC3D) software, the tensile behavior of rock samples was modeled and assessed under the unique loading conditions associated with each testing approach. The novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive comparison of these three methods using PFC3D simulations, which has not been extensively explored in previous research. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in tensile strength values obtained from each method, with the FPBT consistently yielding the highest tensile strength measurements due to its superior stress distribution. The BT method, despite its widespread use and simplicity, revealed several limitations, including significant stress concentration around the loading points and a non-homogeneous distribution of stress across the sample. In contrast, both the TPBT and FPBT methods demonstrated advantages in terms of loading control and stress distribution. The comparative analysis revealed notable discrepancies in the tensile strength values obtained from each method, underscoring the critical role that test method selection plays in accurately characterizing the tensile strength of rock. Overall, this study provides new insights into the mechanical behavior of rocks under different testing conditions and offers recommendations for selecting appropriate tensile strength methods based on specific engineering applications. The use of PFC3D simulations to uncover these discrepancies represents a significant advancement in the field, offering a more accurate and reliable approach for evaluating rock tensile strength in various engineering and geological contexts. | |
| کلیدواژهها | |
| Brazilian tensile test؛ Particle flow code؛ Four-point bending test؛ Numerical simulations؛ Three-point bending test | |
| عنوان مقاله [English] | |
| Comparative Numerical Analysis of Indirect Tensile Strength Assessment Methods in Rock Engineering | |
| نویسندگان [English] | |
| Hadi Fattahi؛ Hossein Ghaedi؛ Abolfazl Faghihi | |
| Dept. of Geomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Geoscience Engineering, Arak University of Technology, Arak, Iran | |
| چکیده [English] | |
| This study presents an in-depth comparative numerical analysis of three distinct methods employed to evaluate the indirect tensile strength of rock materials: the Brazilian Tensile Test (BT), the Three-Point Bending Test (TPBT), and the Four-Point Bending Test (FPBT). Utilizing advanced simulation capabilities provided by the three-dimensional Particle Flow Code (PFC3D) software, the tensile behavior of rock samples was modeled and assessed under the unique loading conditions associated with each testing approach. The novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive comparison of these three methods using PFC3D simulations, which has not been extensively explored in previous research. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in tensile strength values obtained from each method, with the FPBT consistently yielding the highest tensile strength measurements due to its superior stress distribution. The BT method, despite its widespread use and simplicity, revealed several limitations, including significant stress concentration around the loading points and a non-homogeneous distribution of stress across the sample. In contrast, both the TPBT and FPBT methods demonstrated advantages in terms of loading control and stress distribution. The comparative analysis revealed notable discrepancies in the tensile strength values obtained from each method, underscoring the critical role that test method selection plays in accurately characterizing the tensile strength of rock. Overall, this study provides new insights into the mechanical behavior of rocks under different testing conditions and offers recommendations for selecting appropriate tensile strength methods based on specific engineering applications. The use of PFC3D simulations to uncover these discrepancies represents a significant advancement in the field, offering a more accurate and reliable approach for evaluating rock tensile strength in various engineering and geological contexts. | |
| کلیدواژهها [English] | |
| Brazilian tensile test, Particle flow code, Four-point bending test, Numerical simulations, Three-point bending test | |
| مراجع | |
|
[1] Levin M Determinationof Rock Mass Properties by In Situ tests in the Gilboa Pumped Storage Project. In: ISRM VietRock International Workshop, 2015. ISRM, pp ISRM-VIETROCK-2015-2007
[2] Palmström A, Singh R (2001) the deformation modulus of rock masses—comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 16 (2):115-131
[3] Zhang S-h, Miao X-x, Zhao H-y (1999) Influence of test methods on measured results of rock tensile strength. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao (Journal of China University of Mining and Technology) 28
[4] DURELLI A, PARKS V (1974) Controlled failure of rock disks and rings loaded in diametral compression-discussion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 11 (8):341-342
[5] Zhang X, Zhang Q, Yuan S, Wang C, Gao Q (2014) Development of test device for direct axial tension on rock and its application. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 33 (12):2517-2523
[6] Van Vliet MR, Van Mier JG (2000) Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension. Engineering fracture mechanics 65 (2-3):165-188
[7] Jinmin C (2008) Bending test for tensile strength of rock samples. 工程地质学报 16 (S1):317-319
[8] Es-Saheb MH, Albedah A, Benyahia F (2011) Diametral compression test: validation using finite element analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 57:501-509
[9] Yang L, Jiang Y, Li S, Li B (2013) Experimental and numerical research on 3D crack growth in rocklike material subjected to uniaxial tension. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 139 (10):1781-1788
[10] Allena R, Cluzel C (2014) Identification of anisotropic tensile strength of cortical bone using Brazilian test. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 38:134-142
[11] Sabih G, Paneru LP, Tarefder RA (2016) Simulation of the Brazilian test on concrete discs to verify the size effect law. In: Geo-China 2016. pp 18-25
[12] Li Y (2018) A review of shear and tensile strengths of the Malan Loess in China. Engineering Geology 236:4-10
[13] Zhou J, Zhang L, Yang D, Braun A, Han Z (2017) Investigation of the quasi-brittle failure of alashan granite viewed from laboratory experiments and grain-based discrete element modeling. Materials 10 (7):835
[14] Khosravi A, Simon R, Rivard P (2017) The shape effect on the morphology of the fracture surface induced by the Brazilian test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 93:201-209
[15] Liao Z, Zhu J, Tang C (2019) Numerical investigation of rock tensile strength determined by direct tension, Brazilian and three-point bending tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 115:21-32
[16] Efe T, Sengun N, Demirdag S, Tufekci K, Altindag R Effect of sample dimension on three and four points bending tests of fine crystalline marble and its relationship with direct tensile strength. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019. vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012093
[17] Golshani A, Ramezanzad A (2019) Estimation of tensile strength for granitic rocks by using discrete element approach. International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 13 (8):553-557
[18] Asadi P, Ashrafi MJ, Fakhimi A (2022) Physical and numerical evaluation of effect of specimen size on dynamic tensile strength of rock. Computers and Geotechnics 142:104538
[19] Liu G-Y, Xu W-J, Govender N, Wilke DN (2021) Simulation of rock fracture process based on GPU-accelerated discrete element method. Powder Technology 377:640-656
[20] Xue G, Yilmaz E, Feng G, Cao S (2022) Analysis of tensile mechanical characteristics of fibre reinforced backfill through splitting tensile and three-point bending tests. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 36 (3):218-234
[21] Pérez-Rey I, Muñoz-Ibáñez A, González-Fernández MA, Muñiz-Menéndez M, Penabad MH, Estévez-Ventosa X, Delgado J, Alejano LR (2023) Size effects on the tensile strength and fracture toughness of granitic rock in different tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 15 (9):2179-2192
[22] Zhang X-P, Zhang P-Y, Ji P-Q, Zhang H, Zhang Q (2023) The Applicability of Brazilian Test Loading with Different Platens to Measure Tensile Strength of Rock: A Numerical Study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering:1-28
[23] Zhang J, Dong W, Zhang B (2023) Experimental study on local crack propagation of concrete under three-point bending. Construction and Building Materials 401:132699
[24] Akazawa T (1943) New test method for evaluating internal stress due to compression of concrete (the splitting tension test)(part 1). J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 29:777-787
[25] Carneiro F A new method to determine the tensile strength of concrete. In: Proceedings of the 5th meeting of the Brazilian Association for Technical Rules, 1943. vol 16. pp 126-129
[26] Pan X, Huang J, Gan Z, Dong S, Hua W (2021) Analysis of mixed-mode I/II/III fracture toughness based on a three-point bending sandstone specimen with an inclined crack. Applied Sciences 11 (4):1652
[27] Martinez-Barrera G, Vigueras-Santiago E, Gencel O, Hagg Lobland H (2011) Polymer concretes: a description and methods for modification and improvement. Journal of Materials Education 33 (1):37
|
|
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 246
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 165