بررسی تغییرات ارزش افزوده داخلی و ارزش افزوده وارداتی ناشی از صادرات ناخالص در اقتصاد ایران برای سال های منتخب به کمک حذف فرضی و تخصص گرایی عمودی | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 34، مهر 1404، صفحه 1-44 اصل مقاله (1.16 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2024.21794.2605 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مینو خان زاده1؛ فاضل مریدی فریمانی* 2؛ حسین صمصامی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در شرایط کنونی تجارت عموماً در ارزشافزوده معنا مییابد و تغییرات ارزشافزوده در تجارت سود و زیان کشورها را مشخص میکنند. منافع ناشی از تجارت در ایران هم با تجارت در ارزشافزوده سنجیده میشود. به طور کلی پژوهش حاضر نحوه اتصال اقتصاد ایران به اقتصاد بینالملل را بررسی میکند. ازاینرو این مطالعه از جداول داده – ستانده بانک مرکزی برای سالهای 1378، 1383، 1389 و 1395 استفاده میکند. نتایج پژوهش نشان میدهد که تغییرات ارزشافزوده داخلی ناشی از صادرات ناخالص از 97 درصد در سال 1378 به 93 درصد، در سال 1383 به 96 درصد، در سال 1389 به 95 درصد و در سال 1395 به 93 درصد رسیده است. تغییرات واردات ارزشافزوده برای صادرات ناخالص که نشان دهنده ادغام عمودی اقتصاد ایران با اقتصاد بینالملل است از 3 درصد در سال 1378 به 4 درصد در سال 1383، به 5 درصد در سال 1389 و به 7 درصد در سال 1395 رسیده است. یعنی بااینکه اقتصاد ایران همچنان تا حد زیادی خودکفاست اما روند آن نزولی است. همچنین بررسیها حاکی از آن است که اتصال اقتصاد ایران به اقتصاد بینالملل در صادرات ارزش افزوده از طریق فعالیتهای منبعمحور است و واردات ارزشافزوده کشور عموماٌ شامل فعالیتهای تولید محصولات شمیایی و تولید فلزات اساسی است. برای بهرهمندی بیشتر از تجارت نیز پیشنهاد میشود ایران با منطقهگرایی به هاب نهادههای اولیه تبدیل شود و با فراوری این نهادههای با اقتصاد بینالملل ادغام بیشتری ایجاد کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزشافزوده داخلی ناشی از صادرات ناخالص؛ تخصصگرایی عمودی؛ داده &ndash؛ ستانده | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating Domestic Value Added and Imorted Vale Added in Gross Export of Iran for Selected Years by Hypothetical Extraction and Vertical Specialization | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Minoo Khanzadeh1؛ Fazel Moridi Farimani2؛ Hossein Samsami2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor in Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: Energy Despite the existing various activities in Iran and in important global corridors, the trade balance without oil is always negative. Although the trade balance reflects the state of trade to some extent, it cannot comment on trade in value added. Since trade in value added has become increasingly important today, the main purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: ‘How can Iran change the approach of its trade?’, ‘From which activities is domestic added value in gross exports obtained and how is its trend?’, ‘How is the gap between the share of exports and the share of value added in gross exports by each activity?’, ‘How is the vertical specialization in Iran and how is its trend?, and ‘In general, how is Iran's economy related to the international economy?’ Since, input -output tables include all the activities of an economy and show trade and added value by each activity, this research uses those tables for 1999, 2004, 2010 and 2016 (the last available table) released by the Central Bank to calculate DVA and VS of Iran over time. Methodology: To calculate the domestic value added in gross exports (DVA) and vertical specialization (VS), we need to plot internal input-output tables in constant prices. Then, the standard Leontief quantity model is used. To obtain DVA, the following equations are used. Findings and Discussion: Based on the results, Table 1 can be analyzed in two ways, in rows and in columns. When they are analyzed in columns, the activities can be classified in terms of upstream and downstream, and structural changes can be visualized when they are analyzed in rows. Iran’s major exports has invariably included crude oil, natural gas, and petroleum products. In 1999, planting crops, agriculture, horticulture, textile production and animal breeding were of relatively high exports. In 2004, the activities of textile production and animal breeding were no longer important export products; there were only crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products. In 2010, the production of chemical and pharmaceutical products was added to the important export activities. In 2016, basic metals, food and beverage were produced more. Regarding the trend of domestic added value in gross exports (DVA), it was on a downward trend; it decreased from 97% in 1999 to 93% in 2016. This means that, in 1999, for every 100 Rials of gross export, 97 Rials were domestic exports of Iran's economy. In 2016, this amount decreased to 93%. It means that the self-sufficiency of Iran's economy has decreased to some extent, but it is still significant. In 1999, the highest amount of DVA (except for services) respectively belonged to crude oil and natural gas extraction, crop planting, animal breeding, textile production, and non-metallic mineral products. In 2004, it belonged to the activities such as extraction of crude oil and natural gas, planting of crops, production of petroleum products, production of non-metallic minerals, production of basic metals, production of metal products, and breeding of animals. In 2010, the highest amount of DVA belonged to the extraction of crude oil and natural gas, the production of petroleum products, the planting of crops, the production of chemical and pharmaceutical materials, and the production of non-metallic mineral products. In 2016, it belonged to the extraction of crude oil and natural gas, the production of chemical and pharmaceutical materials, the production of petroleum products, the planting of crops, the production of basic metals, and the breeding of animals. The main imports of Iran's economy generally had a certain trend in all the studied years. The imports regarded activities such as construction, vehicles, production of food and beverages, production of basic metals, planting crops, materials and chemical products, and machinery and equipment. In general, the trend of VS (imports for gross exports or so-called vertical specialization) was upward and increased from 3% in 1999 to 7% in 2015; This means that, for every 100 Rials of gross export, the direct and indirect import requirement increased from 3 Rials to 7 Rials. In other words, in these years, Iran's vertical specialization increased with the international economy. In 1999, the most vertical specialization respectively belonged to the activities of basic metal production, machinery and equipment production, chemical and pharmaceutical products production, mining, and planting of crops. In 2004, it belonged to the production of chemical and pharmaceutical products, production of basic metals and production of petroleum products, and production of machinery and equipment, respectively. In 2010, it belonged to the activities of crude oil and natural gas extraction, production of chemical and pharmaceutical products, production of basic metals, and production of machinery and equipment. In 2016, it belonged to the production of chemical and pharmaceutical products, production of basic metals, production of machinery and equipment, and production of food and beverages, respectively. Conclusions and Policy Implications: In general, the degree of integration of Iran's economy with the international economy is very low; Iran's economy is largely self-sufficient. The connection of Iran's economy to the international economy is through resource-oriented activities, and its vertical specialization is by chemical and pharmaceutical production, basic metal production, and crop planting. According to the findings, the activities of leather production, basic metal production, textiles, and machinery and equipment production create more added value compared to their export share. Considering that Iran has a suitable geographical position, in accordance with the recommendations of the Global Production Network theory (GNP), it can form a production network (by trade) while becoming a hub in the fields of source-oriented activities and, by importing basic inputs, develop through activities such as chemical and pharmaceutical production and production of metals, machinery and equipment. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Domestic Value Added in Gross Export, Vertical Specialization, Input-Output Tables | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahrend, R. (2006). How to Sustain Growth in a Resource Based Economy? The Main Concepts and Their Application to the Russian Case. OECD Economic Department, 478: 1-34. Bamber, P., Fernandez-Stark, K., Gereffi, G., & Guinn, A. (2014). Connecting local producers in developing countries to regional and global value chains, OECD Economic Department, 160: 1-37. Banacloche, S., Cadarso, M. Á., & Monsalve, F. (2020). Implications of measuring value added in exports with a regional input-output table. A case of study in South America. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52: 130-140. Banouei, A. A. (2012). Evaluation of the different treatments and methods of separating imports with emphasis on 1381 IOT of Iran. The Journal of Economic Policy, 4(8): 31-74. (In Persian) Banouei, A. A., & Fahimi, B. (2021). Application of Average Propagation Length in Identifying Production Chains and its Relation to Value-added in Gross Exports and Vertical Specialization: Case Study of Iran. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat-E-Eghtesadi), 56(1): 25-58. (In Persian) Dinitorkmani, Poriya (2012). A review of international trade theories. Economic Journal, Reviewing Economic Issues and Policies, 12(2): 104-99. (In Persian) Dodge, A. (2020). The Singaporean natural gas hub: reassembling global production networks and markets in Asia. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(5): 1241-1262. Elrasheed, M. M. (2024). Transportation Infrastructure and Food Security in Saudi Arabia. Food and Nutrition Security in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Vol. 1: National Analysis of Agricultural and Food Security (pp. 365-381). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Feenstra, R. C. (2015). Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton university press. 2: 1 – 496. Gerdes, W. D. (2022). Adam Smith's Subjective Theory of International Trade. Journal of Economic Insight, 48: (2). Googerdchian, A., & Mirjaberi, Z. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Political and Commercial Risks on Iran’s Non-Oil Exports to the Main Export Destination Countries, with an Emphasis on Export Credit Insurance Subsidy. The Journal of Economic Policy, 9(17): 119-143. (In Persian) Gorbanzadeh, Mansour (2013). Investigating the relationship between commercial exchange and its changes in Iran. Economic Journal, 14(5): 55-76. (In Persian) Hossain, M. S., & Van Baars, J. (2022). Global value chain: An empirical investigation of Bangladesh’s garments and textile industry. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(3): 51-60. Landesmann, M. A., & Stöllinger, R. (2019). Structural change, trade and global production networks: An ‘appropriate industrial policy’for peripheral and catching-up economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48: 7-23. Luck, P. (2019). Global supply chains, firm scope and vertical integration: evidence from China. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1): 173-198. Mansouri, S. A. (2022). A Brief Review of the Evolution of International Trade Theories. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 14(2): 93-108. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions (Vol. 2). publisher:Cambridge university press. Mohajeri, P., & Banouei, A. A. (2021). Estimating Domestic Value-Added in Gross Exports and Its Relation to Vertical Specialization: The Case of Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 10(1): 7-29. Mokhtar, H., Redi, A. P., Krishnamoorthy, M., & Ernst, A. T. (2019). An intermodal hub location problem for container distribution in Indonesia. Computers & Operations Research, 104: 415-432. Murdock, C. W. (2020). Why Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage Regarding Foreign Trade Doesn't Work in Today's Global Economy. U. Bologna L. 5(1): 59–130. Najarzadeh, R., Dargahi, H., Agheli, L., & Biabany Khameneh, K. (2020). Measuring Iran's Economy Status Indicators in Global Value Chains and Comparison with Selected Countries. Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 28(94): 101-129. (In Persian) Neilson, J., Dwiartama, A., Fold, N., & Permadi, D. (2020). Resource-based industrial policy in an era of global production networks: Strategic coupling in the Indonesian cocoa sector. World Development, 135: 105045. Pashazanus, P., & Banouei, A. A., & Bahrami, J. (2013). Political analyzes of the role of imports in measuring the importance of Iran's economic sectors. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies (IJTS) Quarterly, 17(67): 81-100. (In Persian) Mohammadi, Mohammad, Younes Noorollahi, Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo, and Hossein Yousefi. "Energy hub: From a model to a concept–A review." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80 (2017): 1512-1527. Schumacher, R. (2012). Adam Smith's theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5(2): 54-80. Sharify, N., & Esmaeili, H. (2023). Virtual water trade in Iran: An input-output analysis. The Journal of Economic Policy, 14(28): 49-73. (In Persian) Sherkat, A., Banouei, A., Shahhosseini, S., Bazzazan, F., & Kianirad, A. (2023). Application of Hypothetical Extraction and Conventional Method in Measuring Value-added in Trede: Equivalence or Different Result?, Iranian Economic Development Analyses,9(1): 123-142. (In Persian) Yeung, H. W. C., & Coe, N. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic geography, 91(1): 29-58. Zhu, H. (2019). A quantitative analysis of global value chains: why has domestic value-added of China’s exports increased?. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 13(2): 403-423. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 662 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 384 |
||