اثر ابعاد سه گانه جهانی شدن بر جداسازی رشد اقتصادی از مصرف انرژی و آلودگی | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 33، فروردین 1404، صفحه 248-285 اصل مقاله (789.8 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2024.21810.2606 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سعید راسخی* 1؛ سارا قنبرتبار2 | ||
| 1استاد اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد انرژی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد اقتصاد انرژی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نگرانی درباره سه گانه انرژی(امنیت انرژی، توسعه پایدار و رقابت پذیری) موجب اهمیت یافتن جداسازی رشد اقتصادی از مصرف انرژی و آلودگی شده است. با توجه به روند رو به گسترش جهانی شدن در حوزههای مختلف سیاسی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی، سئوال تحقیق حاضر این است که آیا جهانی شدن در ابعاد مختلف آن میتواند به جداسازی رشد اقتصادی، مصرف انرژی و آلودگی منجر شود؟ برای پاسخ به این سئوال، از روش گشتاورهای تعمیم یافته برای 94 کشور منتخب بر اساس حداکثر دادههای قابل دسترس طی دوره زمانی 2021-2000 استفاده شده و در مرحله نخست، با استفاده از رویکرد تاپیو، بازه جداسازی برای کشورهای منتخب مشخص شده و سپس، اثرمولفههای جهانی شدن (اقتصادی، اجتماعی و سیاسی) بر بازه جداسازی مورد آزمون قرار گرفته است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان میدهد که جهانی شدن در هر سه بعد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و سیاسی موجب بهبود جداسازی رشد اقتصادی از مصرف انرژی میشود. در مقابل، جهانی شدن اجتماعی نتوانسته است موجب جداسازی رشد اقتصادی از انتشار دی اکسید کربن شود. این یافته میتواند ناشی از تسلط روحیه مصرفگرایی، الگوی مصرفی انرژیبر و عدم درک و عدم توجه کامل به چالشهای جهانی در خصوص محیط زیست باشد. توصیه اصلی این تحقیق به سیاستگذاران، توجه ویژه به ابعاد مختلف جهانی شدن با محوریت بعد اقتصادی، اصلاحات در حوزه اجتماعی و نیز ارتقای تکنولوژی برای حصول به جداسازی نسبی رشد اقتصادی از مصرف انرژی و آلودگی است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| جداسازی؛ مصرف انرژی؛ جهانی شدن؛ کشورهای منتخب؛ گشتاورهای تعمیم یافته | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of the Triple Dimensions of Globalization on the Decoupling of Economic Growth from Energy Consumption and Pollution | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saeed Rasekhi1؛ Sara Ghanbartabar2 | ||
| 1Professor of Economics, Department of Energy Economics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran, | ||
| 2MA in Energy Economics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: Economic development is closely related to the consumption of natural resources. In particular, fossil energy is a vital resource for urbanization and industrialization and the main driving force for the development of a modern society. What is the way to decouple economy from energy or at least coordinate between the two? Globalization is like a modern evolution. By removing barriers among countries and expanding business and investment and sharing technology, it causes economic growth and accelerates it. In this regard, the aim of this research is to test the hypothesis that globalization (economic, social and political) improves the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption and pollution. Methodology: The main goal of this research is to investigate the effect of economic, social and political globalization on the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in 94 selected countries based on the maximum available data during the period of 2000-2021. For this purpose, based on the literature in the field, a model was chosen and specified in the form of Equations 1 to 6. In these equations, the production coefficients (α1 and β1) are estimates of Tapio's decoupling index. The independent variables in the equations include economic globalization (models 1 and 2), social globalization (models 3 and 4), political globalization (models 5 and 6), economic structure (industry share), energy price, technology, and urbanization. They were entered multiplicatively with production in Equations 1 to 6 in order to estimate their effects on decoupling and identify the change of the decoupling interval: In these equations, is energy consumption, is carbon dioxide emission, is economic growth, is economic structure, is economic globalization index, is social globalization index, is political globalization index, is energy price, is urbanization share, and is technology. They are all for country i in year t. These equations were calculated using the generalized method of moments (GMM). In addition to its dynamics and ability to solve the problems of autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity, this method poses no problem of endogeneity of explanatory variables. Findings and discussion: According to the results, the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption was placed in the first region of the Tapio coordinates, and its value shows a weak decoupling. Specifically, the coefficients of the selected models (1, 3 and 5) were found to be 0.339911, 0.309906 and 0.312093, respectively. The positive effect of economic growth on energy consumption was expected because every economic activity and its development requires energy. The coefficients of the multiplicative variables of economic, social and political dimensions of globalization were -0.06765, -0.003012 and -0.00991939, respectively. Based on these results, if economic growth is accompanied by the three dimensions of globalization, the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption will be improved. The findings showed that, with these variables, there was no significant change in the decoupling interval. Also, according to the results, despite the worsening effect of economic structure (industry share) on the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption, the decoupling interval would not change substantially. Of course, this finding was expected because the increase in the share of industry increases both economic growth and energy consumption. The results of this research further showed that the price of energy has worsened the decoupling. On the other hand, technology has expectedly improved the decoupling. Finally, it was shown that urbanization improves the decoupling. Despite these results, the individual and simultaneous effects of these variables do not change the decoupling interval. Regarding the decoupling of economic growth from pollution (carbon dioxide), the coefficients of the selected models (2, 4 and 6) were 0.318560, 0.109514 and 0.213233, respectively, which indicate a weak decoupling. The coefficients of the multiplicative variables of economic globalization and political globalization were -0.046588 and -0.022803, respectively. Based on these estimates, economic and political dimensions of globalization have improved the decoupling of economic growth from pollution. On the other hand, the coefficient of the multiplicative variable of social globalization was 0.003401, based on which, social globalization has led to the worsening of the decoupling of economic growth from pollution. Also, the coefficients of the multiplicative variable of economic structure (industry share) in the selected models showed that industrialization has worsened the decoupling. Moreover, the multiplicative variable coefficients of energy price in the selected models showed that the increase in the energy price has worsened the decoupling. The coefficients of the multiplicative variable of technology in the selected models, however, suggested that technology improves the decoupling of economic growth from pollution. Finally, according to the results, urbanization has worsened the decoupling of economic growth from pollution. In general, the individual and simultaneous effects of the variables have not caused a serious change in the final interval of decoupling of economic growth from pollution. Wald test was used to check whether the coefficients of the globalization dimensions were significantly different. The results of this test indicated a statistical difference between the coefficients of globalization dimensions and the effect of globalization dimensions on decoupling. Conclusions and policy implications: The results of the present research show that the economic, social and political dimensions of globalization improve the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption. According to the results, economic globalization has a greater impact than the other two components of globalization. This can be due to the greater importance of economic fundamentals than social and political variables. Moreover, the economic and political dimensions of globalization improve the decoupling of economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions, but social globalization worsens this decoupling. It is shown that, compared to political globalization, economic globalization has a greater impact on the decoupling of economic growth and pollution, which is due to the dominance of the economic process in globalization. As another finding, technology improves the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption and pollution. Also, urbanization improves the decoupling of economic growth from energy consumption, but it worsens the decoupling of economic growth from pollution. The main recommendation of the current research is that countries should pay attention to both internal border issues and international interactions in order to control energy consumption, preserve the environment, and reduce pollution. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Decoupling, Energy Consumption, Globalization, Selected countries, Generalized Method of Moments | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acheampong, A. O., Boateng, E., Amponsah, M., & Dzator, J. (2021). Revisiting the economic growth–energy consumption nexus: does globalization matter?. Energy Economics, 102, 105472. Adams, S., & Kaffo Fotio, H. (2024). Economic integration and environmental quality: accounting for the roles of financial development, industrialization, urbanization and renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(3), 688-713. Ahmed, K., Bhattacharya, M., Shaikh, Z., Ramzan, M., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Emission intensive growth and trade in the era of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) integration: An empirical investigation from ASEAN-8. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 530-540. Ahmad, A., Zhao, Y., Shahbaz, M., Bano, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2016). Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy. Energy policy, 96, 131-143. Alam, M. S., Paramati, S. R., Shahbaz, M., & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). Natural gas, trade and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from the top gas consumers of the developing world. Applied Economics, 49(7), 635-649. Aliyu, M. A. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Pollution Haven Hypothesis Revisited. 8th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Purdue University, Germany, 1-41. Alvarado, R., Iñiguez, M., & Ponce, P. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Latin America. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 176-187. Anwar, S., & Nguyen, L. P. (2010). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2), 183-202. Arshad, A., Zakaria, M., & Junyang, X. (2016). Energy prices and economic growth in Pakistan: A macro-econometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 25-33. Awad, A. (2019). Does economic integration damage or benefit the environment? Africa's experience. Energy Policy, 132, 991-999. Batalla-Bejerano, J., Paniagua, J., & Trujillo-Baute, E. (2019). Energy market integration and electricity trade. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 8(2), 53-68. Bildirici, M., & Gokmenoglu, S. M. (2020). The impact of terrorism and FDI on environmental pollution: evidence from Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Syria, Somalia, Thailand and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106340. Brown, S., Tauler, R., & Walczak, B. (Eds.). (2020). Comprehensive chemometrics: chemical and biochemical data analysis. Elsevier. Clausen, L. T., & Rudolph, D. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches. Energy Policy, 138, 111289. Cole, M. A. (2006). Does trade liberalization increase national energy use?. Economics Letters, 92(1), 108-112. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence. Princeton University press. Cox, E. (2018). Assessing long-term energy security: The case of electricity in the United Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2287-2299. Danish, Saud, S., Baloch, M. A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2018). The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 18651-18661. Darvishi, B., Moridian, A., Motalebi, M., & Havasbeigi, F. ( 2021). Globalization, Energy Consumption and Environmental Degradation in Iran: Empirical Evidence from the Maki Cointegration Test. The Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development), 21(2), 59-82 (In Persian) Destek, M. A. (2018). Financial development and energy consumption nexus in emerging economies. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13(1), 76-81. Destek, M. A. (2020). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 33601-33614. Donou-Adonsou, F., & Lim, S. (2018). On the importance of Chinese investment in Africa. Review of Development Finance, 8(1), 63-73. Duanmu, J. L., Bu, M., & Pittman, R. (2018). Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(11), 3006-3030. Efremov, V. S., & Vladimirova, I. G. (2019). Globalization of the world economy: features of the current stage. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 27-36. Ertugrul, H. M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., & Dogan, E. (2016). The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 543-555. Frankel, J. A. (2008). Global environmental policy and global trade policy. HKS Working Paper. Harvard University. Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. Seventh edition. New Jersey: Pearson Hall. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. Ha, N. M., Ngoc, B. H., & Mcaleer, M. (2020). Financial integration, energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Annals of Financial Economics, 15(03), 2050010. Heckscher, E. F. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income. In Readings in the Theory of International Trade (PP. 272-300). Blakiston. Huang, Z., Zhang, H., & Duan, H. (2019). Nonlinear globalization threshold effect of energy intensity convergence in Belt and Road countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117750. Huang, Z., Zhang, H., & Duan, H. (2020). How will globalization contribute to reduce energy consumption?. Energy, 213, 118825. Ibrahiem, D. M., & Hanafy, S. A. (2020). Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1549-1568. Isaksson, A. S., & Kotsadam, A. (2018). Chinese aid and local corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 159, 146-159. khan, M. K., Teng, J. Z., khan, M. I., & Khan, M. O. (2019). Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 688, 424-436. Khobai, H., Abel, S., & Le Roux, P. (2021). A review of the nexus between energy consumption and economic growth in the Brics countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(3), 424-431. Lan, J., Kakinaka, M., & Huang, X. (2012). Foreign direct investment, human capital and environmental pollution in China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51, 255-275. Levinson, A. (2009). Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. American Economic Review, 99(5), 2177-2192. Li, M., Du, W., & Tang, S. (2021). Assessing the impact of environmental regulation and environmental co-governance on pollution transfer: Micro-evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106467. Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108, 271-280. Mansoorabadi S., khodaparast shirazi J., Zare H., & Ebrahimi M. (2022). The effect of globalization on energy consumption in developing country: Accurate quantitative regression. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 18 (75):145-172. (In Persian) Marques, L. M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Marques, A. C. (2017). Augmented energy-growth nexus: Economic, political and social globalization impacts. Energy Procedia, 136, 97-101. Megbowon, E., Mlambo, C., & Adekunle, B. (2019). Impact of china’s outward fdi on sub-saharan africa’s industrialization: Evidence from 26 countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1681054. Mishkin, F. S. (2009). Globalization and financial development. Journal of Development Economics, 89(2), 164-169. Muhammad, B., & Khan, M. K. (2021). Foreign direct investment inflow, economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, and carbon dioxide emission around the world. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 55643-55654. Nademi, Y., & Dalvandi, M. (2023). The role of globalization in the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth. Green Development Management Studies, 2(1), 20-35. doi: 10.22077/jgmd.2023.6191.1025. (In Persian) Nain, M. Z., Ahmad, W., & Kamaiah, B. (2017). Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in India: a disaggregated causal analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 36(8), 807-824. Ohlin, B. G. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press. Paramati, S. R., Shahzad, U., & Doğan, B. (2022). The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111735. Rahman, H. U., Zaman, U., & Górecki, J. (2021). The role of energy consumption, economic growth and globalization in environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from the brics region. Sustainability, 13(4), 1924. Rasekhi, S., & Ghanbartabar, S. (2023). Decoupling Dynamism of Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Pollution in Iran: New Evidence from Factor Analysis at Triple Levels of Energy. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 28(97), 6-43. doi: 10.22054/ijer.2024.76778.1233. (In Persian) Rasekhi, S., & Ghanbartabar, S. (2024). Energy security and the hypothesis of decoupling: A case study of Russia-Ukraine war. Journal of Countries Studies, 2(1), 91-115. doi: 10.22059/jcountst.2023.367548.1073. (In Persian) Rasekhi, S., Ghanbartabar Ahmadi, S., Mehnatfar, Y. (2023) Threshold effect of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic welfare in selected countries with different energy intensities. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 11 (42): 55-89. (In Persian) Sadorsky, P. (2011). Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics, 33(5), 739-749. Sadorsky, P. (2012). Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Economics, 34(2), 476-488. Santiago, R., Fuinhas, J. A., & Marques, A. C. (2020). The impact of globalization and economic freedom on economic growth: the case of the Latin America and Caribbean countries. Economic Change and Restructuring, 53(1), 61-85. Shah, K. U., Arjoon, S., & Rambocas, M. (2016). Aligning corporate social responsibility with green economy development pathways in developing countries. Sustainable Development, 24(4), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1625 Shahbaz, M., Haouas, I., & Van Hoang, T. H. (2019). Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture?. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 197-218. Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Sadorsky, P. (2016). The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics, 55, 52-68. Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India?. Ecological Indicators, 52, 379-393. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 165-173. Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., & Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries?. Energy Economics, 51, 275-287. Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221-232. Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Mahalik, M. K., & Sadorsky, P. (2018). How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis. Applied Economics, 50(13), 1479-1494. Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Erkut, B., & Mundi, H. S. (2021). Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: Evidence from panel estimations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146(C). Song, W., Huang, J., Zhong, M., & Wen, F. (2019). The impacts of nonferrous metal price shocks on the macro-economy in China from the perspective of resource security. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 688-699. Su, H., & Liang, B. (2021). The impact of regional market integration and economic opening up on environmental total factor energy productivity in Chinese provinces. Energy Policy, 148, 111943. Wang, M., & Feng, C. (2019). Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China's metal industrial sectors: A technological and efficiency perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 691, 1173-1181. Wang, S., Gao, S., Li, S., & Feng, K. (2020). Strategizing the relation between urbanization and air pollution: Empirical evidence from global countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118615. Wang, H., Hashimoto, S., Yue, Q., Moriguchi, Y., & Lu, Z. (2013). Decoupling analysis of four selected countries: China, Russia, Japan, and the United States during 2000–2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(4), 618-629. Xie, Q., Wang, X., & Cong, X. (2020). How does foreign direct investment affect CO2 emissions in emerging countries? New findings from a nonlinear panel analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119422. Xu, Z., Baloch, M. A., Danish, Meng, F., Zhang, J., & Mahmood, Z. (2018). Nexus between financial development and CO 2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 28378-28390. Xu, H., Pan, X., Guo, S., & Lu, Y. (2021b). Forecasting Chinese CO2 emission using a non-linear multi-agent intertemporal optimization model and scenario analysis. Energy, 228, 120514. Xu, H., Pan, X., Lu, Y., & Pu, C. (2021a). Evaluation of consumption preference in China under environmental regulation policies: Scenario analysis based on a DECGE model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107441. Xia, W., Apergis, N., Bashir, M. F., Ghosh, S., Doğan, B., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Investigating the role of globalization, and energy consumption for environmental externalities: empirical evidence from developed and developing economies. Renewable Energy, 183, 219-228. Yu, Y., Chen, D., Zhu, B., & Hu, S. (2013). Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978–2010: Decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecological Indicators, 24, 177-184. Zhang, Y., Nie, R., Shi, R., & Zhang, M. (2018). Measuring the capacity utilization of the coal sector and its decoupling with economic growth in China’s supply-side reform. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 314-325. Zhang, D., Shi, X., & Sheng, Y. (2015). Comprehensive measurement of energy market integration in East Asia: An application of dynamic principal component analysis. Energy Economics, 52, 299-305. Zhu, B. Z., Jiang, M. X., Zhang, S. F., & Jin, L. (2019). Resource and Environment Economic Complex System: Models and Applications. Science Press: Beijing, China. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 679 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 287 |
||