ارزش‌های مکان تاریخی در نگرش فرد دلبسته به مکان؛ نمونه موردی: مسجد فرط یزد | ||
| معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک | ||
| دوره 11، شماره 18، اردیبهشت 1403، صفحه 187-201 اصل مقاله (848.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/ahdc.2024.21516.1799 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| محمود پورسراجیان* | ||
| استادیار دانشکده هنر و معماری دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| حفاظت مکان‌های تاریخی مستلزم شناخت ارزش‌های آن‌ها به‌عنوان بخش اصلی انگیزه این تعهد می‌باشد. در حال حاضر، این انگیزه و تعهد، کارشناسانه و از پیش‌تعیین‌شده پنداشته شده است و تعهد در آن، از نوع روان‌شناختی وابستگی به مکان است. این نوع تعهد بدون دخالت تجربی انسان بر اساس ارزش‌های قراردادی مکان‌محور شکل می‌گیرد. از سوی دیگر، تعهد از نوع روان‌شناختی دلبستگی به مکان است که از مسیر عاطفی و تجربه همزمان فرد، او را متعهد به حفاظت مکان تاریخی می‌کند. بر این اساس، مقاله با رویکرد کیفی، راهبرد نمونه‌موردی، روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی هدایت‌شده و شیوه مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته از نمونه هدفمند افراد دلبسته به مسجد فرط یزد، درصدد توصیف ارزشمندی یک مکان تاریخی از نگرش افراد دلبسته به مکان تاریخی، به‌عنوان انگیزه تعهد آن‌ها نسبت به حفاظت یک مکان تاریخی و تبیین تفاوت آن با نگرش افراد وابسته به مکان می‌باشد. انتخاب مصاحبه‌شوندگان از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند متوالی و با روش «نمونه‌گیری نظری» صورت گرفته است. یافته‌ها تفاوت‌های اساسی را بین ارزش‌های مکان تاریخی در نگرش فرد وابسته و دلبسته از لحاظ فرایند ارزشگذاری و تشخیص و نوع و اولویت ارزش‌ها نشان می‌دهد. منشأ اصلی این تفاوت‌ها در اصل، به‌صفر رسیدن زمان در نگرش فرد وابسته و در مقابل، حضور زمان در شکل تجربه همزمان فرد دلبسته و ارزشگذاری مکان تاریخی در نگرش او است. به‌گونه‌ای که فرد وابسته، ارزشمندی مکان تاریخی را مبتنی بر ارزش‌های مکان‌محور و نیازمحور به‌صورت قراردادی و با اولویت ارزش روز تعریف می‌کند؛ در صورتی که فرد دلبسته ارزشمندی مکان تاریخی را در تجربه همزمان خود و مبتنی بر عواطف انسان و تعاملات او با انسان‌های دیگر و مکان تعریف می‌کند و اولویت را به تعاملات اجتماعی و گره‌های عاطفی می‌دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزش‌های مکان تاریخی؛ دلبستگی به مکان؛ وابستگی به مکان؛ نیاز و عاطفه؛ انگیزه حفاظت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The values of the historical place in the attitude of the person attached to the place; Case study: Fort Mosque in Yazd | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahmoud Poursarrajian | ||
| Assistant professor, Department of Architecture, Art and Architecture School, Yazd University, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The protection of historical places requires the recognition of their values as the main part of the motivation for this commitment. Currently, this motivation and commitment is considered expert and predetermined, and the commitment in it is of the psychological type of place dependence. This type of commitment is formed without human experiential intervention based on location-oriented contractual values. On the other hand, commitment is a psychological type of attachment to a place, which commits him to the protection of a historical place from the emotional path and simultaneous experience of a person. Based on this, the article with a qualitative approach, a case study strategy, a guided qualitative content analysis method, and a semi-structured interview method from a targeted sample of people attached to the Farat Mosque in Yazd, aims to describe the value of a historical place from the attitude of people attached to the historical place, as a motivation for their commitment. Regarding the protection of a historical place and explaining its difference with the attitude of people depending on the place. The selection of the interviewees has been done through sequential targeted sampling and the "theoretical sampling" method. The findings show the fundamental differences between the values of the historical place in the attitude of the dependent and attached person in terms of the process of valuation and recognition and the type and priority of the values. The main source of these differences is the zeroing of time in the dependent person's attitude and, on the other hand, the presence of time in the form of simultaneous experience of the attached person and the valuing of the historical place in his attitude. In such a way that the dependent person defines the value of the historical place based on location-oriented and needs-oriented values in a contractual manner and with the priority of today's value; If the attached person defines the value of the historical place in his simultaneous experience and based on human emotions and his interactions with other people and the place, and gives priority to social interactions and emotional knots. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| values of historical place, place attachment, place dependence, need and emotion, motivation of conservation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
براندی، چزاره (1391). نظریه‌های مرمت. ترجمه پیروز حناچی. چاپ سوم. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
رحیم‌زاده، محمدرضا و نجفی، مهنام (1389). جایگاه درک ارزش‌های ماهوی اثر تاریخی در روند احیاء. در مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش شناخت و معرفی مزیت‌ها و ظرفیت‌های احیاء و بهره‌برداری از اماکن تاریخی و فرهنگی. سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صندوق احیاء و بهره‌برداری از بناها و اماکن تاریخی و فرهنگی.
طراز یزدی، عبدالوهاب بن عبدالکریم (1341). کتابچه شرح موقوفات یزد. به کوشش ایرج افشار. تهران: فرهنگ ایران زمین.
کاتب، احمدبن‌علی (1357). تاریخ جدید یزد. به کوشش ایرج افشار. تهران: امیرکبیر.
گ‍ی‍دن‍ز، آن‍ت‍ون‍ی (1391). ت‍ج‍دد و ت‍ش‍خ‍ص: ج‍ام‍ع‍ه و ه‍وی‍ت ش‍خ‍ص‍ی در ع‍ص‍ر جدید. ترجمه ناصر موفقیان. چاپ هشتم. تهران: نشر نی.
مستوفی بافقی، محمد مفید (1384). جامع مفیدی. جلد‌های 1 و 3. به کوشش ایرج افشار. تهران: اندیشه.
Altman, I. & Low, S.M. (1992). Place Attachment. New York: Plenum Press. Ashworth, G., Graham, B. and Tunbridge, J. (2007). Pluralising Pasts: heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London: Pluto. Banning, E.B. (2002). Archaeological survey. London: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers. Brown, G. & Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and Coeterier, J.F. (2002). Lay peoples evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and urban planning, (59): 111-123. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. 6th ed. London , New York: Routledge. Cuba, L. & Hummon, D.M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification With Dwelling, Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G. & Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine 2000, 50(7-8): 1001-1014. English Heritage. (2000). Government Review of Policies Relating to the Historic Environment. Available at http://www.englishheritage.org.uk/discovery/heritagereview/ consultation/index.asp (accessed 21.3.2020). English Heritage and Commission for the Built Environment. (2008). Character and Identity: Townscape and heritage appraisals in housing market renewal area. Available at http://www.cabe.org.uk/publications/character _and_identity (accessed 21.3.2019). Feilden, B. & Jokilehto, J. (1993). Management Guidelines for world Cultural Heritage Sites. Rome: ICCROM. Francaviglia, R.V. (1978). Xenia Rebuilds: Effects of Predisaster Conditioning on Fullilove, M.Th. (1996). Psychiatric implications of displacement: contributions from the psycology of place. The American Journal of Psychiatry, (153): 1516-1523. Graham, B., Ashworth, G.J. and Tunbridge, J.E. (2000). A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. London: Arnold. Grenville, J. and Fairclough, G. (2004-5). Characterisation: Introduction. Conservation Bulletin, 47(Winter): 2-3. Forgan, L. (2008). Britishness– a values based approach is not enough. Available at http://www. thersa. org/ data/ assets/ pdffile/ 0019/ 120394/ Transcript-Dame-Liz-Forgan.pdf. Hay, R. (1998). A Rooted Sense of Place in Cross-cultural Perspective. The Canadian Hambleton, R. (2017). Place in Public Policy: Place-making, Place-shaping and Place-marketing. Presentation to the International Centre for Local and Regional Development Conference on Our Future in Place, Sligo, Ireland, 9 February 2017. Hidalgo, M.C. & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3): 273-281. Hirshleifer, J. & Riley, J.G. (2002). The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. New York: Routledge. Hou, J.S., Lin, C.H. & Morais, D.B. (2005). Antecedents of Attachment to a Cultural Tourism Destination: The Case of Hakka and Non-Hakka Taiwanese Visitors to Pei-Pu, Taiwan. Journal of Travel Research, 44(2): 221-233. Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288. Jorgensen, B. & Stedman, R. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of Predictors of Sense of Place Dimensions: Attachment to, Dependence on, and Identification with Lakeshore Properties. Journal of Environmental Management, (79): 316-327. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). Experience of Nature. New York: Cambridge. Kelly, G. & Hosking, K. (2008). Nonpermanent Residents, Place Attachment, and “Sea Change” Communities. Environment and Behavior, 40(4): 575-594. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 35-51. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3): 207-30. Low, S.M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: place attachment in the plaza. In Place attachment. Edited by Altman, I. & Low, S.M. New York : Plenum Press. Nasar, J.L. (1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Nasar, J.L. (1999). Design by Competition: Making Design Competitions Work. New York: Cambridge. Nasar. J.L. (2011). Environmental Psychology and Urban Design. In companion to urban design. Edited by Banerjee, T. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Abingdon: Routledge. Pretty, G., Chipuer, H. & Bramston, P. (2003). Sense of Place amongst Adolescents and Adults in Two Rural Australian Towns: The Discriminating Features of Place Attachment, Sense of Community and Place Dependence in Relation to Place Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (23): 273-287. Proshansky, H., Fabian, A. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1): 57-83. Purcell, A.T. & Nasar, J.L. (1992). Experiencing other people's houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3): 199–211. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion. Riger, S. & Lavrakas, P.J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment & social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1): 55-66. Roberts, S., Emerick, K., Drake, A., Willis-Brown, B., Cullen, P., Condy, K., Burke, P., Sell, J. & Clarke, K. (2007). Communities and Heritage. Conservation Bulletin, (55): 4-15. Sandell, R. (2007). Museums, Prejudice and the Reframing of Difference. New York: Routledge. Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 1-10. Schreyer, R., Jacob, G. & White, R. (1981). Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behavior in recreation. In Proceedings of the applied geography conferences, (4): 294-300. Sharpe, E.K. & Ewert, A.W. (1999). Interferences in place attachment: implications for wilderness. paper presented to Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference, Missoula, Montana. Simakole, B.M., Farrelly, T.A. & Holland, J. (2019). Provisions for community participation in heritage management: case of the Zambezi Source National Monument, Zambia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(3): 225-238. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge. Stamps, A. (2000). Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment. Boston: Kluwser Academic. Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place. Boston: CBI Publishing Co. Stokols, D. & Shumaker, S.A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings, Cognition, social behavior and the environment. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Tuan, Y.F. (1974). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice - Hall Inc. van der Graaf, P. (2009). Out of place? Emotional ties to the neighbourhood in urban renewal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA -Amsterdam University Press. Veal, A.J. (2011). Research methods for leisure & tourism: a practical guide. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 208 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 182 |
||