بررسی آثار نرخ سود واقعی صفر بر اقتصاد ایران در قالب مدلهای تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 32، مهر 1403، صفحه 336-371 اصل مقاله (673.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2024.21339.2572 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی نظری* ؛ سیدهادی عربی؛ امیدعلی عادلی؛ یزدان گودرزی فراهانی | ||
| دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی آثار سیاست پولی نرخ سود واقعی صفر بر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی است. بدین منظور در این پژوهش یک الگوی تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی شامل شبکه بانکی طراحی شده است که در آن بانک مرکزی با استفاده از ابزار عملیات بازار باز، نرخ سود سیاستی را در بازار تعیین کرده و از این طریق سیاست پولی خود را اجرا میکند. با استفاده از دادههای فصلی دوره زمانی 1400 – 1388 و روش بیزین، نتایج برآورد پارامترهای ساختاری الگو نشان میدهد که سیاست پولی در ایران حالت انفعالی داشته و نمیتواند در پاسخ به شوکهای اقتصادی واکنش متناسب داشته باشد و لذا تعادلهای اقتصادی بیثبات در اقتصاد کشور قابل مشاهده است. همچنین به منظور بررسی آثار نرخ سود واقعی صفر، از شبیهسازی تصادفی استفاده شده است که نتایج نشان میدهد اگرچه این سیاست دارای آثار قابل انتظار بر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی است اما این قاعده نیز نمیتواند واکنش کافی در متغیرها جهت برقراری مجدد تعادل باثبات ایجاد کند. دلالت های این پژوهش در راستای مباحث مرتبط با جبران کاهش ارزش پول آن است که به منظور رسیدن به تعادل با ثبات نیاز است قاعده نرخ سود واقعی صفر مورد بازبینی قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نرخ سود صفر؛ سیاست پولی؛ بانکداری بدون ربا؛ تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Estimating DSGE Model with Zero Real Interest Rate Policy on Iran's Economy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Nazari؛ Seyed Hadi Arabi؛ Omidali Adeli؛ Yazdan Gudarzi Farahani | ||
| Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: The Central Bank, as the organ in charge of monetary policies, implements those policies that achieve the selected final goals. In order to achieve these goals, central banks usually use a mechanism. In the first step, the operational tool is selected, and, in the second step, this tool has an effect on a variable called the intermediate goal. Then, through its changes, the final goals are achieved. Depending on the economic conditions and environmental characteristics, the selected tools of the central bank can have different degrees of effectiveness in achieving the macroeconomic goals. Since the monetary policy used in Iran's economy is based on the prohibition of usury and the non-use of interest rates, the question to arise is how the restriction of zero interest rate (prohibition of usury) is applied in the Islamic economic system. Although we know that the theory of zero interest rate, which is discussed in conventional economics, has structural (theoretical and practical) differences with the concept of prohibition of usury, it can have implications for the Islamic economy and our country. In this regard, the issue of compensation for currency depreciation has always been the focus of Islamic economic researchers. For example, compensation for the depreciation of money up to the inflation is accepted according to the fatwa of the Supreme Leader of Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the economic effects of the zero real interest rate policy on the variables of Iran’s macroeconomics and analyze its consequences. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of zero real interest rate monetary policy on macroeconomic variables. Methodology: In this research, a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) including the banking system has been designed, in which the central bank determines the policy interest rate in the market by using the open market operation tools and implements its monetary policy. In the conventional structure of DSGE models, it is necessary to determine the parts of the model at first. In this study, the described parts are household, banking system, producer of final goods and services, government and the central bank as the determiner of interest rates. The study also uses the seasonal data of the period 2009-2021 with the Bayesian method. Findings and discussion: The findings of this research show that, based on the defined monetary policy rule, the interest rate reacts to changes in the inflation rate and production. According to the findings, the reaction of macroeconomic variables to the shock of one percentage increase in the nominal interest rate is as expected. With the increase in the interest rate, household consumption decreases. Based on the optimal path of the investment expenses, the investment costs and, consequently, the amount of the capital decrease. As the marginal cost items decrease, the total production level decreases too. Therefore, based on zero real interest rate, the direction and path of change of important macroeconomic variables in the policy is in line with expectations. The effects of the zero real interest rate policy show themselves better when compared to those of the non-zero real interest rate policy. The rule based on zero real interest rate is less able to control economic fluctuations because, in the case where the monetary policy maker actively reacts to economic fluctuations (non-zero real interest rate policy), its response to the inflation rate is not point-for-point. So, it can control economic fluctuations by changing the real interest rate. In the case where the interest rate reacts exactly point-for-point to the inflation rate, because the real interest rate does not change, there is no noticeable change in the path of macroeconomic variables; therefore, in the face of economic shocks, stable equilibrium will not be established. In fact, the zero real interest rate, meaning the equality of the nominal interest rate and the inflation rate, violates Taylor's principle in monetary policy. According to Taylor's principle, the policy based on the interest rate rule can lead to a sufficient response to the variables, thus reestablishing the balance if the sensitivity of the interest rate to the inflation rate is greater than point-for-point. If this sensitivity is equal to one, it cannot bring the stable equilibrium conditions for the economy. Conclusions and policy implications: As it was said, in the current situation of the country, the implemented interest rate indicates the passive state of the monetary policy. In other words, it shows that it cannot bring a stable balance in response to economic shocks. In the current research, it has been tried to simulate the effects of implementing the policy of zero real interest rate and analyze its effects on macroeconomic variables, considering the theories about compensation for currency depreciation and the recent fatwa of the Supreme Leader of Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as some theories based on the zero real interest rate in the conventional economy. The results of this simulation show that the mentioned policy cannot guarantee the establishment of equilibrium in the economy after the occurrence of a shock. This is because, like the current monetary policy of the central bank, this policy violates Taylor's principle. Therefore, in line with the mentioned fatwa on compensating the depreciation of the currency up to the inflation rate and in order to correct this policy rule, some variables can be considered to achieve a stable balance. These variables are such as the population growth rate, economic uncertainties, political subsidies, etc., which can be the subject of future research. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Zero Interest Rate, Monetary Policy, Interest-Free Banking, Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allais, M. (1947). Economie ET Interet. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. First Edition. Amirault, D. & O`Reilly, B. (2001). The Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates: How Important Is It? Staff Working Papers 01-6, Bank of Canada. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.34989/swp-2001-6] Aspromourgos, T. (2011). Can (and Should) Monetary Policy Pursue a Zero Real Interest Rate, Permanently? Metroeconomica International Review of Economics, 62(4), 635-655. [DOI: j.1467-999X.2011.04133.x] Bakhshi Dastjerdi, R., & Mahmoudinia, D. (2013). Theoretical and Empirical Study of Natural Rate of Interest: Conventional and Contrastive Points of View on the Iranian Economy during 1352-87. The Journal of Economic Policy, 5(9), 169-197. (In Persian) Bakhshi Dastjerdi, R. (2010). A Comparative Study of the Theory of Zero Interest Rate with the Theory of Riba Ban in Islam. Journal of Islamic Economics, 10(38), 61-80. (In Persian) Baytas, A. & Alvin L. Marty. (1989). The Interest Elasticity of Money Demand: Further Evidence. Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, 15(2), 107-111. Bernanke, B. & Mark Gertler, (1999). Monetary policy and Asset Price Volatility. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 84(Q IV), 17-51. Boschen, F. & O-Mills, L. (1988). Tests of the Relation Between Money and Output in the Real Business Cycle Model. Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 22(3), 355-374. Calvo, A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383–398. Chen, H. (2014). Assessing the Effects of the Zero-Interest-Rate Policy Through the Lens of a Regime-Switching DSGE Model. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2014-38, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.). Cho, D. & Kim, H. & Kim, S. (2023). The Paradox of Price Flexibility in an Open Economy. Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, 51, 370-392. Curdia, V., Ferrero, A., Cee Ng, G. & Tambalotti A. (2011). Evaluating Interest Rate Rules in an Estimated DSGE Models. Staff Reports 510, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. David-Pur, L. & Galil, K. & Rosenboim, M. (2020). To Decrease or not to Decrease: The Impact of Zero and Negative Interest Rates on Investment Decisions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, 87(C). [DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101571] Debelle, G. (1997). Inflation Targeting in Practice. IMF Working Paper No. 1997/035, International Monetary Fund. Dixit, A. K. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308. Friedman, M. (1969). Round Table on Exchange Rate Policy. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 59(2), 364-366. Fuhrer, J. (2000). Habit Formation in Consumption and its Implications for Monetary Policy Models. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 90(3), 367-390. Gali, J. (2008). Monetary Policy, Inflation and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework. Journal of Economics, 95(2), 179-181. [DOI:10.1007/s00712-008-0040-0] Gavin, W. T. (2018). Monetary Policy Regimes and the Real Interest Rate. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 100(2), 151-169. [DOI: 10.20955/r.2018.151-69] Ireland, P. (2005). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism. Boston College Working Papers in Economics No. 628, Boston College Department of Economics. Jung, A (2018). Does Mccallum’s Rule Outperform Taylor’s Rule During the Financial Crisis? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, 69(C), 9-21. Kanour, R., Alavi Rad, A., Akbari Moghadam, B. & Mirzapour Babajan, A. (2019). The rule of optimal monetary policy based on heterogeneity of expectations of economic agents in the form of agent based model. The Journal of Economic Policy, 11(22), 1-32. (In Persian) [DOI: 10.22034/epj.2020.9797.1774] Khamenei, S. A. (2014). Educational Treatise; Transaction Rules Vol (2). Tehran: Islamic Revoloution, 344. (In Persian) Kulish, M., Morley, J. & Robinson, T. (2017). Estimating DSGE Models with Zero Interest Rate Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88(C), 35-49. Leeper, M. (1991). Equilibria Under Active and Passive Monetary and Fiscal Policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 27(1), 129-147. Lerner, A. (1959). Consumption-Loan Interest and Money. Journal of Political Economy, 67(5). McCallum, B. (1987). Inflation: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Papers 2312, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. McCallum, B. (1984). Monetarist Rules in the Light of Recent Experience. NBER Working Papers 1277, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Mishkin, F. (2021). The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 13th edition, Pearson. Naghdi, Y. & Efati Baran, F. (2019). Determining the Optimal Interest Rate and its Effects on Iran's Economy: An Application of Optimal Control Theories. Journal of Economic Modeling, 13(45), 73-92. (In Persian) Porter, D. & Simpson, T. & Mauskopf, E. (1979). Financial Innovation and the Monetary Aggregates. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 213-229. Samuelson, P. (1958). an Exact Consumption Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money. Journal of Political Economy, 66. Smets F. & Wouters R. (2003). An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(5), 1123-1175. Svensson, L. (2003). What Is Wrong with Taylor Rules? Using Judgment in Monetary Policy through Targeting Rules. Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 41(2), 426-477. Taylor, J. (1993). Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Elsevier, 39(1), 195-214. Ulate, M. (2021). Going Negative at the Zero Lower Bound: The Effects of Negative Nominal Interest Rates. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 111(1), 1-40. Walsh, C. (2010). Monetary Theory and Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 3rd edition. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 630 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 420 |
||