اثر باز بودن تجاری-مالی و سرمایه انسانی بر حمایت از سرمایه گذاران خرد در کشورهای در حال توسعه | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 32، مهر 1403، صفحه 208-234 اصل مقاله (472.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2024.20808.2521 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سمیه صادقی* | ||
| استادیار اقتصاد، گروه مدیریت مالی، واحد آیتالله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بخش تولید مستلزم سرمایهگذاری مالی و فناوری بالاست. یکی از راههایی که میتواند به تعمیق و افزایش نقش بازار سرمایه در تأمین مالی منجر شود و جذابیت بیشتری برای ورود سرمایهگذاران داخلی و خارجی فراهم آورد، سیاستگذاری و اتخاذ رویههایی برای حمایت بیشتر از حقوق سرمایهگذاران خرد است. از سوی دیگر، روند فزاینده جهانیسازی و رقابت بینالمللی، هر چند مزایایی برای شرکتهای محلی دارد و میتواند باعث افزایش سرمایه و نقدینگی بازار گردد، اما آیا سیستمهای حاکمیت شرکتی محلی تحت تاثیر مقیاس جهانیسازی و رقابت خارجی قرار دارند؟ هدف این مقاله ، بررسی تاثیر درجه باز بودن اقتصادی (مالی و تجاری) و سرمایه انسانی بر شاخص حمایت از سرمایهگذاران خرد در کشورهای در حال توسعه با استفاده از روش پانل پویای GMM طی دوره 2021-2014 است. نتایج نشان داد گسترش روابط تجاری و همچنین تسهیل ورود و خروج سرمایه به انطباق بیشتر استانداردهای حمایت از سرمایهگذاران خرد در کشورهای در حال توسعه کمک میکند، هر چند اثر بازبودن تجاری نسبت به اثر تسهیل ورود و خروج سرمایه قویتر است. در این میان، نقش سرمایه انسانی (سرمایهگذاری در نیروی انسانی) در انتقال اثرات سرریز انکارناپذیر است. به عبارت دیگر، میتوان گفت ارتقای استانداردهای حاکمیت شرکتی و حمایت از سرمایهگذاران خرد در کشورهای در حال توسعه تحت تاثیر مقیاس جهانیسازی و رقابت بینالمللی قرار دارند و سرمایه انسانی به جهت انتقال دانش و شوکهای بهرهوری اهمیت دارد. علاوه بر آن، توسعه بازار سرمایه در کشورهای در حال توسعه نیز بهطور معناداری مساله نمایندگی بین مدیران و سرمایهگذاران خرد را کاهش میدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| درجه باز بودن اقتصاد (تجاری و مالی)؛ سرمایه انسانی؛ توسعه بازار سرمایه؛ حمایت از سرمایهگذاران خرد؛ پانل پویای گشتاورهای تعمیمیافته سیستمی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The effects of Trade and Financial Openness and Human Capital on the Protecting Micro Investors in Developing Countries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Somaye Sadeghi | ||
| Department of Financial Management, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran, | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: The production sector requires financial investment and high technology. One of the ways to deepen and increase the role of the capital market in financing and providing more attractiveness for the entry of domestic and foreign investors is policy making and adopting procedures for greater support. It is one of the rights of micro investors. Also, due to the increasing trend of globalization and international competition, it has advantages for local companies and can increase capital and market liquidity. But are local corporate governance systems affected by the scale of globalization and international competition? With the emergence of the knowledge-based economy, the issue of human capital has been considered as an important factor in creating competitive advantage and increasing the value of companies, which can affect the structure of corporate governance. For this purpose, this paper investigates the impact of economic openness (financial and trade) and human capital on the index of support for micro investors in developing countries using the panel GMM method during 2014-2021. Methodology: In order to analyze the effects of the international competition factors including the trade openness as well as the facilitation of capital inflow and outflow on protecting micro-investors index, the dynamic panel method (GMM SYS) has been used. The system estimator (GMM SYS) is actually an alternative to the GMM first-order difference estimator (GMM DIF). In this method, instrumental variables are used to eliminate endogeneity. Since it is very difficult to find a strong instrument that can cause reliable estimation, DIF and SYS estimators use the instrument available in the collection, i.e. the interval of the endogenous variable. It enters the model as the best instrument. It should be noted that there are two tests to ensure the validity of instrumental variables in GMM-based methods. The first is Sargan's test. In this test, the null hypothesis indicates the non-correlation of the means with the residue. Therefore, rejecting the null hypothesis confirms the validity of the results. Second, the correlation test of the residuals is AR(1) in the first order and AR(2) in the second order. In this test, the disturbance sentences should have first-order serial correlation AR(1) and not second-order serial correlation AR(2). Findings and discussion: The results showed that the expansion of trade relations as well as facilitating the entry and exit of capital helps to comply more with the standards of protection of micro-investors in developing countries, although the effect of trade openness is stronger. Meanwhile, the role of human capital (investment in human resources) in transferring spillover effects is undeniable. In other words, it can be said that improving corporate governance standards and supporting micro-investors in developing countries are affected by the scale of globalization and international competition (trade and financial), and human capital is important for knowledge transfer and productivity shocks. In addition, the development of the capital market in developing countries significantly reduces the representation problem between managers and micro-investors. Conclusions and policy implications: Acording to the results, the expansion of trade relations and the facilitation of capital entry and exit have made developing countries more attractive for foreign investors. Thus, domestic companies, to compete with foreign companies, would be motivated towards promotion of corporate governance standards and micro-investor protection. That means, local corporate governance systems are affected by the scale of globalization and international competition. It is noteworthy that exposure to international competition, although it has benefits for local companies and improves corporate governance standards, may create challenges for developing countries that must be addressed through frameworks. In such cases, strong supervision should be done. By facilitating the entry and exit of capital and the expansion of trade relationships, managers may prioritize short-term benefits over long-term sustainability. On the other hand, weak regulatory mechanisms in developing countries may make them unable to keep pace with the complexities of international markets, allowing companies to misbehave and reduce the quality of governance. Examining these challenges can be done in future research. Also, the role of human capital quality (investment in human resources) in transferring the spillover effects of corporate governance and as a moderating factor for the alignment of interests between managers and micro-investors is undeniable, which confirms the strategic policies of human resource management. In addition, governments should improve the stock market environment with strong institutional infrastructure in order to protect micro-investors and, thus, increase the confidence of foreign investors and provide incentives to increase cross-border investments in the host economies. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Economic Openness (Trade and financial), Human Capital, Capital Market, protecting micro investors, Panel GMM SYS | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Bakar, N. A., & Raji, J. O. (2017). Trade Openness, Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth: The Case of Pakistan and India. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(3), 229-246. Agyei, S.K., Obuobi, N.K., Isshaq, M. Z., Abeka, M.J. , Gatsi, J.G. , Boateng, E., & Amoah, E.K. (2022). Country-Level Corporate Governance and Foreign Portfolio Investments in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Moderating Role of Institutional Quality. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1-23. Agyemang, O.S., Gbettey, C., Gatsi, J. G. & Acquah, S. K. (2019). Country-Level Corporate Governance and Foreign Direct Investment in Africa, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(5), 1133-1152. Ahmadi, A.M. & Hozar Moghadam, N. (2013). Impact of Trade Liberalization on HDI in Developed Country. Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 4(11), 109-134. (In Persian). Alsubaie, A. N. (2012, December). The Influence of Foreign Direct Investment on Corporate-Governance Practices: A Conceptual Framework. International Conference on Arts, Economics and Literature (ICAEL), Singapore, 14-15. Ananchotikul, N. (2008). Does Foreign Direct Investment Really Improve Corporate Governance? Evidence from Thailand. Working Papers No. 2008-09: Monetary Policy Group, Bank of Thailand. Appiah-Kubi, S.N.K.; Malec, K., Mansoor, M., Kutin, S.B., Panavoka, L., Phiri, J. & Zaganjori, O. (2020). The Impact of Corporate Governance Structures on Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study of West African Countries. Sustainability, 12, 15-37. Asamoah, M. E., Adjasi, C. & Alhasan, A.L. (2016). Macroeconomic Uncertainty, Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Quality: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Systems, 40(4), 612-621. Bae, K.H., Ozoguz, A., Tan H., & Wirjanto T. (2012). Do Foreigners Facilitate Information Transmission in Emerging Markets?. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 209–227. Bandiera, O., Andrea, P., Sadun, R., & Wulf, J. M. (2014). Span of Control and Span of Attention. Working Paper No. 12-053: Harvard Business School Strategy Unit, Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 14-22. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Lundblad, C. (2011). Financial Openness and Productivity. World Development, 39(1), 1-19. Borisova, G., Paul Brockman, P., Salas, M. J., & Zagorchev, A. (2012). Government Ownership and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(11), 2917-2934. Carati, G. & Tourani Rad, A. (2000), Convergence of Corporate Systems, Managerial Finance, 26(10), 66-73. Chen, Y., J. Huang, X. Li, & Q. Yuan. )2022(. Does Stock Market Liberalization Improve Stock Price Efficiency? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 49 (7-8): 1175-1210. Chung, C. Y., H. Kim, & K. Wang. (2022). Do Domestic or Foreign Institutional Investors Matter? The Case of Firm Information Asymmetry in Korea. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 72: 101727. Erdal, L., & Göçer, I. (2015). The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on R&D and Innovations: Panel Data Analysis for Developing Asian Countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 749-758. García-Castro, R., Ariño, M., Rodriguez, M., & Ayuso, S. (2008). Cross-National Study of Corporate Governance and Employment Contracts. Business Ethics, 17(3), 259-284. Han, M., Ding, A., & Zhang, S. (2022). Foreign Ownership and Earnings Management. International Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 114-133. Haque, F., Arun, T., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2008). Corporate Governance and Capital Markets: A Conceptual Framework. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(2), 264-276. Jia, N., Huang, K. G. & Zhang, C. M. (2019). Public Governance, Corporate Governance, and Firm Innovation: An Examination of State Owned Enterprise. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220-247. Kar, M., Peker, O. & Kaplan, M. (2008). Trade Liberalization, Financial Development and Economic Growth in the Long Term: The Case of Turkey. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 25-38. Lajili, K., Yu-Hsin Lin, L., & Rostamkalaei, A. (2020). Corporate Governance, Human Capital Resources, and Firm Performance: Exploring the Missing Links. Journal of General Management, 45(4). Lee, H., Staats, J.L. & Biglaiser, G. (2012). The Importance of Legal Systems for Portfolio Investment in the Developing world. International Area Studies Review, 15(4): 339-358. Lien, Y.C., Piess, J., Strange, R., & Filatotchev, I. (2005). The Role of Corporate Governance in FDI Decisions: Evidence from Taiwan, International Business Review, 14(6): 739-763. Pevcin, P. (2020). Government Size and Quality of Governance: Does State Size Matter. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 13(3): 7-14. Porta, R., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3): 1147-1170. Riley, S. M., Michael, S. C., & Mahoney, J. T. (2017). Human Capital Matters: Market Valuation of Firm Investments in Training and the Role of Complementary Assets. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1895-1914. Romero, F.T. & Araujo, F. E. (2022). The Influence of Corporate Governance Characteristics on Human Capital Disclosure: The Moderating Role of Managerial Ownership. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 324-374. Saha, S., Sadekin, N. & Saha, S.K. (2022). Effects of Institutional Quality on Foreign Direct Investment Inflow in Lower-Middle Income Countries, Heliyon, 8, 108-128. Shabbir, M. F., Xin, Y. & Hafeez, S. (2020). Corporate Governance and Firm Efficiency: an Application of Internet Companies of China, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. Taylor & Francis Journals, 56(12), 2874-2890. Su, Z. X., Wright, P. M., & Ulrich, M. D. (2018). Going Beyond the Shrm Paradigm: Examining Four Approaches to Governing Employees. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1598-1619. Tayebi, S. K., Pourshahabi, F., KhaniZadeh Amiri, M., & Kazemi, E. (2013). The Effects of the Foreign Direct Investment and Openness on the Domestic Investment and Economic Growth: Case Study of 10 Asian Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 21(67), 131-152. (In Persian). Wang, H. C., He, J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2009). Firm-Specific Knowledge Resources and Competitive Advantage: The Roles of Economic- and Relationship-Based Employee Governance Mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1265-1285. Yoon, A. (2017). The Role of Private Disclosures in Markets with Weak Institutions: Evidence from Market Liberalization in China. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 433–455. Zhang, L., Li, Zh., Liao, Y., Wang, Y. & Ning Hu, N. (2023). Foreign Investment and Information Quality-A Quasi-Experiment from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102796. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 444 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 288 |
||