Investigating the effects of porosity on the strength and mechanical behaviors of geo-materials’ specimens | |
| روش های تحلیلی و عددی در مهندسی معدن | |
| مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 39، تیر 1403، صفحه 1-12 اصل مقاله (1.25 M) | |
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | |
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/anm.2024.21058.1620 | |
| نویسندگان | |
| Abolfazl Dalirnasab1؛ Mohammad Fatehi Marji* 1؛ Hamid Reza Nejati2؛ Mohsen Mohebbi1 | |
| 1Dept. of Mining and Metallurgy Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | |
| 2Dept. of Rock Mechanics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | |
| چکیده | |
| Porosity plays a crucial role in both natural and man-made materials, serving as a fundamental microstructural characteristic that has a significant impact on their physical properties. Soils and rocks in nature are porous materials that are usually saturated with different fluids such as water, oil and gas. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the properties of porous materials and a better understanding of porous materials properties can lead to progress in oil, mining, and civil industries. In this research, porous samples with different porosity percentages were made and analyzed. The laboratory generation of actual porosity within the rock-like material samples was one of a significant aspect of this research. 5 groups of samples with different percentage of porosities were prepared including: 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 2% porosity and classified in 5 groups of A, B, C, D and E, respectively. Various experimental tests were performed with loading rate .5 MPa per second on the samples and the mechanical parameters of the samples were determined. These experiments show that the uniaxial compression and tensile strengths and elastic modulus of the rock-like specimens decrease with increasing their porosity. The mechanical parameters' maximum values were associated with group E samples (with 2-3% porosity). This group demonstrated a strength of approximately 34 MPa, an elastic modulus of 36 GPa, and a tensile strength of 7.3 MPa. The minimum values were observed in group A (with 20% porosity), which exhibited a strength of approximately 13 MPa, an elastic modulus of 16 GPa, and a tensile strength of 2.7 MPa. The study also investigated the Poisson’s ratio. The results indicate that Poisson's ratio increases with increasing porosity. The maximum Poisson's ratio was found in group A, which had 20% porosity and 11% Poisson's ratio, while the minimum value was found in group E, which had 2-3% porosity and 26% Poisson's ratio. the result show that Porosity has the greatest effect on the tensile strength parameter, which can change the tensile strength by 270% with a 20% change. | |
| کلیدواژهها | |
| Porosity؛ Uniaxial compressive strength؛ Tensile strength؛ Mechanical properties؛ Rock-like materials | |
| عنوان مقاله [English] | |
| Investigating the effects of porosity on the strength and mechanical behaviors of geo-materials’ specimens | |
| نویسندگان [English] | |
| Abolfazl Dalirnasab1؛ Mohammad Fatehi Marji1؛ Hamid Reza Nejati2؛ Mohsen Mohebbi1 | |
| 1Dept. of Mining and Metallurgy Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | |
| 2Dept. of Rock Mechanics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | |
| چکیده [English] | |
| Porosity plays a crucial role in both natural and man-made materials, serving as a fundamental microstructural characteristic that has a significant impact on their physical properties. Soils and rocks in nature are porous materials that are usually saturated with different fluids such as water, oil and gas. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the properties of porous materials and a better understanding of porous materials properties can lead to progress in oil, mining, and civil industries. In this research, porous samples with different porosity percentages were made and analyzed. The laboratory generation of actual porosity within the rock-like material samples was one of a significant aspect of this research. 5 groups of samples with different percentage of porosities were prepared including: 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 2% porosity and classified in 5 groups of A, B, C, D and E, respectively. Various experimental tests were performed with loading rate .5 MPa per second on the samples and the mechanical parameters of the samples were determined. These experiments show that the uniaxial compression and tensile strengths and elastic modulus of the rock-like specimens decrease with increasing their porosity. The mechanical parameters' maximum values were associated with group E samples (with 2-3% porosity). This group demonstrated a strength of approximately 34 MPa, an elastic modulus of 36 GPa, and a tensile strength of 7.3 MPa. The minimum values were observed in group A (with 20% porosity), which exhibited a strength of approximately 13 MPa, an elastic modulus of 16 GPa, and a tensile strength of 2.7 MPa. The study also investigated the Poisson’s ratio. The results indicate that Poisson's ratio increases with increasing porosity. The maximum Poisson's ratio was found in group A, which had 20% porosity and 11% Poisson's ratio, while the minimum value was found in group E, which had 2-3% porosity and 26% Poisson's ratio. the result show that Porosity has the greatest effect on the tensile strength parameter, which can change the tensile strength by 270% with a 20% change. | |
| کلیدواژهها [English] | |
| Porosity, Uniaxial compressive strength, Tensile strength, Mechanical properties, Rock-like materials | |
| مراجع | |
|
[1] H. D. Cheng, E. Detournay, and Y. Abousleiman, ‘Poroelasticity, vol. 27’, Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media Berlin: Springer, p. 877, 2016.
[2] Y. Dandekar, Petroleum reservoir rock and fluid properties. CRC press, 2013. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1365.
[3] Yu, S. Ji, and Q. Li, ‘Effects of porosity on seismic velocities, elastic moduli and Poisson’s ratios of solid materials and rocks’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2016.
[4] Jodry, M. J. Heap, K. Bayramov, G. Alizada, S. Rustamova, and S. Nabiyeva, ‘Influence of High Temperature on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Porous Limestone from Baku (Azerbaijan)’, Fire, vol. 6, no. 7, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fire6070263.
[5] W. Zhang, H. Qian, Q. Sun, and Y. Chen, ‘Experimental study of the effect of high temperature on primary wave velocity and microstructure of limestone’, Environ Earth Sci, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 5739–5748, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4591-4.
[6] Jodry, M. J. Heap, K. Bayramov, G. Alizada, S. Rustamova, and S. Nabiyeva, ‘Influence of High Temperature on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Porous Limestone from Baku (Azerbaijan)’, Fire, vol. 6, no. 7, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fire6070263.
[7] Y. Zhang, H. Li, A. Abdelhady, J. Yang, and H. Wang, ‘Effects of specimen shape and size on the permeability and mechanical properties of porous concrete’, Constr Build Mater, vol. 266, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121074.
[8] C. Lian, Y. Zhuge, and S. Beecham, ‘The relationship between porosity and strength for porous concrete’, Constr Build Mater, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 4294–4298, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.05.005.
[9] S. B. Park, Y. Il Jang, J. Lee, and B. J. Lee, ‘An experimental study on the hazard assessment and mechanical properties of porous concrete utilizing coal bottom ash coarse aggregate in Korea’, J Hazard Mater, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 348–355, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.054.
[10] Q. Yu, W. Zhu, P. G. Ranjith, and S. Shao, ‘Numerical simulation and interpretation of the grain size effect on rock strength’, Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–173, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40948-018-0080-z.
[11] M. Benaicha, O. Jalbaud, A. Hafidi Alaoui, and Y. Burtschell, ‘Porosity effects on rheological and mechanical behavior of self-compacting concrete’, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 48, p. 103964, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103964.
[12] R. Alyousef, H. Alabduljabbar, A. M. Mohamed, A. Alaskar, K. Jermsittiparsert, and L. S. Ho, ‘A model to develop the porosity of concrete as important mechanical property’, Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002614143
[13] Y. Zhang, H. Li, A. Abdelhady, J. Yang, and H. Wang, ‘Effects of specimen shape and size on the permeability and mechanical properties of porous concrete’, Constr Build Mater, vol. 266, p. 121074, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121074.
[14] A. P. S. Selvadurai, ‘On the poroelastic biot coefficient for a granitic rock’, Geosciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 5, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/geosciences11050219.
[15] M. Azadpour, A. Javaherian, M. R. Saberi, M. Shabani, and H. Shojaei, ‘Rock physics model-based investigation on the relationship between static and dynamic Biot’s coefficients in carbonate rocks’, J Pet Sci Eng, vol. 211, p. 110243, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110243.
[16] E. Asadollahpour et al., ‘Biot’s coefficient determination of carbonate reservoir rocks by using static and dynamic experimental tests at ambient and reservoir temperatures - A case study from Iran carbonate field’, J Pet Sci Eng, vol. 196, p. 108061, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108061.
[17] A. Abdollahipour, M. Fatehi Marji, A. Yarahmadi Bafghi, and J. Gholamnejad, ‘A complete formulation of an indirect boundary element method for poroelastic rocks’, Comput Geotech, vol. 74, pp. 15–25, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.12.011.
[18] M. D. Firoozabadi, M. F. Marji, A. Abdollahipour, A. Y. Bafghi, and Y. Mirzaeian, ‘Simulation of Crack Propagation Mechanism in Porous Media using Modified linear Element Displacement Discontinuity Method’, Journal of Mining and Environment, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 903–927, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.22044/jme.2022.12246.2223.
[19] O. Duran, M. Sanei, P. R. B. Devloo, and E. S. R. Santos, ‘An enhanced sequential fully implicit scheme for reservoir geomechanics’, Comput Geosci, vol. 24, pp. 1557–1587, 2020.
[20] M. Sanei, O. Duran, P. R. B. Devloo, and E. S. R. Santos, ‘Analysis of pore collapse and shear-enhanced compaction in hydrocarbon reservoirs using coupled poro-elastoplasticity and permeability’, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 645, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-06754-8.
[21] M. Sanei, O. Duran, P. R. B. Devloo, and E. S. R. Santos, ‘Evaluation of the impact of strain-dependent permeability on reservoir productivity using iterative coupled reservoir geomechanical modeling’, Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 54, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40948-022-00344-y.
[22] The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007-2014. Springer International Publishing, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07713-0.
[23] D. R. Askeland, ‘The Science and Engineering of Materials’, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 380, 1994, doi: 10.1080/03043799408928327.
[24] K. Golec, J. F. Palierne, F. Zara, S. Nicolle, and G. Damiand, ‘Hybrid 3D mass-spring system for simulation of isotropic materials with any Poisson’s ratio’, Visual Computer, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 809–825, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00371-019-01663-0.
[25] F. G. Bell and B. G. Survey, ‘Rock Properties and Their Assessment’, 2005.
[26] W. Lin, ‘An experimental study on measurement methods of bulk density and porosity of rock samples’, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, vol. 3, no. 05, p. 72, 2015.
[27] S. Peng and J. Zhang, Engineering geology for underground rocks. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
[28] H. A. Kim and R. A. Guyer, ‘WILEY VCH WEINHEIM GERMANY’.
[29] D. Rosato and D. Rosato, ‘3 - DESIGN PARAMETER’, in Plastics Engineered Product Design, D. Rosato and D. Rosato, Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2003, pp. 161–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-185617416-9/50004-1.
[30] Y. M. Poplavko, ‘Mechanical properties of solids’, in Electronic Materials, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 71–93. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815780-0.00002-5.
[31] M. N. J. AlAwad, ‘Modification of the Brazilian indirect tensile strength formula for better estimation of the tensile strength of rocks and rock-like geomaterials’, Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 147–154, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.08.003.
[32] ‘Designation: D 3967-95a Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens 1’.
[33] Y. Zhou, L. Yang, and Y. Huang, Micro-and macromechanical properties of materials. CRC Press, 2013.
[34] L. Feng, Materials engineering and automatic control: selected, peer reviewed papers from the 2012 International Conference on Materials Engineering and Automatic Control (ICMEAC 2012), August 27-28, 2012, Jinan, China. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2012.
[35] R. K. Kumar, S. C. Vettivel, and R. Subramanian, Mechanical Properties and Characterization of Additively Manufactured Materials. CRC Press, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=k3fREAAAQBAJ
[36] K. Antony and J. P. Davim, Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Science: Selected Extended Papers of ICAMMS 2018. Springer, 2018.
|
|
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 313
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 152