نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در حفاظت محیط زیستی اراضی کشاورزی مناطق خشک (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان باوی) | ||
خشک بوم | ||
دوره 13، شماره 2، مهر 1402، صفحه 53-69 اصل مقاله (871.3 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/aridbiom.2024.20672.1958 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مسلم سواری* 1؛ سجاد شحیطزاده2 | ||
1دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی کارشناسیارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در حفاظت محیط زیستی اراضی کشاورزی مناطق خشک است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل تمامی کشاورزان شهرستان باوی استان خوزستان بود. حجم نمونه با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان تعداد 390 نفر با روش نمونهگیری چندمرحلهای برای مطالعه انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمعآوری دادهها پرسشنامهای بود که روایی صوری و محتوایی آن براساس نظر اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان و پایایی آن از طریق آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. از طرفی، از شاخص میانگین واریانس استخراج شده (AVE) برای تعیین روایی سازه و شاخص پایایی ترکیبی (CR) برای تعیین پایایی مدل استفاده شد. نتایج اولویتبندی حفاظت محیط زیستی اراضی کشاورزی مناطق خشک نشان داد که دو رفتار «استفاده از شخم حداقل به منظور کاهش فرسایش خاک» و «استفاده از کودهای آلی و دامی در مزرعه» بهترتیب از اولویت بالاتری در میان کشاورزان برخوردار بود. علاوه بر این، نتایج مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری نشان داد ابعاد سرمایه اجتماعی (هنجارهای اجتماعی، آگاهی اجتماعی، شبکههای اجتماعی، مشارکت اجتماعی و اعتماد اجتماعی) اثر قابل توجهی بر حفاظت محیط زیستی اراضی کشاورزی مناطق خشک دارند که سرانجام، توانستند 73 درصد از واریانس متغیرها وابسته تحقیق یعنی حفاظت محیط زیستی این اراضی را تبیین نمایند. یافتههای این پژوهش ضمن افزودن دانش جدید به ادبیات موضوعهای محیط زیستی در مناطق خشک، میتواند در برنامهریزی و سیاستگذاری برای کاهش مشکلات محیط زیستی ناشی از بخش کشاورزی مفید واقع شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
توسعه پایدار؛ رفتارهای دوستدارانه؛ توسعه کشاورزی؛ محیطزیست؛ استان خوزستان | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The role of social capital in the environmental protection of agricultural lands in dry areas (Case study: Bavi County) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Moslem Savari1؛ Sajad Shehitzadeh2 | ||
1Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran | ||
2MSc student in Rural development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The main purpose of this research is to investigate the role of social capital in the environmental protection of agricultural lands in dry areas. The statistical population of this research included all the farmers of Bavi County (Khuzestan province). A sample size of 390 people was selected for the study using a stratified sampling method with proportional assignment. The data collection tool is a questionnaire, the validity of which was determined based on the opinion of the faculty members of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, and its reliability was determined through Cronbach's alpha. On the other hand, the Average Variance Extracted Index (AVE) was used to determine construct validity and the Composite Reliability Index (CR) was used to determine model reliability. The results of prioritizing the environmental protection of agricultural lands in dry areas showed that the two behaviors "use of plow at least to reduce soil erosion" and "use of organic and animal fertilizers in the field" were respectively of higher priority among farmers. In addition, the results of structural equation modeling showed that the dimensions of social capital (social norms, social awareness, social networks, social participation and social trust) have a significant effect on the environmental protection behavior of agricultural lands in arid regions, which were finally able to reach 73% To explain the variance of the dependent variables of the research, i.e. environmental protection of agricultural lands in dry areas. The findings of this research, while adding new knowledge to the literature on environmental issues in dry areas, can be useful in planning and policy-making to reduce environmental problems caused by the agricultural sector. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Sustainable development, Friendly behaviors, Agricultural development, Environment, Khuzestan province | ||
مراجع | ||
[1]. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global environmental change, 23(6), 1773-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029
[2]. Akber, N., Paltasingh, K. R., & Mishra, A. K. (2022). How can public policy encourage private investments in Indian agriculture? Input subsidies vs. public investment. Food Policy, 107, 102210. doi:1016/j.foodpol.2021.102210
[3]. Akintunde, E. A. (2017). Theories and concepts for human behavior in environmental preservation. Journal of environmental science and public health, 1(2), 120e133. doi: 10.26502/JESPH.012
[4]. Akter, M., Fan, L., Rahman, M. M., Geissen, V., & Ritsema, C. J. (2018). Vegetable farmers’ behaviour and knowledge related to pesticide use and related health problems: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 122-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.130
[5]. Alcock, I., White, M. P., Pahl, S., Duarte-Davidson, R., & Fleming, L. E. (2020). Associations between pro-environmental behaviour and neighbourhood nature, nature visit frequency and nature appreciation: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in England. Environment international, 136, 105441. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105441
[6]. Anh, H. Q., Le, T. P. Q., Da Le, N., Lu, X. X., Duong, T. T., Garnier, J., ... & Nguyen, T. A. H. (2021). Antibiotics in surface water of East and Southeast Asian countries: A focused review on contamination status, pollution sources, potential risks, and future perspectives. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142865
[7]. Aprile, M. C., & Fiorillo, D. (2017). Water conservation behavior and environmental concerns: Evidence from a representative sample of Italian individuals. Journal of cleaner production, 159, 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.036
[8]. Bagheri, A., Bondori, A., Allahyari, M. S., & Surujlal, J. (2021). Use of biologic inputs among cereal farmers: application of technology acceptance model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 5165-5181. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00808-9
[9]. Bahrulolum, H., Nooraei, S., Javanshir, N., Tarrahimofrad, H., Mirbagheri, V. S., Easton, A. J., & Ahmadian, G. (2021). Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using microorganisms and their application in the agrifood sector. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 19(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00834-3
[10]. Behl, T., Kaur, I., Sehgal, A., Singh, S., Sharma, N., Bhatia, S., ... & Bungau, S. (2022). The dichotomy of nanotechnology as the cutting edge of agriculture: Nano- arming as an asset versus nanotoxicity. Chemosphere, 288, 132533. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132533
[11]. Blackburn, M. R. (2013). The co–worker training mode. Journal of Intellectual & Development Diability, 26, 143-159.
[12]. Bleys, B., Defloor, B., Van Ootegem, L., & Verhofstadt, E. (2018). The environmental impact of individual behavior: Self-assessment versus the ecological footprint. Environment and Behavior, 50(2), 187-212. doi: 10.1177/0013916517693046
[13]. Blomquist, J., & Nordin, M. (2017). Do the CAP subsidies increase employment in Sweden? Estimating the effects of government transfers using an exogenous change in the CAP. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 63, 13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.12.001
[14]. Broska, L. H. (2021). It’s all about community: On the interplay of social capital, social needs, and environmental concern in sustainable community action. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 102165.
[15]. Cai, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2015). Social trust, income level and farmers participating in provision of rural public goods. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 15(1), 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102165
[16]. Cecílio Filho, A. B., Nascimento, C. S., de Jesus Pereira, B., & Nascimento, C. S. (2022). Nitrogen fertilisation impacts greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, and agronomic responses of beet intercropped with arugula. Journal of Environmental Management, 307, 114568. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114568
[17]. Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social indicators research, 75(2), 273-302. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
[18]. Dai, J., Chen, J., Luo, Z., & Zhou, W. (2023). Coping with giant panda nature reserve protection dilemmas in China: Social capital’s role in forest conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 42, e02379. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02379
[19]. De Clercq, B., Vyncke, V., Hublet, A., Elgar, F. J., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Currie, C. & Maes, L. (2012). Social capital and social inequality in adolescents’ health in 601 Flemish communities: A multilevel analysis. Social science & medicine, 74(2), 202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.025
[20]. De Krom, M. (2017). Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: regionalisation and the role of bridging social capital. Land use policy, 60, 352-361. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.026
[21]. Dorigoni, A., & Bonini, N. (2023). Water bottles or tap water? A descriptive-social-norm based intervention to increase a pro-environmental behavior in a restaurant. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86, 101971. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101971
[22]. Dornhoff, M., Sothmann, J. N., Fiebelkorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2019). Nature relatedness and environmental concern of young people in Ecuador and Germany. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00453
[23]. Edwards, R. W. (2004). Measuring social capital: An Australian framework and indicators. Information Paper. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
[24]. FAO. (2018). Global consumption of agricultural fertilizer by nutrient from 2013 to 2018 (in million metric tons). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
[25]. Ferguson, B. J., Mens, C., Hastwell, A. H., Zhang, M., Su, H., Jones, C. H. & Gresshoff, P. M. (2019). Legume nodulation: The host controls the party. Plant, cell & environment, 42(1), 41-51. doi: 10.1111/pce.13348.
[26]. Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1385-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.026
[27]. Gächter, S., & Renner, E. (2018). Leaders as role models and ‘belief managers’ in social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 154, 321-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.08.001
[28]. Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2012). Who makes a good leader? Cooperativeness, optimism, and leading‐by‐example. Economic Inquiry, 50(4), 953-967. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00295.x
[29]. Gao, S., Grebitus, C., & Schmitz, T. (2022). Effects of risk preferences and social networks on adoption of genomics by Chinese hog farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 111-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.05.018
[30]. Granovetter, M. (1985). The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
[31]. Guo, Q. H., Li, S. P., & Li, H. (2018). Adoption behaviors of farmers’ chemical fertilizer reduction measures based on the perspective of social norms. Journal of arid land resources and environment, 32, 50-55. doi: 10.3390/su11010136
[32]. Harou, A. P., Madajewicz, M., Michelson, H., Palm, C. A., Amuri, N., Magomba, C., Semoka, M. A., Tschirhart, K. & Weil, R. (2022). The joint effects of information and financing constraints on technology adoption: Evidence from a field experiment in rural Tanzania. Journal of Development Economics, 155, 102707. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102707
[33]. Heinicke, F., König-Kersting, C., & Schmidt, R. (2022). Injunctive vs. descriptive social norms and reference group dependence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195, 199-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.008
[34]. Janmaimool, P., & Denpaiboon, C. (2016). Evaluating determinants of rural Villagers’ engagement in conservation and waste management behaviors based on integrated conceptual framework of Pro-environmental behavior. Life sciences, society and policy, 12(1), 12. doi: 10.1186/s40504-016-0045-3
[35]. Jarosz, L. (2000). Understanding agri-food networks as social relations. Agriculture and human values, 17, 279-283. doi: 10.1023/A:1007692303118
[37]. Jeffrey, P., & Jefferson, B. (2003). Public receptivity regarding “in-house” water recycling: results from a UK survey. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 3(3), 109-116. doi: 10.2166/ws.2003.0015
[38]. Khan, Z. A., Zhu, J., Khan, A., Koondhar, M. A., Kakar, S. K., Ali, U., & Tianjun, L. (2023). Farmers’ social networks’ effects on the sustainable production of fresh apples in China’s Shaanxi province. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1177028. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1177028
[39]. Khanpae, M., Karami, E., Maleksaeidi, H., & Keshavarz, M. (2020). Farmers’ attitude towards using treated wastewater for irrigation: The question of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118541. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118541
[40]. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
[41]. Lede, E., Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2019). Optimizing the influence of social norms interventions: Applying social identity insights to motivate residential water conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.011
[42]. Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
[43]. Li, X., Molleman, L., & van Dolder, D. (2021). Do descriptive social norms drive peer punishment? Conditional punishment strategies and their impact on cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(5), 469-479. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.04.002
[44]. Ling, M., & Xu, L. (2020). Relationships between personal values, micro-contextual factors and residents’ pro-environmental behaviors: An explorative study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104697. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104697
[45]. Liu, J., Qu, H., Huang, D., Chen, G., Yue, X., Zhao, X., & Liang, Z. (2014). The role of social capital in encouraging residents' pro-environmental behaviors in community-based ecotourism. Tourism Management, 41, 190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.016
[46]. Ma, Z., Guo, S., Deng, X., & Xu, D. (2022). Place attachment, community trust, and farmer's community participation: Evidence from the hardest-hit areas of Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73, 102892.
[47]. Macias, T., & Williams, K. (2016). Know your neighbors, save the planet: Social capital and the widening wedge of pro-environmental outcomes. Environment and Behavior, 48(3), 391-420. doi: 10.1177/0013916514540458
[48]. Marbuah, G. (2019). Is willingness to contribute for environmental protection in Sweden affected by social capital?. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 21(3), 451-475. doi: 10.1007/s10018-019-00238-6
[49]. Martiskainen, M. (2017). The role of community leadership in the development of grassroots innovations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.05.002
[50]. Matthew, D. M. Nicholas L. (2013). Social capital, type of crime, and social control. Journal Research in Crime & Delinquency, 62, 728-747. doi: 10.1177/0011128713510082
[51]. Miller, E., & Buys, L. (2008). The impact of social capital on residential water-affecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community. Society and Natural Resources, 21(3), 244-257. doi: 10.1080/08941920701818258
[52]. Moon, W. K., Kahlor, L. A., & Olson, H. C. (2020). Understanding public support for carbon capture and storage policy: The roles of social capital, stakeholder perceptions, and perceived risk/benefit of technology. Energy Policy, 139, 111312. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111312
[53]. Morais, M., Borges, J. A. R., & Binotto, E. (2018). Using the reasoned action approach to understand Brazilian successors’ intention to take over the farm. Land use policy, 71, 445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.002
[54]. Mouw, T. (2006). Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual review of sociology, 32, 79-102. doi: 10.1146/annurev.32.061604.123150
[55]. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
[56]. Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 22(1), 5-34. doi: 10.1177/028072700402200101
[57]. Niazi, M. (2011). Associations between Levels of Education and Social and National Coherence and Solidarity. National Studies Journal, 12(48), 31-50. [in Farsi].
[58]. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
[59]. Paluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2012). The salience of social referents: a field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(6), 899. doi: 10.1037/a0030015
[60]. Prager, K., Nienaber, B., Neumann, B., & Phillips, A. (2015). How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management?. Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006
[61]. Razzaghi Borkhani, F., Mohammadi, Y. (2019). Perceived outcomes of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) technologies adoption in citrus farms of Iran (reflection of environment-friendly technologies). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7), 6829–6838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-04083-0
[62]. Ren, Z., Fu, Z., & Zhong, K. (2022). The influence of social capital on farmers’ green control technology adoption behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1001442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001442
[63]. Savari, M. (2023). Explaining the ranchers’ behavior of rangeland conservation in western Iran. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1090723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1090723
[64]. Savari, M., & Khaleghi, B. (2023). The role of social capital in forest conservation: An approach to deal with deforestation. Science of The Total Environment, 896, 165216. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165216
[65]. Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H. Eskandari Damaneh, H. & Cotton, M. (2023). Integrating the norm activation model and theory of planned behaviour to investigate farmer pro-environmental behavioural intention. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32831-x
[66]. Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H., & Eskandari Damaneh, H. (2023). The effect of social capital in mitigating drought impacts and improving livability of Iranian rural households. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 89, 103630. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103630
[67]. Savari, M., Naghibeiranvand, F., & Asadi, Z. (2022). Modeling environmentally responsible behaviors among rural women in the forested regions in Iran. Global Ecology and Conservation, 35, e02102. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02102
[68]. Savari, M., Savari Mombeni, A., & Izadi, H. (2022). Socio-psychological determinants of Iranian rural households' adoption of water consumption curtailment behaviors. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 13077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17560-x
[69]. Savari, M., Sheheytavi, A., & Amghani, M. S. (2023). Promotion of adopting preventive behavioral intention toward biodiversity degradation among Iranian farmers. Global Ecology and Conservation, 43, e02450. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02450
[70]. Savari, M., Sheheytavi, A., & Shokati Amghani, M. S. (2023). Factors underpinning Iranian farmers’ intention to conserve biodiversity at the farm level. Journal for Nature Conservation, 73, 126419. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126419
[71]. Schreinemachers, P., Grovermann, C., Praneetvatakul, S., Heng, P., Nguyen, T. T. L., Buntong, B., & Pinn, T. (2020). How much is too much? Quantifying pesticide overuse in vegetable production in Southeast Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118738. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118738
[72]. Song, Z., & Soopramanien, D. (2019). Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijing. Cities, 84, 112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.012
[73]. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of environmental psychology, 29(3), 309-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[74]. Tang, Y., Geng, L., Schultz, P. W., Zhou, K., & Xiang, P. (2017). The effects of mindful learning on pro-environmental behavior: A self-expansion perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.005
[75]. Theriault, V., & Smale, M. (2021). The unintended consequences of the fertilizer subsidy program on crop species diversity in Mali. Food Policy, 102, 102121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102121
[76]. Thondhlana, G., & Hlatshwayo, T. N. (2018). Pro-environmental behaviour in student residences at Rhodes University, South Africa. Sustainability, 10(8), 2746. doi: 10.3390/su10082746
[77]. Van Aalderen, N., & Horlings, L. G. (2020). Accommodative public leadership in wind energy development: Enabling citizens initiatives in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 138, 111249. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111249
[78]. Vesely, S., Klöckner, C. A., & Brick, C. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior as a signal of cooperativeness: Evidence from a social dilemma experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101362
[79]. Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sáinz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2013). Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
[80]. Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., ... & Rognli, J. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001
[81]. Yoder, L., & Chowdhury, R. R. (2018). Tracing social capital: How stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades. Land Use Policy, 77, 354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.038
[82].Yun, S., & Lee, J. (2015). Advancing societal readiness toward renewable energy system adoption with a socio-technical perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.016
[83]. Zhang, R., Zheng, H., Zhang, H., & Hu, F. (2020). Study on the influence of social capital on farmers’ participation in rural domestic sewage treatment in Nanjing, China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(7), 2479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072479
[84]. Zheng, S., & Yu, L. (2022). The government's subsidy strategy of carbon-sink fishery based on evolutionary game. Energy, 254, 124282. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124282
[85]. Zheng, S., Yin, K., & Yu, L. (2022). Factors influencing the farmer's chemical fertilizer reduction behavior from the perspective of farmer differentiation. Heliyon, 8(12), 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11918
[86]. Zheng, W., & Luo, B. (2022). Understanding pollution behavior among farmers: Exploring the influence of social networks and political identity on reducing straw burning in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102553. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102553
[87]. Zhu, J., & Liu, T. (2018, July). Research on social network and farmers' safety production behavior. In 2018 international seminar on education research and social science (ISERSS 2018) (pp. 241-244), Atlantis Press.
[88]. Zhu, Q. Y., Chen, Y. R., Hu, W. Y., Mei, Y., & Yuan, K. H. (2019). A study on the relationship between social capital, cultivated land value cognition and farmers’ willingness to pay for cultivated land protection. Land, 29, 120-131. doi: 10.3390/land12040861 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 424 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 193 |