اثر تکانه نقدینگی بانکها بر ذخایر مازاد و چرخههای تجاری در ایران با رویکرد مدل DSGE | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 14، شماره 28، مهر 1401، صفحه 247-283 اصل مقاله (912.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2023.19347.2376 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سارا گوهری انارکی* 1؛ محسن مهر ارا2؛ سجاد برخورداری3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، پردیس ارس دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استاد دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این مطالعه بررسی تاثیر شوک نقدینگی بانکها بر ذخایر مازاد آنها و همچنین چرخههای تجاری در اقتصاد ایران است. در راستای تجزیه و تحلیل نتایج از روش تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی با لحاظ ساختار سیستم بانکی در بازه زمانی 1399-1370 بر اساس فراوانی دادههای فصلی استفاده گردید. در بخش تحلیل آماری اثر شوک وارد شده از ناحیه نقدینگی بانک بر ذخایر مازاد آنها و همچنین چرخههای تجاری و منتخبی از متغیرهای بانکی و اقتصاد کلان مورد مقایسه و ارزیابی قرار گرفت. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده میتوان بیان کرد که شوک نقدینگی وارد شده از سیستم بانکی منجر به افزایش ذخایر مازاد آنها شده و علاوه بر این منجر به بروز چرخههای تجاری و انحراف در تولید شده است. همچنین شوک نقدینگی منجر به افزایش در نرخ تورم و نرخ ارز در اقتصاد شده است. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده توصیه میشود با استفاده از سیاستهای احتیاطی و نامتعارف از بروز شوکهای نقدینگی از ناحیه سیستم بانکی بر اقتصاد جلوگیری شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نقدینگی؛ ذخایر مازاد؛ چرخههای تجاری؛ سیستم بانکی؛ مدل تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی (DSGE) | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluating the effect of banks' liquidity shock on the excess reserves and business cycles in Iran with the DSGE model | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sara Gohri Anaraki1؛ Mohsen Mehrara2؛ Sajjad Barkhirdari3 | ||
| 1PhD student in Economics, Ares Campus of Tehran University | ||
| 2Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of banks' liquidity shock on their excess reserves and the business cycles in Iran's economy. In order to benefit from the functional tasks of the banking system in the real sector of the economy, it is necessary to control the liquidity in the hands of the bank. The liquidity management by the bank includes predicting liquidity needs and providing them at the lowest possible cost. The main reason for the liquidity risk is that most bank resources are provided from short-term deposits, while the bank facilities are used to invest in assets that have a relatively low degree of liquidity. Therefore, a main task of the bank should be creating a balance between short-term financial obligations and long-term investments. Maintaining insufficient amounts of liquidity exposes the bank to the risk of not being able to fulfill its obligations and pushes it toward bankruptcy. Also, maintaining large amounts of liquidity causes inefficient allocation of resources, reduction of the interest rate on deposits and, as a result, losing the market. Methodology: In order to analyze the results, the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium method was used in terms of the structure of the banking system in the period of 1989-2020 based on the frequency of the seasonal data. In the statistical analysis section, the impacts of the impulse from liquidity on the surplus bank reserves, business cycles, and a set of banking and macroeconomic variables were compared and evaluated. The current research model has five parts including household sectors, producers of intermediate goods and final goods, banking sector, government and central bank. The household sector maximizes the expected discounted utility function with respect to the inter-period budget constraint. Intermediary companies seek to minimize the production cost function, and the company producing the final product deals with pricing based on Rotenberg's price stickiness theory. In order to maximize the expected profit function, the banking sector makes its decisions to determine the optimal interest rates of deposits and facilities for both households and companies. It should be mentioned that regarding bank rates for deposits and facilities, although the range of interest rates for deposits and facilities is communicated to the banks, the banks act based on other variables. They have the option to consider the maximum expected profit function based on their requirements, such as the amount of the fixed balance in the customer's account of facility reception or the interest paid to depositors. Finally, the government and the central bank are face with an inter-period budget constraint. Results and Discussion: Based on the obtained results, the momentum of liquidity induced by the banking system has led to an increase in their surplus reserves and the occurrence of business cycles and deviations in production. Also, the liquidity shock has led to an increase in the inflation rate and exchange rate in the economy. It is recommended to eliminate the effect of liquidity shocks of the banking system on the economy by using precautionary and unconventional policies. In order to improve the relationship between the Central Bank and the banks, managing the overdrafts of the banks from the Central Bank by guaranteeing the overdrafts and regular financing is an important and fundamental task in the agenda of the Central Bank. The intelligent monitoring of the facilities and transactions in the banking network by the Central Bank can correct the asset and capital structure of banks, improve the risk management system, transparency of financial reporting in banks, organize the non-banking activities of banks and their subsidiaries, and prevent the entry of resources into speculative activities. Also, selling the surplus assets of banks is considered as an important act to reform the functioning of the banking system. Conclusion: The liquidity shock from the banking system has led to an increase in their excess reserves, the emergence of business cycles and fluctuations in production, and increased inflation rate and exchange rate in the economy. Based on the results, it is recommended to prevent liquidity shocks from the banking system by using conservative and unconventional policies. Since an important part of creating liquidity in the country's economy has been done by banks in the past years, controlling the creation of money and liquidity by banks can play an important role in reducing the growth of liquidity and inflation. Therefore, there is a need for structural reforms and the supervision of the banking system. According to the proposed economic theories and the results obtained from this study, if a change is made in the credit risk, liquidity of commercial banks in money creation, and therefore the profit margin of the banks, monetary policy may be able to directly influence the interest rate in the credit market. In this case, an asymmetry may arise. An increase in the policy-based interest rate always leads to an increase in the interest rate in the credit market because commercial banks have to compensate the costs of re-borrowing and have to earn at least a profit. But if the liquidity risk and credit risk of commercial banks increase due to increased uncertainty, or if the level of banks' requested interest increases, a reduction in the base rate may not be immediately accompanied by a reduction in the credit market rate. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Liquidity, Excess reserves, Business cycles, Banking system, Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedkhani, R. Mousavi, S. N. & Majdzadeh Tabatabai, S. (2021). "Study the Effects of Tax Shock on Macroeconomic Variables in an Oil Economy with the Approach of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE)". Economic Growth and Development Research 11(43): 82-65. (In Persian) Berger, A. N. & Sedunov, J. (2017). "Bank Liquidity Creation and Real Economic Output". Journal of Banking & Finance 81(C): 1-19. Bratsiotis, G. J. & Theodoridis, K. (2021). "Precautionary Liquidity Shocks, Excess Reserves and Business Cycles". EconStor Preprints 243121, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. De Walque, G. and de Walque, G. Pierrard, O. & Rouabah, A. (2008). "Financial (In) Stability, Supervision and Liquidity Injections: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach". National Bank of Belgium Working Paper No. 148. Dib. A. (2010). "Banks, Credit Market Frictions, and Business Cycles". Staff Working Papers 10-24, Bank of Canada. Fale Nasiri, M. R. Khochiani, R. Esaish, H. & Sajjadi Far, S. H. (2022). "The Mechanism of Effect of Economic Factors on the Volume of Bank Deposits in Iran's Banking System (The Test of Money Endogeneity versus Money Externality)". Financial Economics 16(59): 179-200. Fisher, I. (1933). "The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions". Econometrica 1(4): 337-357. Gertler, M. & Kiyotaki, N. (2015). "Banking, Liquidity, and Bank Runs in an Infinite Horizon Economy". The American Economic Review 105(7): 2011-2043. Gholami, A. Salimi, E. & Adabi Airouzjaee, B. (2022). "Investigating the Effects of Stock Earnings and Bank Deposits Tax Shocks in the Context of Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium". The Journal of Economic Policy 14(27): 215-245. Gudarzi Farahani, Y. & Arabi, S. (2021). "The Collateral Constraint and its Impacts on the Banking Performance and Macroeconomic Variables". The Journal of Economic Policy 13(25): 375-405. Gudarzi Farahani, Y. Arabi, S. & Adeli, O. (2021). "Modeling the Role of Banking Risks on the Performance of the Banking System and Macroeconomic Variables with the DSGE Model Approach". Journal of Econometric Modelling 6(3): 151-181. Izadi, H. and Sayareh, M. (2019). “Investigating the Role of Labor Division into Internal and External Sectors in the Iranian Economy within the Framework of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model”. Journal of Econometric Modeling 4(3): 87-110 (In Persian). Izadkhasti, H. (2017). “Analyzing the Impact of Credit Creation in Fractional Reserve Banking on Macroeconomic Variables in Iran”. Journal of Iran's Economic Essays 14(27): 9-34 (In Persian). Jumono, S. Iskandar, M. D. Adhikara, M. F. A. & Mala, C. M. F. (2021). "Bank Liquidity and Economic Development in Underdeveloped Regions: An Empirical Study in Indonesia". The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8(7): 31-42. Kakavandi, M. Rahbar, F. Mehrara, M. & Sarem, M. (2021). "Presenting a Model of How the Central Bank Policies Affect Macroeconomic Variables: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach". The Journal of Economic Policy 13(25): 109-142. Kaviani, M. (2019). "The Dynamics of the Beta Coefficient of Stock Prediction in the Framework of Structural Macroeconomic Models". Journal of Decisions and Operations Research 4(2): 137-157. Komijani, A. & Alinejad-Mehrabani, F. (2012). "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Monetary Transmission Channels on Production and Inflation besides Analyzing their Relative Importance in Iran’s Economy". Planning and Budgeting 17(2): 39-63. Kydland, F. E. & Prescott, E. C. (1982). "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations". Econometrica 50(6): 1345-1370. Lotfalipour, M. R. Karimzadeh, M. and Enami, A. (2018). “Investigating the Effects of Banking Resources Shock on Consumption and Investment in IRAN, by DSGE Approach”. Journal of Econometric Modeling 3(3): 113-146 (In Persian). Mahmmodinia, D. Mohammadi, Z. & Memarzade, A. (2019). "Liquidity Creation Index Calculation in the Framework of Berger and Baumann's Pattern and its Impact on Banking Crises: An Application of the Logit and Probit Panel Model". Economic Strategy 8(28): 12-34. Manish, K. & Ghanshyam, C. Y. (2013). "Liquidity Risk Management in Bank: A Conceptual Framework". AIMA Journal of Management & Research 7(3): 1-12. Mankiw, N. G. (1986). "The Allocation of Credit and Financial Collapse". The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(3): 455-470. Mian, Atif R. & Santos, João A. C. (2018). "Liquidity Risk, and Maturity Management over the Credit Cycle". Journal of Financial Economics (JFE): 127. Michael, K. Jaromir, B. & Douglas, L. (2014). "Financial Crises in DSGE Models: A Prototype Model". IMF Working Papers 2014/057, International Monetary Fund. Minetti, R. & Cao, Q. & Di Pietro, M. & Kokas, S. (2019). "Bank Monitoring and Liquidity in the Business Cycle". Working Papers 0000-0, Michigan State University, Department of Economics. Neli, F. Shahchera, M. and Mandana, T. (2014). “Discussing the determinants of liquidity creation and the role of financial intermediation of banks in Iran”. Trend journal 22(7): 5-13 (In Persian) Pourajam, P. Bakhshi Dastj, R. & Nakhli, S. R. (2021). "The Effects of External Money Creation on Macroeconomic, Considering the Inter - Bank Market with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Method". Stable Economy Journal 2(1): 1-29. Rezazadeh Karsalarei, F. & Sargolzaee, M. (2019). "The Impact of Banking Performance on Liquidity Creation in Banking System". Empirical Studies in. Samadi, S, Nasrollahi, K. and Karamalian C. M. (2018). “Development of Financial Markets and Economic Growth”. The Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development) 7(3):1-16 (In Persian). Shahchera, M. and Taheri, M. (2016). “Creation of liquidity and the requirements of Basel 3 liquidity in the country's banking network”. Trend journal 77(2): 31-64 (In Persian). Statistical reports of Central Bank of Iran (2022). “Statistical quarterly reports of Central Bank” (In Persian). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 727 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 857 |
||