بررسی تأثیر شوکهای پولی، مالی، تجاری و ارزی بر توسعه پایدار اقتصادی در ایران (رهیافت مدل خودرگرسیون برداری ساختاری (SVAR)) | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 14، شماره 28، مهر 1401، صفحه 345-364 اصل مقاله (675.12 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2023.19679.2402 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم افتخاری پور1؛ کاظم یاوری* 2؛ عباس علوی راد3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، واحد ابرکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ابرکوه، ایران | ||
| 2استاد اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، واحد ابرکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ابرکوه، ایران دانشکده علوم انسانی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مرور مطالعات بیانگر این است که اکثر تحقیقات موجود بر نقش سیاست پولی یا سیاست مالی به صورت جداگانه متمرکز شدهاند، اما به ندرت بر ترکیب و تعاملات بین سیاستهای پولی، مالی، ارزی و تجاری متمرکز شدهاند. لذا در مطالعه حاضر به بررسی تأثیر شوکهای پولی، مالی و ارزی بر توسعه پایدار اقتصادی در ایران پرداخته شد. برای این منظور دادههای مورد نیاز تحقیق برای دوره 1400-1380 گردآوری و سپس فصلیسازی شد. همچنین، جهت تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از مدل خود رگرسیون برداری ساختاری (SVAR) که دارای یک منطق اقتصادی مبنی بر تئوریهای اقتصادی برای اعمال قیود و محدودیتها میباشد، استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که سیاست پولی انبساطی اثر منفی، سیاست مالی انبساطی اثر مثبت، نوسان نرخ ارز اثر منفی و سیاست تجاری باز، اثر منفی بر توسعه پایدار اقتصادی دارد. با توجه به نتایج حاصل، کاهش استقراض دولت از بانک مرکزی و در اختیار قراردادن منابع مالی به بنگاههای تولیدی، تشکیل بورس ارز، اجرای یک برنامه فراگیر توسعه صادرات و اصلاح و تقویت محیط کلان و محیط نهادی، به عنوان برخی از راهکارهای حصول به توسعه اقتصادی پایدار پیشنهاد شد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| توسعه پایدار اقتصادی؛ سیاست پولی؛ سیاست مالی؛ سیاست ارزی؛ سیاست تجاری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the impact of monetary, financial, commercial and currency shocks on sustainable economic development in Iran through the structural vector autoregression model approach (SVAR) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maryam Eftekhari pour1؛ Kazem Yavari2؛ Abas Alavi rad3 | ||
| 1PhD student in economics, Abarkoh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abarkoh, Iran | ||
| 2Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Abarkoh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abarkoh, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Undoubtedly, macroeconomic policies play a vital role in achieving sustainable economic development, especially during economic crises. The results of the existing studies show that most of them have focused on the role of monetary policy or fiscal policy separately; however, a combination of monetary, fiscal, exchange and trade policies and their interactions have rarely been focused on. Therefore, the present study seeks to investigate the impact of monetary, financial and currency shocks on sustainable economic development in Iran. Methodology: In order to achieve the objectives of the research, certain variables were used, including green gross national product (as an indicator of sustainable economic development), government expenditures (as an indicator of fiscal policy), exchange rate (as a currency policy), the degree of trade openness or the totality of exports and imports (as an indicator of trade policy), and wide money supply (as an indicator of monetary policy). Also, the essential data for the period of 2001-2021 were collected from the Central Bank of Iran, and then they were seasonalized. Moreover, in order to analyze the data, the structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model, which is logically based on economic theories, was used to apply constraints and restrictions. The SVAR model makes it possible to evaluate the impact of various dimensions of shocks caused by monetary, financial, foreign exchange and commercial policies on economic stability in Iran. Finally, the research data were analyzed by means of the Eviews software. Results and Discussion: The results of the Phillips-Perron test for stationarity showed that the variable of commercial openness is at a stationary level and the variables of gross national green production, government expenditures, exchange rate and wide money supply are stationary after one differentiation. Also, the lowest statistical value of Schwartz-Bizen to determine the optimal interval belongs to the first interval, and the optimal interval is model 1. In addition, the statistical values of both the effect test and the maximum eigenvalue are smaller than the critical values at the 95% level. As a result, there is no cumulative or long-term relationship between research variables. The results showed that the monetary policy index (broad money supply) has a negative effect on the sustainable economic development index because an increase in money supply leads to a decrease in the value of the domestic currency and an increase in the price of domestic goods. This, in turn, will lead to a reduction in total demand, and production and has a negative effect on sustainable economic development. So, if a shock of 1% is introduced to the money supply, the green national gross production will decrease by 0.08% in the first period and 0.23% in the second period. After that, the effect of this shock is neutralized during the fifth period and becomes zero. Also, the financial policy index (government spending) has a positive effect on the sustainable economic development index (green national production). This happens due to an increase in the government spending which leads to a corresponding increase in investment, production, gross domestic product and eventually a high level of sustainable economic development. So, if a shock of 1% is introduced to the government's expenses, the green national gross production will increase by 0.04% in the first period, 0.11% in the second period, and 0.16% in the third period. After that, the effect of this shock is neutralized during the fourth period and becomes zero. In addition, the index of foreign exchange policy (exchange rate) negatively affects the index of sustainable economic development (GDP) because an increase in the exchange rate leads to lower values of the domestic currency and higher costs of domestic goods. This, in turn, lead to a decrease in the total demand, and production rate and has a negative effect on sustainable economic development. So, if a shock of 1% is introduced to the exchange rate, the green national gross production will decrease by 0.11% in the first period and 0.16% in the second period. Finally, since trade liberalization leads to indiscriminate imports, misallocation of financial resources, reduction of production and trade and lower levels of sustainable economic development in developing countries, the trade policy index (degree of trade openness) has a negative effect on the sustainable economic development index (green national product). Accordingly, if a shock of 1% is introduced to the degree of commercial openness, the green national gross production will decrease by 0.03% in the first period and 0.08% in the second period. Conclusion: The results showed that the variables of expansionary monetary policy, exchange rate fluctuation and open trade policy have negative effects on economic sustainable development. However, expansionary financial policy can positively affect sustainable growth. Considering the negative effect of expansionary monetary policy on sustainable economic development and due to sustainable economic sanctions, the most important priority should be given to providing resources for the banking system. To achieve sustainable economic development, government and state-owned companies are recommended to borrow less from banks, the government should pay more attention to the central bank, and the banks should be allowed to provide credit resources for productive enterprises under the supervision of the government. Also, exchange rate fluctuations have an unclear effect on sustainable economic development. Reforming the currency system and exchange rate should thus be one of the government's priorities. Due to the failure of the government to control the exchange rate during currency crises, the establishment of the currency exchange is beneficial for the economy and can prevent sudden jumps in the exchange rate. Finally, since the open trade policy has a positive effect on sustainable economic growth, a comprehensive export development program should be implemented by modifying and reinforcing both the macroeconomic environment and the institutional environment. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Sustainable economic development, Monetary policy, Financial policy, Currency policy, Trade policy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Imran, R. & Al-Imran, S. A. (2016). "Investigating the Effect of Monetary Policy and Financial Development on the Trade Balance of Iran". Financial Economics 11(38): 81-98. (In Persian) Ashraf Zadeh, S. H. R. & Rahmani, M. (2014). "The Effect of Monetary, Financial, Foreign Exchange and Commercial Policies on the Production, Export and Employment of Industries". Iranian Applied Economics Studies 4(15): 133-148. (In Persian) Aydın, B. & Igan, D. (2010). "Bank Lending in Turkey: Effects of Monetary and Fiscal Policies". International Monetary Fund Working Paper. Bakare-Aremu, T. A. & Osobase, A. O. (2015). "Effect of Fiscal and Monetary Policies on Industrial Sector Performance- Evidence from Nigeria". Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 6(17): 67-83. Belloumi, M. & Alshehry, A. (2020). "The Impact of International Trade on Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia". Sustainability 12: 5421. Brothers, A. & Zamardian, G. (2016). "Investigating the Effect of Monetary and Financial Policy Shocks on the Added Value of the Industry and Mining Sector in Iran". Investment Knowledge 6(24): 117-138. (In Persian) Chatziantoniou, I. Duffy. D. & Filis, G. (2013). "Stock Market Response to Monetary and Fiscal Policy Shocks: Multi-country evidence". Economic Modelling 30: 454-469. Delavari, M. & Karimi Kia, A. (2007). "Investigating the Impact of Fiscal Policy on Iran's Trade Balance with an Emphasis on Government Spending". Economic Research Quarterly 85: 145-174. (In Persian) Eze, O. R. & Ogiji, F. O. (2013). "Impact of Fiscal Policy on the Manufacturing Sector Output in Nigeria: An Error Correction Analysis". International Journal of Business and Management Review (IJBMR) 1(3): 35-55. Falade, O.E. & Folorunso, B.A. (2015). "Fiscal and Monetary Policy Instruments and Economic Growth Sustainability in Nigeria". American Journal of Economics 5(6): 587-594. doi: 10.5923/j.economics.20150506.04. Haffmann, M. Sondergaard, J. & Westelius, N. J. (2007). "The Timing and Magnitude of Exchange Rate Overshooting". Working Paper. Herman, D. (1996) Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, Boston: Beacon Press. Islam, M.S. Hossain, M.E. Chakrobortty, S. & Ema, N.S. (2022). "Does the Monetary Policy have Any Short-run and Long-run Effect on Economic Growth? A Developing and a Developed Country Perspective". Asian Journal of Economics and Banking 6(1): 26-49. Jafari Samimi, A. Tehranchian, I. & Balunjad Nouri, R. (2014). "The Effect of Monetary and Non-monetary Shocks on Production and Inflation in a Random Dynamic General Equilibrium Model in Open Economy Conditions: A Case Study of Iran's Economy". Iranian Economic Research Quarterly No. 11. (In Persian) Kamaan, C. K. (2014). "The Effect of Monetary Policy on Economic Growth in Kenya". International Journal of Business and Commerce 3(8): 11-24. Lasso de la Vega, M.C. &Urrutia, A.M. (2001). "HDPI: a Framework for Pollution-sensitive Human Development Indicators". Environment, Development and Sustainability (3): 199-215. Mahmood, T. & Sial, M. H. (2022). "The Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Economic Growth: A Case Study of Pakistan". Asian Economic and Financial Review 1(4): 236-244. Mallick, H. (2011). "Monetary Policy, Construction Sector Output and Housing Prices in India: an Emerging Economy Perspective". Applied Econometrics and International Development 11(1): 195-207. Motamedi, S. Zara-nejad, M. & Hojjat, A. H. (2012). "Investigating the Effect of Monetary and Financial Policies on Macro-Economic Indicators of Iran". Quantitative Economics Research Quarterly 10(3): 115-138. (In Persian) Obi, K. Oniore, J. & Nnadi, K. (2016). "The Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Economic Growth in Nigeria". Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 7(12). Orji, A. Ekeocha, D. Ogbuabor, J. & Anthony-Orji, O. (2022). "Monetary Policy Channels, Sectoral Outputs and Sustainable Growth in ECOWAS Region: A Rigorous Analysis and Implications for Policy". EconomiA. 10.1016/j.econ.2022.02.003. Rodrik, D. (2007). "One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth". One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Sobhanipour, M. Zare, H. & Ebrahimi, M. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Passive Monetary Policies on Stock Price Index (Using Markov Switching Model)". Development and Capital 7(2): 131-155. (In Persian) Taheri Fard, E. & Mousavi Azad, K. (2007). "The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy on Macroeconomic Variables in Iran". Journal of Economic Research 83(2). (In Persian) Tan, C-T. Mohamed, A. Habibullah, MS. & Chin, L. (2020). "The Impacts of Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Economic Growth in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand". South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 9(1): 114-130. Tomsik, V. (2012). "Some Insights into Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in the Czech Republic (BIS Paper, 67j)". Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2205639. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 689 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 647 |
||