ارزیابی ساختار و عملکرد چشماندازهای بیابانی با استفاده از تحلیل عملکرد چشمانداز و شاخصهای سنجش از دوری | ||
خشک بوم | ||
دوره 12، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 1401، صفحه 49-62 اصل مقاله (1.45 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.29252/aridbiom.2023.19284.1910 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سیدمهدی امیرآبادیزاده1؛ حسین بشری* 2؛ رضا جعفری2 | ||
1دانشآموخته کارشناسیارشد دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
2دانشیار، گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
در این مطالعه، ساختار و عملکرد مناطق اطراف تالاب بینالمللی گاوخونی با کلاسهای مختلف بیابانزایی با استفاده از روش تحلیل عملکرد چشمانداز (LFA) و شاخص نشت جهتدار گیاهی (CDLI) مستخرج از سنجنده OLI لندست 8 و شاخصهای گیاهی NDVI، SAVI-A، PD54 و STVI-1 ارزیابی و مقایسه گردید. در این تحقیق، 6 مکان مختلف انتخاب و در هر مکان، تعداد دو تا سه ترانسکت 50 متری مستقر شد. طول و عرض لکهها و فضای بینلکهای بهطور ممتد اندازهگیری و تعداد 11 شاخص سطحی در تمام لکههای اکولوژیک و فضای بینلکهها با سه تکرار ارزیابی گردید. نتایج نشان داد که معیارهای عملکردی پایداری و عناصر غذایی اختلاف معنیداری در میان مکانهای مطالعاتی نداشت ولی شاخص چرخه موادغذایی در مکانهای تاغکاریشده (Haloxylon ammodendron)، اشنانزار (Seidlitzia rosamrinus) و گَنگزار (Halocnmum strobilcaum) در مقایسه با سایر مکانها در سطح 5 درصد اختلاف معنیدار داشت. شاخصهای ساختاری و عملکردی در مناطق با کلاسهای مختلف بیابانزایی در سطح آماری 5 درصد با یکدیگر اختلاف معنیدار نداشتند. شاخص PD54 به علت تمایز بهتر میزان نشت منابع میان مکانهای مختلف، بهترین عملکرد را داشت و یک رابطة قوی بین این شاخص و شاخص نشت جهتدار گیاهی وجود داشت (%9/71=R2). همچنین رابطة منفی و معنیداری در سطح 5 درصد بین میزان نشت و درصد پوشش وجود داشت. مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که تلفیق روش LFA و شاخص نشت CDLI میتواند بطور مناسبی شرایط ساختاری و عملکردی اکوسیستمهای مناطق بیابانی را ارزیابی کند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
اکوسیستم بیابانی؛ پایداری؛ نفوذپذیری؛ چرخه مواد غذایی؛ لکه اکولوژیک؛ شاخصهای سنجش از دوری | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Evaluating structure and function of desert landscapes using Landscape Function Analysis and remote sensing indices | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Seyed Mehdi Amirabadizadeh1؛ Hossein Bashari2؛ Reza Jafari2 | ||
1Graduate of Desertification, Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the structure and function status of some areas with different desertification classes around Gavkhoni International Wetland using Landscape Function Analysis (LFA), and Cover Directional Leakiness Index (CDLI) extracted from Landsat 8 OLI sensor and NDVI, SAVI-A, PD54, and STVI-1 vegetation indices. In this research, six different areas were selected, and two or three transects with a length of 50 meters were established in each area. The length and width of the patches and inter-patches were continuously measured. Then 11 soil surface indicators were assessed in all ecological patches, and inter-patch areas with three replications. The results showed that although range places did not differ significantly in terms of soil stability and nutrient cycling indices, the infiltration index in the areas covered by Haloxylon ammodendron, Seidlitzia rosmarinus and Halocnemum strobilaceum varied significantly compared with the other areas (p < 0.05). According to the results, there were no significant differences between the structure and function indices in the areas with various desertification classes (p > 0.05). The PD54 index showed the best performance among vegetation indices due to its better differentiation of resource leakage between different areas, and it had a high relationship with CDLI (R2 = 71.9 %). There was a negative correlation between CDLI and vegetation cover percentage (p < 0.05). The present study indicated that integrating the results of LFA method with CDLI can be used to evaluate the structure and function status of desert ecosystems appropriately. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Desert ecosystem, Stability, Infiltration, Nutrient cycling, Ecological patch, Remote sensing indices | ||
مراجع | ||
[1]. Abedi, M., Arzani, H., Shahriari, A., Tongway, D., Aminzadeh, M. (2007). Evaluating structure and functions of vegetation patches in arid and semi-arid rangeland ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Studies, 40, 117-126. (in Farsi).
[2]. Ahmadi, Z., Heshmati, G.A., Abedi, M. (2009). Investigation the improvement operations affection on ecological indexes of rangeland health (Jahan Nama Garden, Golestan province). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 16(1), 55-65. (in Farsi).
[3]. Andalibi, L., Jafari, R., Bashari, H. (2012). Analysing the functionality of rangeland landscapes using TM sensor data (case study: Soh region, Isfahan-Iran). Rangeland, 6(2), 130-141. (in Farsi).
[4]. Andalibi, L., Jafari, R., and Bashari, H. (2013). Performance analysis of a remotely-sensed leakiness index for rangeland function assessment in semi-steppe rangelands of Isfahan province. Rangeland, 7(3), 238-247. (in Farsi).
[5]. Bainbridge, D.A. (2012). A guide for desert and dryland restoration: new hope for arid lands. Island press.
[6]. Bastin, G., Schmidt, M., O’Reagain, P., Karfs, R. (2010). Reporting change in landscape function using the Queensland ground cover index. In Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Conference of the Australian Rangeland Society.
[7]. Diez, E., McIntosh, B.S. (2011). Organizational drivers for, constraints on and impacts of decision and information support tool use in desertification policy and management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(3), 317-327.
[8]. Ebrahimi, Z., Vali, A., Khosroshahi, M., Ghazavi, R. (2017). Investigation of the role of bed dried Gavkhooni wetland on the production of the internal dust using remote sensing and duststorms (Case study: Isfahan province). Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 24(1), 152-164. (in Farsi).
[9]. Farazmand M., Jafari, R., Ramezani, N. (2014). Comparison the performance of vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis for mapping rangeland vegetation cover. Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 5(4): 105. (In Persian)
[10]. Huete, A.R., (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295-309.
[11]. Jafari, F., Bashari, H., Jafari, R. (2015). Evaluating structural and functional characteristics of various ecological patches in different range conditions (case study: semi-steppe rangeland of Aghche-Isfahan). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 3(10), 13-25. (in Farsi).
[12]. Jafari, R., & Bakhshandehmehr. L. (2013). Quantitative mapping and assessment of environmentally sensitive areas to desertification in central Iran. Land Degradation & Development, 27, 108-119.
[13]. Jafari, F., Jafari, R., Bashari, H. (2017). Assessing the performance of remotely sensed landscape function indices in semi-arid rangelands of Iran. Rangeland Journal, 39, 253-262.
[14]. Jozaqian, A., Bashari, H., Pahlavanravi, A., Ajorlo, M. (2016). The impacts of clay and gypsum mining on vegetation and soil conditions in arid ecosystems (case study: Segzi-Isfahan). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 5(15), 65-75. (in Farsi).
[15]. Khalasi, L., Heshmati, G.A. (2013). Evaluating different patches, using LFA method to control wind erosion (Case study: Hanitiyeh rangelands of Ahvaz city). Journal of Research Quarterly on Environmental Erosion Researches, 7, 44-56. (in Farsi).
[16]. Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. (2000). Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[17]. Lotfi-Anari, P., Heshmati, G.A. (2009). Calibration of Landscape Function Analysis method in an arid cold-season rangeland ecosystem in central part of Iran (case study: Mazraeamin rangeland, Yazd province). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 16(3), 386-400. (in Farsi).
[18]. Ludwig, J.A., Eager, R.W., Liedloff, A.C., Bastin, G.B., Chewings, V.H. (2006). A new landscape leakiness index based on remotely sensed ground-cover data. Ecological Indicators, 6, 327-336.
[19]. Maestre, F.T., Puche, M.D. (2009). Indices based on surface indicators predict soil functioning in Mediterranean semi-arid steppes. Applied Soil Ecology, 41, 342-350.
[20]. McDonald, S.E., Reid, N., Waters, C.M., Smith, R., Hunter, J. (2018). Improving ground cover and landscape function in a semi-arid rangeland through alternative grazing management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 268, 8-14.
[21]. Pickup, G., Chewings, V, Nelson, D.J. (1993). Estimating changes in vegetation cover over time in arid rangelands using Landsat MSS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 43(3), 243-263.
[22]. Pyke, D.A., Herrick, J.E., Shaver, P., Pellant, M. (2002). Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. Journal of Range Management, 55, 584–597.
[23]. Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Karami, G., Monfared, N. (2017). The geography of principle, concept and strategies of combating desertification: A learning for sustainable human development. Geography (Regional Planning), 7(3), 167-192. (in Farsi).
[24]. Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium (pp. 309 – 317). Washington: NASA, Scientific and Technical Information Office.
[25]. Safaei, M., Bashari, H., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Jafari, R. (2019). Assessing the impacts of land use and land cover changes on soil functions using landscape function analysis and soil quality indicators in semi-arid natural ecosystems. Catena, 177, 260-271.
[26]. Thenkabail, P.S., Ward, A.D., Lyon, J.G., Maerry, C.J. (1994). Thematic mapper vegetation indices for determining soybean and corn growth parameters. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(4): 437-442.
[27]. Tongway, D.J., Hindley, N. (2004). Landscape function analysis manual: procedures for monitoring and assessing landscapes with special reference to mine sites and rangelands. Canberra, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
[28]. Yari, R., Tavili, A., Zare, S. (2012). Investigation on soil surface indicators and rangeland functional attributes by Landscape Function Analysis (LFA) (case study: Sarchah Amari Birjand). Iranian journal of Range and Desert Research, 18(4), 624-636. (in Farsi). | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 297 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 248 |