تاثیر متفاوت تحریم بر تجارت خارجی با رویکرد مدل جاذبه، مطالعه موردی ایران و روسیه | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 14، شماره 27، فروردین 1401، صفحه 247-274 اصل مقاله (833.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2022.18064.2307 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| طه شیشه گری1؛ عباس معمارنژاد* 2؛ فرهاد غفاری3؛ سید شمس الدین حسینی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری رشته اقتصاد بین الملل،دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد،واحد علوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد،واحد علوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد ، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مطالعات بسیاری در خصوص تحریمهای اقتصادی و میزان اثرگذاری آنها بر وضعیت اقتصادی و رفاهی کشورهای هدف صورت گرفته است. اما تمام کشورهای هدف تحریم اقتصادی واکنش و تاثیرپذیری یکسانی از تحریمهای اقتصادی نداشتهاند. در این مطالعه به تفاوت اثرگذاری تحریمهای اقتصادی بر کشورهای مختلف با تمرکز بر وضعیت ایران و روسیه پرداخته شده است. با توجه به متفاوت بودن تحریمهای اقتصادی اعمال شده بر این دو کشور در ابتدا متغیر تحریم را کمی کرده تا پایهای یکسان برای تحلیل آماده شود و سپس با مقایسه اثرگذاری شدت تحریم بر میزان صادرات و واردات کشور هدف با شرکای تجاری مهم، اثر تحریم یکسان با استفاده از دادههای پنل به همراه متغیر مجازی تعاملی[1] برآورد شد. برای مدلسازی از مدل ارائه شده توسط رائول کاروسو در سال 2005 - که شکلی از معادله جاذبه میباشد- جهت بررسی اثرگذاری تحریم روی تجارت کشور هدف و دادههای تجارت ایران و روسیه با پنج شریک تجاری مهم در حد فاصل سالهای 1992 تا 2018 استفاده شده است. همچنین برای کمی کردن شدت تحریم از گزارش کنگره آمریکا در خصوص تحریمهای اعمالی علیه ایران و روسیه استفاده شده است. در نتایج مشاهده شد که تحریمهای اقتصادی اثر معکوس معنادار و قابل توجهی بر میزان تجارت کشور ایران با شرکای مهم تجاری خود دارد اما روی تجارت روسیه با شرکای خود اثر معناداری نداشته است. از آنجا که تحریم اقتصادی به عنوان شوک منفی به سیستمهای اقتصادی وارد میشود، علت تفاوت اثرگذاری تحریم اقتصادی بر دو کشور ایران و روسیه را با دو شاخص آسیبپذیری و تابآوری مرتبط دانسته و این دو شاخص را وارد مدل مینماییم. با وارد کردن دو شاخص تابآوری و آسیبپذیری به مدل کشور ایران مشاهده شد که تابآوری با اثرگذاری تحریم رابطه معکوس و آسیبپذیری با آن رابطه مستقیم دارد. این یافته مهم نشان میدهد که افزایش تابآوری و کاهش آسیبپذیری اقتصادی میتواند اثرگذاری تحریمهای اقتصادی بر ایران را کاهش دهد و از طرفی از آنجا که اقتصاد روسیه به نسبت ایران تابآوری بالاتر و آسیبپذیری کمتری دارد تاثیرگذاری متفاوت تحریم اقتصادی بر این دو کشور را نیز توجیه مینماید. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحریم اقتصادی؛ تابآوری؛ آسیبپذیری؛ ایران؛ روسیه؛ تجارت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Impacts of Sanctions on Foreign Trade Analyzed with the Gravity Model Approach: A Case Study of Iran and Russia | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Taha Shishegari1؛ Abbas Memarnejad2؛ Farhad Ghaffari3؛ Seyed Shamseddin Hoseini4 | ||
| 1PhD Student in Department of Economics, School of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch ,Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor Department of Economics, School of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor Department of Economics, School of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor Department of Business Economics , Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Economic sanctions are one of the tools to exert negative pressure on a country's economy to achieve political goals. They have been used in several cases in recent years due to their lower cost than war for the country that imposes them. What matters is the cost of economic sanctions for the imposing country and what it gains from it. The gain of sanctions for this country is the effects on the economy of the target country. Experimental observations show that, despite the same political disputes of different countries with one country (USA), the severity of sanctions imposed on these countries is different. Even despite the same sanctions imposed on the target countries, the economic responses of these countries to sanctions are different. Many studies have been conducted on economic sanctions and their impacts on the economic and welfare situation of the target countries. Not all of them have reacted the same way. In this article, we have discussed the differences in the impacts of economic sanctions on different countries, focusing on the situation of Iran and Russia. Due to the differences between the sanctions severity imposed on the two countries, the sanctions variable was initially quantified to provide an equal basis for our analysis. We entered resilience and vulnerability indices into our model to explain the different effects of the sanctions on the two countries. We also modeled the sanctions severity to consider the its differences in the case of different targets. Methodology: By comparing the effects of sanctions on the export and import of the target country to and from important trading partners, we estimated those effects using panel data with interactive dummy variables. The model proposed by Raul Caruso in 2005 was used to examine the impact of sanctions on the trade of the target countries. The trade data of Iran and Russia with five important partners between 1992 and 2018 were used in the model. We also used the US Congress report on the sanctions against Iran and Russia to quantify their sanctions. In the discussion of scoring sanctions, number zero is related to the period when no sanctions were imposed, numbers 1 and 2 are related to the mild and severe sanctions of the United States, numbers 3 and 4 are related to the mild and severe sanctions of Europe, and number 5 is intended for the sanctions imposed by the United Nations. Finally, by determining the severity of sanctions in different sectors of Iran's trade (different partners), we sought to show the effects using vulnerability and resilience as two indicators. Results and Discussion: he results showed that economic sanctions have had significant and negative effects on Iran's trade with its important partners, but they have had no significant effect on Russia's trade with its partners. Since economic sanctions enter the economic systems as a negative shock, the difference in their impacts is considered to be related to the indicators of vulnerability and resilience. It was observed that resilience has reverse and vulnerability has direct effects on sanctions. This important finding shows that, by modifying resilience and vulnerability, we can affect the impacts of sanctions. Increasing resilience and reducing vulnerability can reduce the impact of economic sanctions on Iran. On the other hand, since Russia's economy is more resilient and less vulnerable than Iran, the difference between the impacts of economic sanctions on these two countries is explicable. Conclusion: In this study, we tried to examine the reason for the differences in the impact of economic sanctions on different target countries. We focused on Iran and Russia because of the similarities in the nature of the exports and political disputes with Western countries. For the severity of sanctions imposed on the target countries, we used six levels (0-5). We also considered the trade of Iran with five important partners (i.e., Germany, China, India, Turkey and UAE) and Russia Trade with its partners (Netherland, China, Belarus, Germany and Turkey) as an index for measuring the sanctions impacts. It emerged that the sanctions have had significant negative effects on Iran's trade with its important trading partners, but thet have had no significant effects on Russia's trade. We entered resilience and vulnerability indices into our model to explain the difference of the effects on the trades of Iran and Russia. It was observed that the impact of sanctions is inversely related to resilience and directly related to vulnerability of an economy, meaning that the higher the resilience and the less vulnerable a country is, the less affected by sanctions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Economic sanctions, Resilience, Vulnerability, Iran, Russia, Trade | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abounoori, E. & Lajevardi, H. (2017). "Estimating Composite Vulnerability and Resilience Index of Iranian Economy". Journal of Economics & Modelling 7(28): 1-29. Afesorgbor, S. K. (2019). "The Impact of Economic Sanctions on International Trade: How do Threatened Sanctions Compare with Imposed Sanctions?". European Journal of Political Economy 56: 11-26. Allen, S. H. (2005). "The Determinants of Economic Sanctions’ Success and Failure". International Interactions 31(2): 117-138. Amiri, H. Pirdadeh Beyranvand, M. Norouzi Amogin, F. & Alizadeh, S. (2018). "Estimation Vulnerability and Resilience Indicators in Iran Economy". Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies 6(23): 434-455. Azarbayejani, K. Tayebi, S. K. & Safa Dargiri, H. (2015). "The Effect of US and EU Economic Sanctions on Bilateral Trade Flows between Iran and Its Major Trading Partners: An Application of Gravity Model". Journal of Tahghighat-e-Eghtesadi 50(3): 539-562. Biersteker, T. & Van Bergeijk, P. A. (2015). "How and When do Sanctions Work? The Evidence". On Target 17-28. Briguglio, L. Cordina, G. Farrugia, N. & Vella, S. (2009). "Economic Vulnerability and Resilience: Concepts and Measurements". Oxford Development Studies 37(3): 229-247. Caruso, R. (2003). "The Impact of International Economic Sanctions on Trade: An Empirical Analysis". Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 9(2): 1-36. Dizaji, S. F. & Van Bergeijk, P. A. (2013). "Potential Early Phase Success and Ultimate Failure of Economic Sanctions: A VAR Approach with an Application to Iran". Journal of Peace Research 50(6): 721-736. Elliott. K. A. (1998). "The Sanctions Glass: Half Full or Completely Empty?". International Security 23(1): 50-65. Frank, J. (2018). "The Effects of Economic Sanctions on Trade: New Evidence from a Panel PPML Gravity Approach".. Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences (No. 17-2018). Haidar, J. I. (2017). "Sanctions and Export Deflection: Evidence from Iran". Economic Policy 32(90): 319-355. Hufbauer, G. C. Elliott, K. A. Cyrus, T. & Winston, E. (1997). "US Economic Sanctions: Their Impact on Trade, Jobs, and Wages". (No. Working Paper Special (2)). Kazerooni, A. Asgharpour, H. & khezri, A. (2016). "The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Composition of Major Trade Partners of Iran (1992-2013)". Iraninan Jouornal of Trade Studies 20(79): 1-34. Khan, S. & Khan, D. (2013). "An Empirical Analysis of Pakistan's Bilateral Trade: A Gravity Model Approach". Romanian Economic Journal 16(48): 103-120. Lamotte, O. (2012). "Disentangling the Impact of Wars and Sanctions on International Trade: Evidence from Former Yugoslavia". Comparative Economic Studies 54(3): 553-579. Larch, M. Shikher, S. Syropoulos, C. & Yotov, Y. V. (2022). "Quantifying the Impact of Economic Sanctions on International Trade in the Energy and Mining Sectors". Economic Inquiry 60(3): 1038-1063. Lewer, J. J. & Van den Berg, H. (2008). "A Gravity Model of Immigration". Economics Letters 99(1): 164-167. McLean, E. V. & Whang, T. (2010). "Friends or Foes? Major Trading Partners and the Success of Economic Sanctions". International Studies Quarterly 54(2): 427-447. Mehchy, Z. Nasser, R. & Schiffbauer, M. (2015). "Trade Determinants and Potential of Syria: Using a Gravity Model ‘with an Estimation of the Syrian Crisis’ Impact on Exports". Middle East Development Journal 7(2): 226-251. Rahman, M. M. & Dutta, D. (2012). "The Gravity Model Analysis of Bangladesh's Trade: a Panel Data Approach". Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 13(3): 263-286. Shirazi, H. Azarbaiejani, K. & Sameti, M. (2016). "The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Iran's Exports". Iranian Economic Review 20(1): 111-124. Torbat, A. E. (2005). "Impacts of the US Trade and Financial Sanctions on Iran". World Economy 28(3): 407-434. Van Bergeijk, P. (1995). "The Impact of Economic Sanctions in the 1990s". The World Economy 18(3): 443-455. Yang, J. Askari, H. Forrer, J. & Zhu, L. (2009). "How Do US Economic Sanctions Affect EU's Trade with Target Countries?". World Economy 32(8): 1223-1244. Ziyaee Bigdeli, M. T. Gholami, E. & Tahmasebi Boldaji, F. (2013). "The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Trade in Iran An Application of Gravity Model". Journal of Economics Research 13(48): 109-119. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,102 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,349 |
||