درآمدی بر شناسایی پراکنش توسعهیافتگی در افغانستان با کمک تکنیک تاپسیس اقلیدسی | ||
| سیاست گذاری اقتصادی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 14، شماره 28، مهر 1401، صفحه 21-48 اصل مقاله (823.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/epj.2022.18804.2342 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ولی محمد فائز1؛ سید محمد باقر نجفی* 2؛ محمد شریف کریمی2؛ جمال فتح اللهی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| 3استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از مسائل مهم کشور افغانستان پراکنش نابرابر توسعهیافتگی در بین ولایات مختلف افغانستان است. توسعهیافتگی بر اساس معیارهای مختلفی مانند سطح درآمد، سطح سواد و تحصیلات، بهداشت، زیرساختهای فیزیکی و ارتباطی و غیره قابل سنجش است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی اختلاف سطح توسعهیافتگی در کشور افغانستان برای دو مقطع زمانی 1394 و 1398 انجام شد. برای این منظور، رویکرد سه مرحلهای شامل انتخاب شاخصهای توسعه، محاسبه درجه توسعهیافتگی ولایات و تجزیه و تحلیل تغییرات منطقهای با استفاده از تکنیک تاپسیس اقلیدسی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان میدهد؛ 1) ولایت کابل در هر دو مقطع زمانی در رتبه نخست توسعهیافتگی قرار گرفته است. 2) درجه توسعهیافتگی کابل در سال 1398 نسبت به 1394 با کاهش مواجه بوده است و از عدد یک به مقدار 5280/0 رسیده است. کاهش درجه توسعهیافتگی در سایر ولایات افغانستان نیز به غیر از ولایت کندز، هرات و هلمند، رخ داده است. 3) به طور کلی میتوان گفت، وضعیت توسعهیافتگی این کشور بهبود نیافته است. چرا که میانگین توسعهیافتگی ولایات افغانستان در مقطع سال 1398 نسبت به سال 1394 افزایش نیافته و انحراف معیار توسعهیافتگی این کشور نیز کاهش نیافته است. 4) شکاف بین پیشرفتهترین و عقبماندهترین ولایات بیشتر شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| توسعه؛ نابرابری؛ تاپسیس؛ افغانستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification of the distribution of development in Afghanistan using the Euclidean TOPSIS technique | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Vali Mohammad Fayez1؛ Seyyed Mohammad Baqer Najafi2؛ Mohammadsharif Karimi2؛ Jamal Fathollahi3 | ||
| 1PhD student in Economics, Razi University, Kermanshah | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Economic Department, Razi University, Kermanshah | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Economics Department, Razi University, Kermanshah | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: One of the first steps towards sustainable development is to establish equality between and within generations. In other words, sustainable development requires improving the welfare of the poor people of the society to reduce inequality. Inequality makes it difficult to achieve development in different ways such as the destruction of capital and social cohesion and the weakening of national security. This is because it prevents political stability. Moreover, inequality has a serious negative effect on the development of society by preventing capital formation and human development. Economic equality has a higher importance in countries with ethnic and religious diversity like Afghanistan. It has a major role in destroying the social cohesion of the society. On the one hand, the incentive for inequality of opportunities increases the interests and benefits of the governing groups, and, on the other hand, inequality is considered immoral and attributed to privileged groups and their rent-seeking. One of the important issues in Afghanistan seems to be the unequal distribution of development among different provinces of the country. Therefore, the first step in planning regional development and achieving more balanced growth and development in Afghanistan is to investigate the current situation of different provinces according to the degree of their development. The present research aims to investigate the difference in the level of development in Afghanistan in 2015 and 2019. Development can be measured based on various criteria such as income, literacy, education, health, physical and communication infrastructure. Thus, the degree of development in Afghanistan's provinces was examined by combining different criteria whose data could be accessed. Methodology: This study provided a new methodological instrument to supervise the development process of different areas in Afghanistan. The differences in the development level of 34 provinces of Afghanistan were examined by a three-step approach, including the selection of the development indicators, calculation of the degree of development in the provinces, and analysis of regional changes. Therefore, the TOPSIS technique, which is a ranking method, was used to understand the level of development and their spatial equality. It should be noted that the TOPSIS technique is a practical instrument to select and rank different alternatives. The data about the indicators were collected from the statistics of the World Bank, the United Nations, and the Central Bureau of Statistics and Information of Afghanistan. Results and Discussion: According to the results, Kabul Province had the first rank of development in both periods. The development of Kabul decreased in 2019 compared to 2015 and reached 0.5280 from one. The level of development also decreased in other provinces of Afghanistan, except for Kunduz, Herat, and Helmand. The classification of Afghanistan's provinces into developed, developing, and underdeveloped categories indicates that only Kabul is a developed province. Most of the provinces of Afghanistan are in the developing category with a short distance from the underdeveloped ones. The changes in many provinces included in this category are similar to those in Kabul Province, but they cannot improve their conditions or maintain their previous situation. In general, development has not improved in this country considering that the average development of the provinces did not increase in 2019 compared to 2015, and the standard deviation of the country's development did not decrease either. As the gap between the most developed and the least developed provinces increases, the intensity of regional inequality and imbalance increases too. Conclusion: According to the results, the policies adopted in Afghanistan did not improve the initial unequal conditions; rather, it worsened them. What has been achieved in limited areas has not penetrated to the bottom and has only been intensified through creating divisions in the center-periphery situation. Most of the small material and physical resources are concentrated in Kabul Province, and the severe poverty of the surrounding provinces has been neglected. However, the severe economic inequality between urban and rural areas and the center and periphery is only one example of the inequality that this country is faced with. Inequality can also be proposed and investigated in other areas such as social status and acceptability, power, working conditions, accessibility to job opportunities, and the selection right, which requires further research. To reduce poverty and inequality, it is necessary to pay attention to development programs. In this regard, planning for easier and fairer access to health and treatment facilities and primary education is very helpful. The expansion of educational and health services in poor areas helps to break the cycle of poverty and reduce inequalities by increasing their capabilities. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Development, Inequality, TOPSIS, Afghanistan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afghanistan Forest Infarmation and Data (2010). Mongabay. www.khama.com. Alkire, S. Roche, J. M. Ballon, P. Foster, J. Santos, M. E. & Seth, S. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis, Oxford University Press, USA. Asghari Zadeh, E. L. & Zabihi Jamkhaneh, M. (2013). "The Evaluation and Ranking of Rural Development Level Using Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods (Case Study: Rural Districts in Sari County)". Journal of Research and Rural Planning 3: 4-27. Asgharpour, M. J. (2018). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Tehran: Tehran University Press. Balcerzak, A. P. & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). "Application of TOPSIS Method for Analysis of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries". Institute of Economic Research Working Papers No. 22/2016. Chalabi, M. (1996). Sociology of Order: Description and Theoretical Analysis of Social Order, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. Coronicova Hurajova, J. & Hajduova, Z. (2021). "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using TOPSIS and WSA Method for Quality of Life: The Case of Slovakia Regions". Mathematics 9(2440). https:// doi.org/10.3390/math9192440. Dai, X. & Zhang, J. (2011). "The TOPSIS Analysis on Regional Disparity of Economic Development in Zhejiang Province". Canadian Social Science 7(5): 135-139. Ding, T. Liang, L. Yang, M. & Wu, H. (2016). "Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Cross-Evaluation with Uncertain Decision Parameters". Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2016, Article ID 4313247, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4313247. Doyle, M. & Stiglitz, J. (2014). "Eliminating Extreme Inequality: A Sustainable Development Goal, 2015–2030". Ethics & International Affairs 28(1): 5-13. Dymova, L. Sevastjanov, P. & Tikhonenko, A. (2013). "A Direct Interval Extension of TOPSIS Method". Expert Systems with Applications 40(12): 4841-4847. Fanni, Z. Khakpour, B. A. & Heydari, A. (2014). "Evaluating the Regional Development of Border Cities by TOPSIS Model (Case Study: Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Iran)". Sustainable Cities and Society 10: 80-86. Ghaffaryfard, M. (2019). "Review the Process of Development Policy and Regional Balance during Development Plans in Iran (SWOT Approach)". Strategic Studies of Public Policy 9(30): 21-41. Ghiasvand, A. & Moezifar, H. (2010). "Comparison of the Methods of Determining the Degree of Development of the Cities of South Khorasan Province". Financial Economics 5(17): 164-188. Heydarpour, B. Daniyali, T. & Estelaji, A. (2019). "Investigating and Explaining the Situation of the Villages of Islamshahr City in Terms of Rural Development Challenges". New Perspectives Quarterly in Human Geography 12(3): 129-148. Hunt, D. (1989). Economic Theories of Development: An Analysis of Competing Paradigms, Translator: Gholamreza Azad (Aramaki), Tehran: nashreney, 2019. Imani, B. (2018). "Assessment of Developmental Levels in Ardabil Villages by Utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods". Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning 12(41): 821-836. Latuszynska, A. (2014). "Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis using TOPSIS Method for Interval Data in Research into the Level of Information Society Development". Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 13(2): 63-76. Lotfi, H. (2016). "Political Management Based on the Sustainable Development of Regional Inequalities in the Distribution Space for the Three Provinces of Khorasan". Journal of Greate Khorasan 7(24): 75-90. Mobasher Amini, M. (2018). "Study of Spatial Separation and the Concentration of Poverty in Residential Neighborhoods of 13 District Municipality of District 12". Journal of Social Research 10(37): 71-85. Molaey Hashjin, N. & Alinaghipour, M. (2020). "On the Evaluation of Development Levels by Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques in the Parts of Guilan Province". Human Geography Research Quarterly 52(1): 75-87. Doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2018.233904.1007465. Momeni, M. (2019). New Topics of Research in Operations, Tehran: Nashr-e Moalef. Mosayyebzadeh, A. Mozafari Niya, A. & Shabestar, M. (2022). "Analysis of Spatial Inequalities and Assessing of Regional Development Statuse in The Provinces of Iran". Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies 10(40): 71-84. National Statistics and Information Authority (NSIA). (2020). Afghanistan Statistical Yearbook 2020. https://newsmedia.tasnimnews.com/Tasnim/Uploaded/Document/1400/01/31/140001311234299482260266.pdf. Nouri, A. Pourshikhian, A. Asghari, H. & Shahmari, R. (2022). "Ranking of District 13 areas based on Green City Indicators using Multivariate Decision Models (TOPSIS)". Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planing) 12(3): 62-83. Petrović, J. Radukić, S. & Radović, M. (2020). "A Multicriteria Analysis on Regional Disparity of Economic and Demographic Development in the Republic of Serbia". Economic Themes 58(3): 327-342. Productive Afghanistan Strategy -Dari Version (2019). Ministry of Economy, Afghanization Commercialization, Industrialization. Sajadian, N. & Ekrami, N. (2018). "Assessing the Degree of Development in the Country’s Border Provinces Using Development Indicators through Numerical Taxonomy and TOPSIS Models". Amayesh Journal 11(41): 47-70. Salimifar, M. Nourouzi, R. A. & Motahari, M. A. (2010). "Measuring Industrial and Regional Development of Razavi, Southern and Northern Khorasan Provinces". Economic Research 9(4): 175- 196. Sarafi, M. (2000). Basics of Regional Development Planning. Regional Planning and Planning Office, Tehran: Publications of the Organization of Management and Planning of the Country, Second Edition. Seers, D. (1969). "The Meaning of Development". IDS Communication 44. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Shishebori, D. & Farahbakhsh, E. (2021). "Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis and TOPSIS in the Organizational Excellence Model with the Aim of Emphasizing and Improving the Performance of Human Resources (Case Study: Shahid Bahonar Copper Industries, Kerman)". Journal of Fuzzy Systems and Applications 4(1): 189-199. DOI: 10.22034/JFSA.2021.140198. Tinbergen, J. (1984). Central Planning, Translator: Ahmed Azimi Bolourian, Planning and Budget Organization. Tehran: Center for Economic-Social Documents. Todaro, Michael P. & Smith, Stephen C. (2014). Economic development, Translated by Vahid Mahmoudi, Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications, Second Edition. UNDP. (2022). Human Development Index (HDI), available at: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI. June, 18, 2022. Vaggi, G. (2018). Development: The Re-balancing of Economic Powers, Springer. 172 pages. ISBN: 978-3-319-54878-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54879-1 Vakilipour, S. Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. Ghodousi, M. Choi, S.-M. (2021). "Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels". Sustainability 13(7): 4067. Wang, Y. J. Lee, H. S. and Lin, K. (2003). "Fuzzy TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision Making". International Mathematical Journal 3: 367-379. WCED (1987). Our Common Future, New York: Oxford University Press. World Bank (2021). available at: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/indicator. World Health Organization (2016). World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals, World Health Organization. Zarifian, Sh. & Latifi, S. (2018). "A Comparative Study of Application of MADM Techniques in Measurement of Rural Development Level in Hamadan Province of Iran". Journal of Village and Development 21(2): 29-53. Dor: 20.1001.1.15633322.1397.21.2.2.0. Zavadskas, E. K. Mardani, A. Turskis, Z. Jusoh, A. & Nor, K. M. (2016). "Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems—an Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015." International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 15(3): 645-682. Zayari, K. (2017). Regional Planning Principles and Methods, Tehran: Tehran University Press. Eighth edition. Zayari, K. Hajibabaei, S. & Zakerhaghighi, K. (2022). "Analysis of Smart Urban Growth Indicators Using Topsis Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model (Case Study: Hamadan City)". Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal 11(42): 127-142. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 558 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 450 |
||