سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه یزد

ایمانی, بهرام, یاری, ارسطو, پاکباز بهبودی, فرشته. (1401). بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‎پذیری در مناطق روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب. کاوش‌نامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی, 10(2), 67-79. doi: 10.22034/grd.2022.13069.1342
بهرام ایمانی; ارسطو یاری; فرشته پاکباز بهبودی. "بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‎پذیری در مناطق روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب". کاوش‌نامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی, 10, 2, 1401, 67-79. doi: 10.22034/grd.2022.13069.1342
ایمانی, بهرام, یاری, ارسطو, پاکباز بهبودی, فرشته. (1401). 'بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‎پذیری در مناطق روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب', کاوش‌نامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی, 10(2), pp. 67-79. doi: 10.22034/grd.2022.13069.1342
ایمانی, بهرام, یاری, ارسطو, پاکباز بهبودی, فرشته. بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‎پذیری در مناطق روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب. کاوش‌نامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی, 1401; 10(2): 67-79. doi: 10.22034/grd.2022.13069.1342

بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‎پذیری در مناطق روستایی مورد مطالعه: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب

کاوش های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی
مقاله 7، دوره 10، شماره 2، آبان 1401، صفحه 67-79    اصل مقاله (1.05 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/grd.2022.13069.1342
نویسندگان
بهرام ایمانی* 1؛ ارسطو یاری2؛ فرشته پاکباز بهبودی3
1دانشیار گروه برنامه ریز ی شهری و روستایی دانشگاه محقق اردبیل، اردبیل، ایران
2دانشیار گروه برنامه‌ریزی شهری و روستایی. دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی. دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
چکیده
وجود خطراتی مانند رشد سریع جمعیت، از بین رفتن زمین‌های کشاورزی و فضاهای باز، کمبود مسکن مناسب، افزایش نابرابری‌های اجتماعی بین مناطق شهری و روستایی و از بین رفتن حس تعلق به مکان در روستاها، کیفیت زندگی جوامع روستایی را مورد تهدید قرار داد و به دنبال آن زیست‌پذیری در کانون توجه قرار گرفت و رشد نمود. با توجه به اهمیت موضوع، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست‌پذیری مناطق روستایی انجام شده است. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و بر اساس ماهیت توصیفی- تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری 18 روستای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب با 1170خانوار می‌باشد. حجم نمونه مورد مطالعه بر اساس فرمول کوکران 289 نفر برآورد گردید. پراکندگی تعداد نمونه‌‌ها در سطح روستاهای مورد مطالعه به صورت طبقه‌ای و بر اساس تعداد خانوار آنها می‌باشد. جهت تحلیل موضوع در بعد اجتماعی از شش شاخص در قالب 33 نماگر، در بعد اقتصادی در پنج شاخص در قالب 23 نماگر و در بعد محیطی از سه شاخص در قالب 10 نماگر بهره گرفته شد. روایی پرسشنامه توسط پانل صاحبنظران متخصص و مجرب مورد تأیید گردید. ضریب پایایی کل زیست‌پذیری بر اساس آلفای کرونباخ 87/0 محاسبه گردید. نتایج یافته‌ها بر اساس آزمون t تک نمونه‌ای بیانگر این است که میزان زیست‌پذیری روستاها در سطح ضعیفی قرار دارد و در تمام ابعاد زیست‌پذیری میانگین بدست‌آمده در سطح پایین‌تری از حد نرمال قرار دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
زیست‌پذیری؛ توسعه روستایی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ شهرستان فاریاب
عنوان مقاله [English]
Measurement and Evaluation Livelihoods in rural areas Case study: villages of central part of Faryab city
نویسندگان [English]
Bahram Imani1؛ arastoo yari2؛ fereshteh pakbaz behbodi3
1Assistant professor of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil.Iran
2Associate Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Mohaghegh Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran
3MA student of Geography and Rural Planning, Mohaghegh Ardebili University, Ardebil, Iran
چکیده [English]
There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal.
There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal.
There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal.
There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Sustainability, Rural Development, Sustainable Development, Faryab County
مراجع
  • Afarakhta, H., Jalalian, H., Anuri, A., Manochehri, A. (2016). “Analysis of the role of social capital in the viability of integrated villages in the city of Miandoab”. Rural Development Strategies, 3 (4): 415-441, (in Farsi).
  • Anabestani, A. A., Moini, A. (1400). “the effect of spatial identity on the livability of peri-urban rural settlements in the metropolis of Mashhad”. Space Geographic Survey, 11 (39): 69-90, (in Farsi).
  • Argent, N., Tonts, M., Jones, R., Holmes, J. (2009). “Rural Amenity and Rural Change in Temperate Australia: Implications for Development and Sustainability”. Journal for Geography, 4 (2): 15-28.
  • Asadpour, Z. )2015). Investigating the effects of tourism development on the quality of life in rural areas (case study: Creek village, Dana city). master's thesis, supervisor: Bahram Imani, Mohaghegh Ardabili Universit, (in Farsi).
  • Badland, H., Whitzman, L. A., Butterworth, H. (2014). “Urban Liveability: Emering Lesson from Australian For Exploring the Potential for Indicators to Measure the Social Determinants of Health”. Social Science and Medicine, 111: 64-73.
  • Faiz, A., Faiz, A., Wang, W., Bennet, Ch. (2012). “Sustainable Rural Rods for Livelihalk, And Livability”. Journal Procedie-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53: 1-8.
  • General Population and Housing Census of Kerman Province, (2015). Iran Statistics Center, Iran.
  • Ghaffarian Behrman, M., Prizadi, T., Shamai, A., Khatibizadeh, M. R., Shaheswar, A. (2016). “Spatial analysis of livability of urban neighborhoods (Study case: District 18 of Tehran)”. Environmental Research, 7 (14): 45-58, (in Farsi).
  • Ghanbari, A., Roknuddin Eftekhari, A. R. (2013). “an article investigating the effects of improving and renovating rural housing in making rural settlements livable, a case study: North Deh Pir village of Khorram Abad city”. the first national conference on sustainable development in the sciences of geography and planning, architecture and urban planning, 1-11, (in Farsi).
  • Gough, M. (2015). “Reconciling Livability and Sustainability: Conceptual and Practical Implications for Planning”. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35 (2): 145-160.
  • Hankins, Katherine B. (2009). “The Disappearance of The State From “Livable” Urban Spaces”. Antipode, 41 (5): 845–866.
  • Heydari, M.T., Shamai, A., Sasanpour, F., Soleimani, M., Ahdanjad Roshni, M. (2016). “analysis of factors affecting the livability of dilapidated urban tissues, case study: dilapidated tissue of the central part of Zanjan city”. Geographical Space, 17 (57): 1-25, (in Farsi).
  • Idrus, Sh., Hadi, A. S., Harman Shah, A. H., Mohamed, A. F. (2008). “Spatial Urban Metabolism for Livable City”. Blueprints for Sustainable Infrastructure Conference, 1-13.
  • Isalo, A. A., Bayat, M., Bahrami, A. A. (2013). “concepts of livability, a new approach to improve the quality of life in rural communities, case study: Qom city”. Kohk district, housing and rural environment, 146: 107-120, (in Farsi).
  • Jumapour, M., Tahmasabi Tehrani, Sh. (2012). “explaining the livability and quality of life in peri-urban villages, case study: Central part of Shahryar city”. physical-spatial planning, 1 (3): 49-60, (in Farsi).
  • Karagozlu, H., Shoghi, M. (2017). “evaluation of livability levels in rural areas, case study: Kaki district of Dashti”. Geography and Human Relations, 1 (3): 354-368, (in Farsi).
  • Khorasani, M. A., Rezvani, M. R. (2012). “measuring and evaluating livability components in rural settlements around the city, case study: Varamin city”. rural development, 5 (1): 89-110, (in Farsi).
  • Khorasani, M. A., Rezvani, M., Matiei Langroudi, S. H., Rafiyan, M. (2012). “measuring and evaluating the livability of peri-urban villages, case study: Varamin city”. Rural Researches, 3 (12): 85-110, (in Farsi).
  • Khorasani, M.A., Akbarian Ronizi, S. R. (2019). “assessment of livability in rural areas of Pirashhari, case study: central part of Shiraz city”. Regional Planning, 10 (40): 133-146, (in Farsi).
  • Larice, M. Z. (2005). “Great Neighborhoods: The Livability and Morphology High Density Neighborhoods in Urban North America”. PhD thesis in University of California, Berkeley.
  • Lau Leby J. Hashim, A. H. (2010). “Liveability Dimensions and Attributes: Their Relative Importan The Eyes of Neighbourhood Resid Dents”. Journal of Construchion In Developing Countries, 15 (1): 67-91.
  • Litman, T. A. (2004). “Economic Value of Walkability, World Transport Policy & Practice”. 10 (1): 5-14.
  • Lotfi, S., Koohsari, M. J. (2009). “Measuring Objective Accessibility to Neighborhood Facilities in The City, A Case Study: Zone6 In Tehran”. l26: 133-140.
  • Mohammadi Ostadkalaye, A., Khorasani, M. A., Pehlvanzadeh, H. (2016). “analysis and measurement of the effects of resettlement on the livability of rural communities, case study: flooded villages in the east of Golestan province”. Village Housing and Environment, 160: 59-70, (in Farsi).
  • Rashidi Ebrahim Hissari, A., Movahed, A., Tolai, S., Mousavi, M. (2015). “spatial analysis of Tabriz metropolitan area with livability approach”. Ahar Geographical Space, 16 (54): 155-176, (in Farsi).
  • Sadeghlou, T., Sejasi Khedari, H. (2013). investigating the relationship between the livability of rural settlements and resilience against natural hazards in the rural areas of Merah Tepe and Palisan villages”. Crisis Management, 6: 37-44, (in Farsi).
  • Sejasi Kedari; H., Rumiani, A., Sanei, S. (2016). “investigating the effects of the implementation of rural leadership projects on the livability of local communities, case study: Gilvan and Chorzak villages in Zanjan province”. Spatial Planning, 6 (2): 75-96, (in Farsi).
  • Sheikhul-Islami, A., Kiani, S., Hatamiani, V. (2016). “Analysis of the livability of villages around the city, case study: Drood city”. International Congress on Construction, Architecture and Contemporary World Urbanism, 1-10, (in Farsi).
  • Southworth, M. (2011). “Measuring the Livable City”. Built Environment, 29 (4): 343-354.
  • Upadhyay, P. (2016). “Envisaged for Sustainable Rural Development: Viability and Challenges of Rural Tourism in Nepal”. Repositioning, 1(1): 37-52.
  • Usdot (United States Department of Transportation). (2009). Partnership Sets Forth Six Livability Principles’ to Coordinate Policy, Press Release. Us Department of Transportation, Office of Public Affairs, Dot 80-0916 June 2009. Dot.Gov/Affairs/2009/Dot8009.Htm.
  • Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Yu, M. (2019). “Evaluation and Determinants of Satisfaction with Rural Livability in China’s Less-Developed Eastern Areas: A Case Study of Xianju County in Zhejiang Province”. Ecological Indicators, 104: 711- 722.
  • Wheeler, M. (2001). Planning Sustainable and Livability Cities, Stephen 20. www. Cam Sys. Com|Kh Experts-Livability. Htms.
  • Yang, S. (2011). “A Livable City Study in China: Using Structural Equation Models”. Thesis Submitted in Statistics, Department of Statistics Uppsala University.
  • Zanganeh, M., Khavari, A., Bani Asad, T. (2017). “measuring and evaluating the livability of urban settlements in border areas, case study: Torbat Jam”. Shahr Paydar, 1 (2): 31-46, (in Farsi).

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,046
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 655