مدل پارادایمی مدیریت نواحی مادرشهری با استفاده از نظریه تئوری زمینه ای نمونه موردی: ناحیه ی مادرشهری مشهد | ||
| کاوش های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 1401، صفحه 65-83 اصل مقاله (578.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ستاره تازه دل1؛ سیدمسلم سیدالحسینی* 2؛ اسماعیل شیعه3؛ کیومرث حبیبی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، گروه شهرسازی، واحد امارات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دبی، امارات متحده عربی | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران | ||
| 3استاد گروه شهرسازی، واحد تهران غرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| چکیده نواحی مادرشهری باید قلمروهای متنوعی را مدیریت کنند و مدیریت آنها فراتر از مدیریت محلی است. روابط و پیوندهای بین عناصر و فعالیتها تا حدی بدون مرز و پیچیده است و هدایت آن نیازمند مدیریتی در سطح منطقهای خواهد بود. این مقاله با هدف تدوین مدلی برای مدیریت یکپارچهی ناحیهی مادرشهری مشهد انجام شده است. روش تحقیقی این مقاله نوع نظریهی زمینهای است. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات مصاحبهی نیمهساختاریافته است. جامعهی آماری خبرگان و متخصصین حوزهی مدیریت شهری مشهد درنظرگرفته شده است. روش نمونهگیری ترکیبی هدفمند است؛ که از ترکیب دو روش معیاری و گلولهبرفی شناسی شدهاند. روش تحلیل دادههای مصاحبه نیز به صورت تفسیری میباشد و از نرم افزار Atlas-Ti استفاده شده است. همچنین برای اولویتبندی مولفههای منتج شده از مدل از روش SWARA که یکی از روشهای تصمیمگیری چند معیاره است استفاده میشود. ابزار گرآوری در این بخش پرسشنامه است. یافتههای مصاحبه 12 مولفهی اصلی و 4 مولفه محوری را برای دستیابی به مدیریت یکپارچه در ناحیهی مادرشهری مشهد شناسایی کردند. مولفههای طرحهای ملی و منطقهای، قوانین و مقررات، پویایی قوانین متناسب با مسایل موجود و مشارکت انواع بخشهای مدنی و خصوصی، دولتی و عمومی، مهمترین عوامل موثر در دستیابی به مدیریت یکپارچهی ناحیهی مادرشهری مشهد هستند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تفرق مدیریتی؛ ناحیه ی مادرشهری؛ مدیریت یکپارچه؛ نظریه ی زمینه ای؛ SWARA | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Paradigm model of management of metropolitan areas using grounded theory Case study: metropolitan district of Mashhad | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| setareh tazehdel1؛ seyed moslem seyedolhosseini2؛ esmail shieh3؛ kiomars habibi4 | ||
| 1Department of Urban Planning, UAE Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates | ||
| 2, Associate Professor at Department of Urban Design & Development,Art & Architecture Faculty, Mashhad Branch,Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Faculty Member Islamic Azad University, West Branch of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor, Faculty of Kurdistan University,sanandaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Management and planning at the level of metropolitan areas can not be limited to the boundaries of the city (Rahmani, 2013); Because metropolitan areas have to manage diverse domains (Pirlone, 2017). The management of Iranian metropolitan in the main city and surrounding settlements (urban and rural areas) is separate and the organization is not responsible for coordination between organizations and municipalities. The management of these areas is limited to the program and plan level only. The metropolitan area of Mashhad suffers from disorder due to managerial divisions in the region. This study aims to develop a model for integrated management of Mashhad metropolitan area and seeks to answer the question of what factors should be considered to achieve managerial integration at the level of Mashhad metropolitan area? In the following, the components obtained from the final model will be prioritized. Methodology This research has been done in two stages. In the first stage, the integrated management model of Mashhad metropolitan area is determined and in the second stage, the categories affecting the integrated management of Mashhad metropolitan area are prioritized. In the first stage, a qualitative method based on grounded theory is used. A systematic method that has three main stages: open encryption, axial encryption, and selective encryption. To collect qualitative information, semi-structured interviews with experts and specialists in the field of urban and regional management in Mashhad have been used. In the second step, the SWARA method is used to prioritize the categories. SWARA is one of the structural equation modeling methods. For this purpose, a questionnaire was prepared for city managers. The sample size was 60 people. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed based on the views and opinions of experts. Reliability was also assessed as good with Cronbach's alpha confirmation. Finally, the components were prioritized by calculating the final normal weight. Discussion and Results To formulate the model in the first stage after the open encryption operation, in the second stage of encryption, common and similar concepts were semantically classified into 12 major categories. In the second stage, according to the identified categories, the central categories including "political integration", "organizational institutional integration", "governmental political integration" and "integration of interests and groups" were identified. And in the third stage, which was selective coding, the final model was obtained. Based on this model, the phenomenon of "managerial integrity in the mother city" was identified as the center phenomenon. The two categories of "coordinating organization" and "adaptation of the territory of urban management to political divisions" are causal conditions. The five categories of "rules and regulations", "amendment of laws", "plan", "contracts and agreements of municipalities" and "participation through elections" were considered strategies. "Decentralization" and "rules and regulations" are considered intervening conditions. "Participation of public, public and private sector groups" and "interaction of stakeholder groups" are the underlying factors within the field. "Organizational institutional integration", "Political integration", "Integration of interests and groups" and "Political-governmental integration" are the consequences. Conclusion In this research, an attempt has been made to provide comprehensive and complete indicators based on the opinion of local urban managers; The main difference between the indicators introduced in this study compared to other indicators in the literature of regional innovation is attention to all aspects of integration. According to the interviews in the first stage (open coding), several concepts were identified in the form of 12 components. These concepts include national and regional plans, laws and regulations, the dynamics of laws in line with existing issues, the participation of various civil and private sectors, public and public, the interaction of participatory groups, participation through elections, coordinated organization. Municipal contracts and agreements, non-overlap in the functions of organs, unity of command, adaptation of the territory of urban management to political divisions and decentralization. In the second stage, centralized coding was performed and the components obtained in a more general category of four components of "organizational institutional integration", "political integration", "integration of interests and groups" and "policy-government integration" They were grouped. In the third stage, the central phenomenon which is the "managerial integration in the field of mother city"; And the pivotal and primary components in the model were placed around the main phenomenon. After prioritizing the categories, it was determined that the components of national and regional plans, with a weight of 0.378, ranked first, rules and regulations, with a final weight of 0.215, ranked second, the dynamics of rules According to the existing issues, with a weight of 0.139, the third rank and the participation of various civil and private, public and public sectors, with a weight of 0.093 are in the fourth rank. Finally, it is proposed to develop an integrated management model in the metropolitan area of Mashhad in order to implement indicators and criteria. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Grounded Theory, Integrated Management, Managerial Differentiation, Metropolitan Area, SWARA | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akbari, N., Toghyani, Sh., Andalib, R., Mohammadi, M. (2020). Assessing the priority of resilience dimensions in the laws of regeneration of worn tissues (Case study: Sirus neighborhood, Tehran). Environmental Science. 18 (2): 130-111. (in Persian). Etghaei, H., and Pilevar,A. (2016). Developing a model for achieving integrated management of metropolitan (case study of Mashhad). Utopia, 9 (17). 301-285. (in Persian). Barakpour, N., and Asadi, I. (2016). Urban management and governance. (Third Edition), Tehran: University of Arts. (in Persian). Biswas, A. (2020). Establishing metropolitan governance and local governance simultaneously: Lesson from India's 74th Constitutional amendment act. Urban Management. 9(3), 316-330. Brenner, N., (2002). Decoding the newest metropolitan regionalism in the USA: critical overview. Cities,19 (1), 3-21. Faraji Rad, K,. (2018). Reviewing the proposed institutional-organizational models for managing the country's urban complexes and explaining the reasons for their non-realization. Sustainable City, 1 (2): 64-47. (in Persian). Farnhad Consulting Engineers. (2005). Development plan of Mashhad region. Volume eight. Determining the boundaries of Mashhad urban complex. Mashhad: Ministry of Roads and Urban Development of Khorasan Razavi. (in Persian). Ghasemi, V., (2011). Estimation of optimal sample size in structural equation models and evaluation of its adequacy for social researchers. Sociology of Iran. 12 (4): 138-161. (in Persian). Lalehpour, M., (2016). Recognition of management structure and spatial planning in Tehran metropolitan area. Urban Management, 5(1), 3-15. MacLeod, G.& Goodwin, M., (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance, Progress in Human Geography. 23 (4), 503-527 Mattiuzzi, E., & Chapple, K. (2020). Epistemic Communities in Unlikely Regions: The Role of Multi-level Governance in Fostering Regionalism. Planning Education and Research. Dol:0739456X20937287. McGill, R.,(1998). Urban Management in Developing Countries. Cities,15(6),463-471. Pirlone, F & et al., )2017(. Methods, tools and best practices to increase the capacity of urban systems to adapt to natural and man-made changes. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment,.10(2),215-228. Rahmani, M. (2013). City with development concepts. (First Edition), Tehran: The Hope of the Revolution. (in Persian). Rahmani, Mohammad. (2012). Metropolis, features and concepts. (First Edition), Tehran: The Hope of the Revolution. (in Persian). Sarrafi, M., and Nejati, N. (2017). Multilevel governance of metropolitan area in line with the neo-regionalism approach (Case study: Mashhad metropolitan area). City identity. 31:42-31. (in Persian). Sharifzadegan, Sh., and Koushki, H. (2014), Strategic Spatial Planning for Integrated Regional Governance in Tehran Metropolitan Area. Urban and rural management. 13 (34): 296-273. (in Persian). Spicer, Z.,(2015). Regionalism Municipal Organization and Interlocal Cooperation in Canada Canadian Public Policy .Analyse de Politique, 41(2),137-150. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (2011). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods, translated by Buick Mohammadi, (third edition). Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian). Tehran City Studies and Planning Center. (2014). Articles on urban management and good urban governance. (First Edition). Tehran: Tehran City Studies and Planning Center. . (in Persian). Wang, Y., (2015). The development of Chinese metropolitian planning management systems:with particular focus upon governance. University of South Wales. Retrieved 8012, June. 12, from https://www.proquest.com. Ye, L., (2014). State-led metropolita n governance in China: Making integrated city regions. Cities,.41,200-208. Ziari, K., and Mohammadi, A. (2016). Regional Development Management with Emphasis on Iran. (First Edition), Tehran: University of Tehran. (in Persian).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 807 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 560 |
||