عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر آینده بازآفرینی پایدار شهری (مورد پژوهی: بافت ناکارآمد منطقه 14 شهر اصفهان) | ||
| کاوش های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 8، شماره 2، اسفند 1399، صفحه 187-216 اصل مقاله (1.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| الهام ایزدفر1؛ فرزانه ساسانپور* 2؛ سیمین تولائی3؛ محمد سلیمانی4 | ||
| 1مدرس جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام نور، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار جغرافیا وبرنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بافتهای ناکارآمد بخشی از فضای شهری است که موجب بیسازمانی، عدمتعادل، عدمتناسب، بیقوارگی و افول حیات شهری میگردد. این بافتها، به عنوان کوچکترین سلول و مهمترین عامل در تداوم حیات شهری نقش مهمی را در آینده شهری دارند. بنابراین، لزوم توجه به چشمانداز آینده و برنامهریزی برای این بافتها، سبب پایداری محلات و کل شهر میشود. در سالهای اخیر، برنامهریزان و مدیران شهری برای مقابله با مشکلات پیشروی بافتهای ناکارآمد، توجه خود را به برنامهریزی پایدار با استفاده از بازآفرینی معطوف نمودهاند. بازآفرینی پایدار، رویکردی جامع و یکپارچه برای حل مسائل شهری است که به بهبود دائمی شرایط پایدار در محیط کالبدی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیستمحیطی میشود. پژوهش حاضر به دنبال آن است تا عوامل کلیدی مؤثر در بازآفرینی پایدار بافت ناکارآمد منطقه 14 شهر اصفهان در افق 1421 را مورد بررسی قرار دهد. این پژوهش، به لحاظ هدف کاربردی، از نظر ماهیت آینده پژوهی با رویکرد اکتشافی و روش تحقیق، توصیفی- تحلیلی است. اطلاعات مورد نیاز پژوهش از طریق مطالعات میدانی و اسنادی گردآوری شد. برای تحلیل دادهها از روش تحلیل اثرات متقابل و نرمافزار میکمک استفاده شد. یافتهها نشان داد عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر آینده بازآفرینی پایدار منطقه 14 شامل: تحریمهای بینالمللی، بحران مالی، سرمایهگذاری و امنیت، گسترش محدوده قانونی بافت منطقه 14، مهاجرتهای اتباع خارجی، مشارکت ذینفعان در تصمیمات شهری، شیوه مدیریت برنامهریزی، زیرساختهای گردشگری، پایداری زیستمحیطی میباشد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| عوامل کلیدی؛ بازآفرینی پایدار شهری؛ آیندهپژوهی؛ بافت ناکارآمد منطقه 14 شهر اصفهان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying the key factors in the future of sustainable urban regeneration: A case study of the inefficient urban tissues of District 14 in the city of Isfahan | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Elham Izadfar1؛ Farzaneh Sasanpour2؛ Simin Tolaei3؛ Mohammad Soleimani4 | ||
| 1Lecturer in Geography and Urban Planning, Payame Noor University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Inefficient structures are part of the urban space that cause disorganization, imbalance, inequality, inefficiency and declining urban life. As the smallest cell and the most important factor in the sustainability of urban life, these structures play an important role in the urban future. Therefore, paying attention to the future perspective and planning for these places can lead to the stability of neighborhoods and the whole city. In recent years, urban planners and managers have turned their attention to sustainable planning through regeneration to address the problems faced by inefficient structures. Sustainable regeneration is a comprehensive and integrated approach to solving urban problems, leading to the continuous improvement of sustainable conditions in the physical, social, economic and environmental domains. The present study seeks to investigate the key factors affecting the sustainable regeneration of the dysfunctional texture in District 14 of Isfahan City. Methodology: The present research is applied in terms of purpose, descriptive-analytical in terms of research method, and, in terms of nature, based on new futuristic, analytical and exploratory methods. Data collection was done through a documentary-survey technique. To determine the variables, the Delphi method was used along with the opinions of experts. By snowball sampling method, 15 experts consisting of those in urban planning who were familiar with the study area were selected to respond. In this connection, the variables extracted from the documents and the variables obtained from the interview with experts were combined, and a set of variables was formed, which affected the future of sustainable reconstruction of dysfunctional tissue in District 14 including physical, social, economic, environmental and institutional dimensions. The variables were included in a questionnaire in the form of a 35 x 35 matrix to identify the interactions among them. Finally, matrix analysis was performed using the Mick Mac software. Results and Discussion: The results of the study were based on a cross-impact matrix questionnaire that consisted of 1190 questions for 35 variables. Some variables were removed because they had no systematic and comprehensive effects. Depending on which area of the matrix the sum of the values of the matrix was located; five categories of variables could be identified. The method of distribution and the dispersion of variables in the scatter plot showed the degree of the system instability. According to the results obtained, out of 35 factors studied in this study, 16 factors were identified as key factors influencing the future of regenerating the dysfunctional texture in District 14. Out of those 16 factors, two were related to Zone 4 (independent variable). Due to the fact that the variables in this zone had a low impact, they were ignored according to the logic of the Mick Mac model and in order to simplify the planning process and focus on key variables. As a result, the 16 key factors found were provided to the group of experts in the form of a panel for screening. After re-screening, they were reduced to nine propulsive forces and considered as the final key factors. Conclusion: Generally, nine key drivers were extracted as the main factors affecting the sustainable recreation of the study area. They included the immigration of foreign nationals, sanctions, inflation, financial crisis, attraction of domestic and foreign investments, expansion of the legal confines of District 14, stakeholder participation in urban decisions, planning the polar management style, tourist infrastructures and environmental sustainability. The results of this study showed that the variables defined in the economic domain have the greatest impact on the situation of he dysfunctional textures. Therefore, these variables have a significant advantage in terms of influencing other variables, and they can be introduced as key factors affecting the future of the sustainable regeneration of the dysfunctional texture in District 14. The recognition of the key factors makes it possible to deal with the problem of structural dysfunctionality. The findings of this study and what has been obtained from the existing theories about sustainable urban regeneration call for attention to inefficient urban structures with new approaches to sustainable urban regeneration. This can not only stabilize and improve the economic, social, physical and environmental conditions of those structures but also increase sustainability in metropolises. At present, most reconstructions ignore the social, economic and environmental dimensions and pay attention to the physical dimension. In this research, the perspective of regeneration is stable. In other words, if the four dimensions of sustainable regeneration are considered together in metropolises, it can lead the whole city toward sustainability. Otherwise, without considering these four dimensions together, we will see the continuation of the current unstable situation, which has a beautiful shape but is worn-out and inefficient inside. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Keyfactors, Sustainable urban regeneration, Future studies, Inefficient texture of District 14 | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Andalib, A. (2010). Principles of Urban Renovation: A New Approach to Inefficient Tissues. Tehran: Azarakhsh Publications, (in Farsi).
Ayini, M., Ardestani, Z. (2009). Pyramid of Reconstruction and Public Participation Criteria for evaluating endogenous urban development programs (Case study: Law approach to organizing and supporting the production and supply of housing to improve and renovate worn-out urban structures). City identity, 3 (5), 47-58, (in Farsi).
Berry, J. N., et al. (2013). Urban regeneration: property investment and development. London: Taylor & Francis.
Cheuk Man HO, E., (2012). Renewing the urban regeneration approach in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Colantonio, A., Dixon, T. (2011). Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities, 18-36.
Divdid, A. (2018). Future Study of worn urban texture with a Scenario writing approach (Case study: District 14 of Tehran metropolis). Master Thesis, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University of Tehran, (in Farsi).
Ghanbari Mahalli, A. (2015). Analysis of the sustainable future of worn tissue (Case study: District 10 of Tehran metropolis). Master Thesis, Urban Planning Group, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University.
Godet, M. (2006). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. France: Economica publish.
Godet, M. (1991). From anticipation to action. Paris: UNESCO publishing,
Habibi, M., Maghsoudi, M. (2018). Urban Restoration: Definitions, Theories, Experiences, Universal Charters and Resolutions, Urban Methods and Measures. Tehran: University of Tehran, (in Farsi).
Hatami Nejad, H., Poorahmad, A., Nosrati Hashi, M. (2019). Future research in dilapidated urban context Case study: District 1, District 9 of Tehran. Sepehr Geographical Information, 28 (109), 37-55, (in Farsi).
Izadi, P., Hadiani, Z., Hajinejad, A., Ghaderi, J. (2017). Explaining and presenting the model of culture-based urban regeneration with emphasis on institutional approach. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 9(2), 163-187, (in Farsi).
Jeffrey, P., Pounder, J. (2000). Physical and Environmental Aspects. in Robers, P., and Sykes, H., eds., Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, London: SAGE, 86-108.
Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place branding, 1(1), 58–73.
Lali, M. (2017). Statistical Yearbook of Isfahan Province 2016. Isfahan: Management and Planning Organization of Isfahan Province.
Merrie, A., P. Keys, M. Metian, and H. sterblom. (2017). Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures. 22-32.
Miles, S., Paddison, R. (2007). Introduction: the rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban studies, vol. 42, no. 6, 833-839.
Nabati Nejad, M., Sadeghian, A., Mehrshad, A., Qasemzadeh, A. (2015). Social and cultural identity card of Isfahan neighborhoods. Isfahan: Isfahan Municipality Cultural and Recreational Organization, (in Farsi).
Mahin Naderifar, M, Goli, H, Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research, Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 171-179, (in Farsi).
Ng, M.K. (2005). Quality of Life Perceptions and Directions for Urban Regeneration in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 71, 441–465.
Pedram, A., Azgoli, M. (2009). Future Study of Methods, Concepts. Tehran: Defense Science and Technology Future Research Center - Defense Industries Educational and Research Institute, (in Farsi).
Poorahmad, A., Habibi, K., Keshavarz, M. (2010). The evolution of the concept of urban regeneration as a new approach in worn-out urban contexts. Iranian Islamic city studies, 1(1), 73-92, (in Farsi).
Pourjafar, M., Khodaei, Z., Pourkhairi, A. (2011). Analytical approach in recognizing the components, indicators and features of sustainable urban development. Iranian social development studies, 3(3), 25-36, (in Farsi).
Roberts, P., sykes, H. (2014). Urban Regeneration: a Handbook. Translated by Mohammad Saeed Izadi and Pirooz Hanachi, Tehran: University of Tehran, (in Farsi).
Sasanpour, F., Tolaei, S., Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2015).Study of Urban Livability in Twenty-two Districts of Tehran Metropolitan. Regional Planning, 5 (18), 27-42, (in Farsi).
Shabani, A., Izadi, M. (2017). Localization of integrated urban regeneration of historical textures of Islamic city. Iran University of Science & Technology, 5 (2), 1-19, (in Farsi).
Slaughter, R. (2007). New thinking for a new millennium, concepts, methods and ideas for future study. Translated by Aqil Malekifar and et al. Tehran: Defense Industries Educational and Research Institute Publications, Future Study Center, (in Farsi).
Stryjakiewicz, T., Kudłak, R., Ciesiółka, P., Kołsut, B., & Motek, P. (2018). Urban regeneration in Poland’s non-core regions. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 316-341.
Tallon, A. (2013). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.
Taherkhani, A. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Catalyst Projects in Regeneration of the Urban Decay Areas: Case Study: Sadal-Saltaneh Qazvin Province. Master Thesis, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts. Tarbiat Modares University, (in Farsi).
Vanolo, A. (2005). The imagin of the creative city: Some reflections on urban branding in Turin. Cities, 25 (6), 370-382.
Wigginton, N.S., Fahrenkamp-Uppenbrink, J., Wible, B. and Malakoff, D. (2016). Introduction to special issue: cities are the Future, Science, 35 (62), 904-905.
Zali, N., Ashrafi, S. (2013). Investigating the effect of globalization on urban development. Strategic studies of public policy, 4 (11), 1-16, (in Farsi).
Zali, N., Poursohrab, A. (2017). Regional Development Foresight with Emphasis on Combined Scenario Making and SWOT Analytical Model Approach. Spatial Planning, 21(3), 189-220, (in Farsi). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,132 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 948 |
||