ارزیابی زیست پذیری شهرهای کوچک از دیدگاه شهروندان مطالعه موردی شهر کاشمر | ||
| کاوش های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 8، شماره 1، شهریور 1399، صفحه 243-267 اصل مقاله (671.78 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیدامیرمحمد علوی زاده* 1؛ سمانه کیومرث2؛ الهام ابراهیمی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد رشته جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با وقوع رشد سریع شهرنشینی و افزایش مشکلات ناشی از آن، ضرورت تلاشی همه‌جانبه برای نجات شهر و سالم‌سازی آن بیش‌ازپیش احساس می‌شود. در پاسخ به بحران‌های موجود در شهرها، نظریه‌ها و رویکردهای مختلفی برای خروج از این مشکلات مطرح‌شده که یکی از این نظریه‌ها رویکرد شهر زیست پذیر است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی و ارزیابی زیست پذیری شهر کاشمر از دیدگاه شهروندان است. روش تحقیق، توصیفی- تحلیلی و شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها، کتابخانه‌ای و پیمایشی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق را شهروندان شهر کاشمر تشکیل می‌دهند و بر مبنای روش کوکران، 384 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب‌شده‌اند. روایی پرسشنامه تحقیق، بر مبنای نظر اساتید و کارشناسان حوزه مدیریت شهری بررسی و پایایی آن با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ در حد مطلوب (831/0) تشخیص داده شد. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که رابطه معناداری بین ویژگی‌های فردی (سن و جنس) و شاخص‌های زیست پذیری در این شهر وجود ندارد ولی ارتباط بین شاخص‌های زیست پذیری با سه متغیر دیگر (تحصیلات، شغل و وضعیت سکونت) در حد معنی‌دار است. مقایسه میانگین رتبه‌ها با استفاده از آزمون فریدمن نشان می‌دهد که بالاترین میانگین رتبه، به بعد اقتصادی اختصاص دارد و بدین معناست که شهر کاشمر در بعد اقتصادی از زیست پذیری بالاتری نسبت به سایر ابعاد اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی برخوردار است. جهت رتبه‌بندی متغیرها در هریک از ابعاد، متغیر فرصتهای شغلی موجود در بعد اقتصادی، متغیرهای حس هویت و تعلق مکانی در بعد اجتماعی و متغیر رضایتمندی از فضاهای عمومی در بعد زیست‌محیطی، بالاترین میانگین رتبه را به خود اختصاص داده‌اند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زیست پذیری؛ جامعه شهری؛ شهر زیست پذیر؛ کاشمر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis and Evaluation of the Livability of Towns from the Citizens’ Viewpoint: A Case study of Kashmar | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sayyed Amir Mohamad Alavizadeh1؛ Samaneh kumars2؛ Elham Ebrahimi2 | ||
| 1Associate Prof.inGeography, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2MSc. in Geography& Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| With the ongoing rapid growth of urbanization and its adverse effects on housing, employment and income, public health, physical and mental health, environment, resources and social norms in cities, it is necessary to adopt certain strategies for revitalization of cities, although a number of theories and approaches, including livable city approach, have already been proposed. This study aims to analyze and evaluate the urban livability of Kashmar from the citizens’ viewpoint. The research method is descriptive-analytic, and the data were collected using documents and surveys. The statistical population consisted of the citizens of the city of Kashmar, of whom 384 were selected as the sample through the Cochran's formula. The validity of the questionnaire was measured based on the comments of university professors and urban management experts, and its reliability was found high (0.831) using Cronbach's alpha. The results showed no significant relationship between the individual characteristics (age and sex) and the livability indicators. However, there was a significant relationship between the livability indicators and three other variables including education, occupation and residence status. The results of Friedman test for the ranking of various dimensions of urban livability and the comparison of the mean ranks revealed that economic dimension with the mean rank of 2.64 had the highest livability rate among the other dimensions. In terms of the social dimension, the sense of identity and place attachment had the highest rank (4.67). In terms of the environmental dimension, the public space had the highest mean rank (2.26), indicating the higher satisfaction of respondents with the public space indicator compared to the other environmental indicators. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Livability, City, Livable city, Kashmar | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedini, A., Karimi. R. (2016). Measuring liveability in cities based on FANP method (Case Study: Fifteen Areas of Urmia). Environmental Studies, 42 (4), 735-752, (in Farsi).
Badland, Hannah M., Carolyn, W., Lain. B. (2014). Urban Liveability: Emerging Lesson from Australian for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science and Medicine, 111, 64-73, (in Farsi).
Bazvandi, F., Shahbazi, M. (2014). The effect of vitality on creating citizen's mental image and ratio of utilization of urban spaces (case study: sidewalk of Sepahsalar st. in Tehran). Journal of Urban Landscape Research, First Year, 1, 33- 43, (in Farsi).
Barati, N., Yazdanpanah, M. (2011). Conceptual Relationship between Social Capital and Quality of Life in Urban Environments (Case Study: Pardis New Town), Research and Cultural Society. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2 (1), 25 – 49, (in Farsi).
Bemanian, M., RezaeiRad, H., Mehrdadian, A. (2011). Measurement of the effects of migration as the most important factor in identifying urban poverty in informal settlements using GIS (Case study of Kashmar). Journal of Environmental Planning, 4 (15), 125-146, (in Farsi).
Bandarabad, A. (2011). The Livable City from Foundations to Meaning. Azarakhsh Publications, Tehran, first edition, (in Farsi).
Dunstan, K. (2007). Creating an Indicator of Liveability: The Neighbourhood Liveability Assessment Survey (NLAS). Paper prepared for European Urban Research Association (EURA) conference, 12-14 September, Glasgow, Scotland.
Hankins, K. (2009). The disappearance of the state from Livable" Urban Spaces. Antipode 41 (5), 845–866.
Hatami Nejad, H., Rezvani, M., Fariba, K. (2014). Assessing the livability of the two cities of Sanandaj. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazarts, 4, 23-37, (in Farsi).
Imani, B., Zarebnia, M., Kanooni, R. (2018). Evaluation and analysis of rate of Habitability in the central part of metropolitan areas (Case study: District 12 of Tehran). Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, Seventh Year, 26, 57-70, (in Farsi).
Jafari, A. (1995). Natural Geography of Iran. Publications of the Institute of Geography and Cartography of Geology, (in Farsi).
Khaki, G. (2000). Thesis-Writing-Based Research Method. Bazetab Publications, Tehran, (in Farsi).
Soleimani, M., Tavalai, S., Rafieian, M., Zangana, A. (2016). Urban Living: Concept, Principles, Dimensions and Indicators. Journal of Urban Planning Geography Research, 4 (1), 27-50, (in Farsi).
Larice, M. (2005). Great neighborhoods: the livability and morphology high density neighborhoods in urban North America”, PHD
Leby, J., Hashim, A. (2010). Liveability Dimensions and Attributes: Their Relative Importance in the Eyes of Neighborhood Residents. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 12 (1), 76–31
Malek Hosseini, A., Malekpour, M. (2016). Kermanshah livability assessment, Journal of Geography. Civil Engineering, Urban Planning, Architecture, Second Year, 20, 53-62, (in Farsi).
Management and Planning Organization, Khorasan Province Statistics. (2000). Program and Budget Organization, 34, 79-94, (in Farsi).
Mousavi Nouri, A., Varesi, H., Mohammadi, J. (2016). Evaluation and analysis of livability components of Tehran metropolis, Geography, International journal of the Iranian geographical association, 14 (51), 237- 58, (in Farsi).
National Research Council. (2002). Community and quality of life; data needs for informed decision making, National Academy Press, Washington.
Newton, P. (2012). Liveable and Sustainable? Socio-Tecchnical Challenges for Twenty-FirstCntury Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 19, 81-102.
Nour, W. (2015). Towards Sustainability in the Livable City, International Transaction Journal of Engineering. Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 6 (4), 145-155.
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeingda social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19-30.
Timmer, V., Nola, K. (2005). The World Urban Forum 2006 Vancouver, working group discussion paper internation center for sustainable cities.
Sasanpour, F., Tavalaei, S., Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2015). Measuring and assessing urban livability in twenty-two regions of Tehran metropolitan area. Journal of Regional Planning, Fifth Year, 18, 27-42, (in Farsi).
Sasanpour, F., Alizadeh, S. (2015). Livability assessment of Urmia Urban areas with Raslpi Model. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 18(84) (in Farsi).
Yogesh, K., Bharat, A. (2013). Understanding Qualitative Conceptions of Livability: Indian Perspective. International Jurnal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 374-379. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 586 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 526 |
||